With the current shift from centralized to more decentralized power production, new opportunities arise for small-scale combined heat and power (CHP) production units like micro gas turbines (mGTs). However, to fully embrace these opportunities, the current mGT technology has to become more flexible in terms of operation—decoupling the heat and power production in CHP mode—and in terms of fuel utilization—showing flexibility in the operation with different lower heating value (LHV) fuels. Cycle humidification, e.g., by performing steam injection, is a possible route to handle these problems. Current simulation models are able to correctly assess the impact of humidification on the cycle performance, but they fail to provide detailed information on the combustion process. To fully quantify the potential of cycle humidification, more advanced numerical models—preferably validated—are necessary. These models are not only capable of correctly predicting the cycle performance, but they can also handle the complex chemical kinetics in the combustion chamber. In this paper, we compared and validated such a model with a typical steady-state model of the steam injected mGT cycle based on the Turbec T100. The advanced one is an in-house MATLAB model, based on the NIST database for the characterization of the properties of the gaseous compounds with the combustion mechanisms embedded according to the Gri-MEch 3.0 library. The validation one was constructed using commercial software (Aspen Plus), using the more advance Redlich-Kwong-Soave (RKS)- Boston-Mathias(BM) property method and assuming complete combustion by using a Gibbs reactor. Both models were compared considering steam injection in the compressor outlet or in the combustion chamber, focusing only on the global cycle performance. Simulation results of the steam injection cycle fueled with natural gas and syngas showed some differences between the two presented models (e.g., 5.9% on average for the efficiency increase over the simulated steam injection rates at nominal power output for injection in the compressor outlet); however, the general trends that could be observed are consistent. Additionally, the numerical results of the injection in the compressor outlet were also validated with steam-injection experiments in a Turbec T100, indicating that the advanced MATLAB model overestimates the efficiency improvement by 25–45%. The results show the potential of simulating the humidified cycle using more advanced models; however, in future work, special attention should be paid to the experimental tuning of the model parameters in general and the recuperator performance in particular to allow correct assessment of the cycle performance.
With the current shift from centralized to more decentralized power production, new opportunities arise for small-scale Combined Heat and Power (CHP) production units like micro Gas Turbines (mGTs). However, to fully embrace these opportunities, the current mGT technology has to become more flexible in terms of operation — decoupling the heat and power production in CHP mode — and in terms of fuel utilization — showing flexibility in the operation with different Lower Heating Value (LHV) fuels. Cycle humidification e.g. by performing steam injection, is a possible route to handle these problems. Current existing simulation models are able to correctly assess the impact of humidification on the cycle performance, but they fail to provide detailed information on the combustion process. To fully quantify the potential of cycle humidification, more advanced numerical models — preferably validated — are necessary. These models are not only capable of correctly predicting the cycle performance, but they can also handle the complex chemical kinetics in the combustion chamber. In this paper, we compared and validated such a model with a typical steady-state model of the steam injected mGT cycle based on the Turbec T100. The advanced one is an in-house MATLAB® model, based on the NIST database for the characterization of the properties of the gaseous compounds with the combustion mechanisms embedded according to the Gri-MEch 3.0 library. The validation one was constructed using commercial software (Aspen® Plus), using the more advance RKS-BM property method and assuming complete combustion by using a Gibbs reactor. Both models were compared considering steam injection in the compressor outlet or in the combustion chamber, focussing only on the global cycle performance. Simulation results of the steam injection cycle fuelled with natural gas and syngas showed some differences between the two presented models (e.g. 5.9% on average for the efficiency increase over the simulated steam injection rates at nominal power output for injection in the compressor outlet); however, the general trends that could be observed are consistent. Additionally, the numerical results of the injection in the compressor outlet were also validated with steam-injection experiments in a Turbec T100, indicating that the advanced MATLAB® model overestimates the efficiency improvement by 25 % to 45 %. The results show the potential of simulating the humidified cycle using more advanced models; however, in future work, special attention should be paid to the experimental tuning of the model parameters in general and the recuperator performance in particular to allow correct assessment of the cycle performance.
Cycle humidification applied to micro Gas Turbines (mGTs) offers a solution to overcome their limited operational flexibility in terms of variable electrical and thermal power production when used in a Combined Heat and Power (CHP) application. Although the positive impact of this cycle humidification on the performance has already been proven numerically and experimentally, very detailed modeling of the system performance remains challenging, especially the determination of the recuperator effectiveness, which has the highest impact on the final cycle performance. Indeed, the recuperator performance depends strongly on the mass flow rate of the air stream and its humidification level, two parameters that are difficult to measure accurately. Accurate modeling of the recuperator performance under both dry and humidified conditions is thus essential for correct assessment of the potential of humidified mGT cycles in Decentralized Energy Systems (DES). In this paper, we present a detailed analysis of the recuperator performance under humidified conditions using averaged experimental data, extended with the application of a Support Vector Regression (SVR) on a time series to improve noise-modeling of the output signal, and thus enhance the accuracy of the monitoring process. In a first step, the missing experimental parameters, air mass flow rate and humidity level, were obtained indirectly, using rotational speed, fuel flow rate, exhaust gas composition and pressure level measurements in combination with the compressor map. Despite the low accuracy, some general trends regarding the recuperator performance could be observed based on these experimental data, indicating that the recuperator, despite having an increased total exchanged heat flux, is actually too small to exploit the full potential of the humidification. In a second step, by means of the SVR model, a first attempt was made to improve the accuracy and reduce the scatter on the recuperator performance determination. The predicted results with the SVR indicated indeed a reduced scatter on the determinations of the air mass flow rate and the amount of introduced water, opening a pathway towards online recuperator performance prediction.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.
hi@scite.ai
10624 S. Eastern Ave., Ste. A-614
Henderson, NV 89052, USA
Copyright © 2024 scite LLC. All rights reserved.
Made with 💙 for researchers
Part of the Research Solutions Family.