Longitudinal study. Quality of life and psychological well-being were measured before the dermatologic visit with a self-completed questionnaire. Telephone interviews were performed 3 days and 4 weeks after the visit to evaluate patient satisfaction and medication adherence, respectively. Setting: Outpatient clinics of a large dermatologic hospital in Rome, Italy. Patients: A total of 1389 outpatients were contacted and 722 (52%) agreed to participate. Among them, 424 responded to the inclusion criteria and were enrolled in the study. Of these, 396 (93%) completed the telephone interviews. Main Outcome Measure: Self-reported compliance with dermatologic treatment. Results: The dermatologists' prescriptions were not exactly followed by 44% of patients. In multiple logistic regression analysis, treatment adherence was strongly associated with complete satisfaction. Poor quality of life on the emotions scale (indicating mainly high levels of shame and embarrassment) was also associated with medication adherence. On the contrary, a strong negative association was observed between psychiatric morbidity and compliance. Conclusions: This is the first longitudinal study on dermatologic patients showing that dissatisfaction with care and psychiatric morbidity are significantly and independently associated with poor medication adherence. To improve medication adherence, particular attention should be dedicated to the physician's interpersonal skills, which emerged as a major component of patient satisfaction. Moreover, our results highlight the need for a timely identification and appropriate management of psychiatric disorders in everyday dermatologic practice.
Improving the physician's interpersonal skills can increase patient satisfaction, which is likely to have a positive effect on treatment adherence and health outcomes. Dermatologists succeeded better in establishing a good relationship with clinically more severely affected patients than with patients who were clinically mildly affected despite their quality of life being impaired. Thus, the inclusion of a patient-rated quality of life can be a useful measure in dermatology, as it enables clinicians to perceive the patients' perception of their health status.
This is the first prospective study showing that patient satisfaction and psychiatric disorders have a significant effect on quality of life improvement among dermatological patients, independently of patient characteristics. Particular attention should be devoted to improving physicians' interpersonal skills, the major component of patient satisfaction.
To identify factors that might be useful as prognostic indexes for the risk of hepatocellular carcinoma in Italian patients with genetic hemochromatosis, 152 homozygotes were studied prospectively for 1 to 229 mo. Factors that were considered in estimating the risk of developing hepatocellular carcinoma were age, sex, cirrhosis (Child class), HBsAg, antibodies to HBsAg, antibodies to HBcAg, hepatitis C antibodies, alcohol abuse and the amount of iron removed during therapeutic phlebotomy to produce iron depletion. At diagnosis, cirrhosis was present in 97 patients and absent in 55. During follow-up, hepatocellular carcinoma developed in 28 of the 97 patients with cirrhosis but in none of those without. Among patients with cirrhosis, the cumulative probability of being free of hepatocellular carcinoma at 10 yr was 70%. For patients with and without HBsAg the probabilities of being free of liver cancer at 10 yr were, respectively, 54% and 75%; for those with and without history of alcoholism, 58% and 78%; and for those younger and older than 55 yr, 90% and 54%. In patients with cirrhosis, multivariate analysis using proportional-hazards (Cox) regression found that the only factors contributing significantly to the estimation of a prognostic index were age, presence of HBsAg and alcohol abuse. Age over 55 yr increased the relative risk of hepatocellular carcinoma 13.3-fold (p < 0.001), the presence of HBsAg increased it 4.9-fold (p < 0.02) and alcohol abuse increased it 2.3-fold (p < 0.04).(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.