Shadow enhancers are seemingly redundant transcriptional cis-regulatory elements that regulate the same gene and drive overlapping expression patterns. Recent studies have shown that shadow enhancers are remarkably abundant and control the majority of developmental gene expression in both invertebrates and vertebrates, including mammals. Shadow enhancers might provide an important mechanism for buffering against mutations in non-coding regulatory regions of genes implicated in human disease. Technological advances in genome editing and live imaging have shed light on how shadow enhancers establish precise gene expression patterns and confer phenotypic robustness. Shadow enhancers can interact in complex ways and may also help drive the formation of transcriptional hubs within the nucleus. Despite their apparent redundancy, the prevalence and evolutionary conservation of shadow enhancers underscore their key role in emerging metazoan gene regulatory networks.

Live tracking of transcription reveals competition between transgenic reporters Transgenic reporters can also depress the expression of a neighboring gene Expression inhibition is in part because of competition for transcription factors (TFs)Competition is predicted with a model that restricts TFs to sub-nuclear ''hubs''

Proper development depends on precise spatiotemporal gene expression patterns. Most developmental genes are regulated by multiple enhancers and often by multiple core promoters that generate similar transcripts. We hypothesize that multiple promoters may be required either because enhancers prefer a specific promoter or because multiple promoters serve as a redundancy mechanism. To test these hypotheses, we studied the expression of the knirps locus in the early Drosophila melanogaster embryo, which is mediated by multiple enhancers and core promoters. We found that one of these promoters resembles a typical “sharp” developmental promoter, while the other resembles a “broad” promoter usually associated with housekeeping genes. Using synthetic reporter constructs, we found that some, but not all, enhancers in the locus show a preference for one promoter, indicating that promoters provide both redundancy and specificity. By analyzing the reporter dynamics, we identified specific burst properties during the transcription process, namely burst size and frequency, that are most strongly tuned by the combination of promoter and enhancer. Using locus-sized reporters, we discovered that enhancers with no promoter preference in a synthetic setting have a preference in the locus context. Our results suggest that the presence of multiple promoters in a locus is due both to enhancer preference and a need for redundancy and that “broad” promoters with dispersed transcription start sites are common among developmental genes. They also imply that it can be difficult to extrapolate expression measurements from synthetic reporters to the locus context, where other variables shape a gene’s overall expression pattern.

Transgenic reporters allow the measurement of regulatory DNA activity in vivo and consequently have long been useful tools in the study of enhancers. Despite the utility of transgenic reporters, few studies have investigated the potential effects these reporters have on the expression of other transgenic reporters or endogenous genes. A full understanding of the impacts transgenic reporters have on expression is required for accurate interpretation of transgenic reporter data and characterization of gene regulatory mechanisms. Here, we investigate the impact transgenic reporters have on the expression of other transgenic reporters and endogenous genes. By measuring the expression of Kruppel (Kr) enhancer reporters in live Drosophila embryos that contain either one or two copies of identical reporters, we find reporters have an inhibitory effect on one another's expression. Further, expression of a nearby endogenous gene is decreased in the presence of a Kr enhancer reporter. Through the use of competitor binding site arrays, we present evidence that reporters, and potentially endogenous genes, are competing for transcription factors (TFs). Increasing the number of competitor Bcd binding sites decreases the peak levels and spatial extent of Bcd-regulated enhancer reporters' expression. To understand how small numbers of added TF binding sites could impact gene expression to the extent we observe, we develop a simple thermodynamic model of our system. Our model predicts competition of the measured magnitude specifically if TF binding is restricted to distinct nuclear subregions, underlining the importance of the non-homogenous nature of the nucleus in regulating gene expression.

Since the publication of this work, Mario Gad has changed their name from Mario G. Elabd. This has now been amended in the HTML and PDF versions of the article.