The mechanism by which estradiol acts on cell multiplication is still unclear. Under conditions of estradiol‐dependent growth, estradiol treatment of human mammary cancer MCF‐7 cells triggers rapid and transient activation of the mitogen‐activated (MAP) kinases, erk‐1 and erk‐2, increases the active form of p21ras, tyrosine phosphorylation of Shc and p190 protein and induces association of p190 to p21ras‐GAP. Both Shc and p190 are substrates of activated src and once phosphorylated, they interact with other proteins and upregulate p21ras. Estradiol activates the tyrosine kinase/p21ras/MAP‐kinase pathway in MCF‐7 cells with kinetics which are similar to those of peptide mitogens. It is only after introduction of the human wild‐type 67 kDa estradiol receptor cDNA that Cos cells become estradiol‐responsive in terms of erk‐2 activity. This finding, together with the inhibition by the pure anti‐estrogen ICI 182 780 of the stimulatory effect of estradiol on each step of the pathway in MCF‐7 cells proves that the classic estradiol receptor is responsible for the transduction pathway activation. Transfection experiments of Cos cells with the estradiol receptor cDNA and in vitro experiments with c‐src show that the estradiol receptor activates c‐src and this activation requires occupancy of the receptor by hormone. Our experiments suggest that c‐src is an initial and integral part of the signaling events mediated by the estradiol receptor.

Treatment of human prostate carcinoma-derived LNCaP cells with androgen or oestradiol triggers simultaneous association of androgen receptor and oestradiol receptor b with Src, activates the Src/Raf-1/ Erk-2 pathway and stimulates cell proliferation. Surprisingly, either androgen or oestradiol action on each of these steps is inhibited by both anti-androgens and anti-oestrogens. Similar ®ndings for oestradiol receptor a were observed in MCF-7 or T47D cells stimulated by either oestradiol or androgens. Microinjection of LNCaP, MCF-7 and T47D cells with SrcK ± abolishes steroid-stimulated S-phase entry. Data from transfected Cos cells con®rm and extend the ®ndings from these cells. Hormone-stimulated Src interaction with the androgen receptor and oestradiol receptor a or b is detected using glutathione S-transferase fusion constructs. Src SH2 interacts with phosphotyrosine 537 of oestradiol receptor a and the Src SH3 domain with a proline-rich stretch of the androgen receptor. The role of this phosphotyrosine is stressed by its requirement for association of oestradiol receptor a with Src and consequent activation of Src in intact Cos cells.

Background: Oral pathogens may exert the ability to trigger differently the activation of local macrophage immune responses, for instance Porphyromonas gingivalis and Aggregatibacter actinomycetemcomitans induce predominantly pro-inflammatory (M1-like phenotypes) responses, while oral commensal microbiota primarily elicits macrophage functions consistent with the anti-inflammatory (M2-like phenotypes). Methods: In healthy individuals vs. periodontal disease patients’ blood samples, the differentiation process from monocyte to M1 and M2 was conducted using two typical growth factors, the granulocyte/macrophage colony stimulating factor (GM-CSF) and the macrophage colony stimulating factor (M-CSF). Results: In contrast with the current literature our outcomes showed a noticeable increase of macrophage polarization from healthy individuals vs. periodontal patients. The biological and clinical significance of these data was discussed. Conclusions: Our translational findings showed a significant variance between control versus periodontal disease groups in M1 and M2 marker expression within the second group significantly lower skews differentiation of M2-like macrophages towards an M1-like phenotype. Macrophage polarization in periodontal tissue may be responsible for the development and progression of inflammation-induced periodontal tissue damage, including alveolar bone loss, and modulating macrophage function may be a potential strategy for periodontal disease management.

Recent observations that steroids use pathways universally known to be regulated by growth factors and interleukins highlight the following points: (1) Steroid stimulation of the canonical pathway Src/Ras/Erk signaling from membrane to nuclei or its single members has been observed in different cell types including human cancer‐derived cells, neurons, osteoblasts, osteocytes, and endothelial cells. This stimulation has been reconstituted and analyzed in transiently transfected cells. (2) Cellular context and intracellular localization of receptors are crucial in determining the biological effects evoked by this hormonal stimulation: proliferation, protection from apoptosis, and vasorelaxation. (3) Classical steroid receptors localized in the extranuclear compartment directly and, in some cases, simultaneously interact with Src. They are capable of unexpected cross talks responsible for the observed effects. (4) Other signaling pathways including P13K/AKT are also stimulated by steroids. The aim of future work will be to arrive at an integrated general view of the different signaling pathways activated by steroids and to analyze the concert between these pathways and the hormonal transcriptional action. This general view should be simultaneously verified in different cell contexts, under different physiologic and pathologic conditions. We expect that the new technologies, above all gene and protein microarray, will make this goal feasible.

The human microbiota shows pivotal roles in urologic health and disease. Emerging studies indicate that gut and urinary microbiomes can impact several urological diseases, both benignant and malignant, acting particularly on prostate inflammation and prostate cancer. Indeed, the microbiota exerts its influence on prostate cancer initiation and/or progression mechanisms through the regulation of chronic inflammation, apoptotic processes, cytokines, and hormonal production in response to different pathogenic noxae. Additionally, therapies’ and drugs’ responses are influenced in their efficacy and tolerability by microbiota composition. Due to this complex potential interconnection between prostate cancer and microbiota, exploration and understanding of the involved relationships is pivotal to evaluate a potential therapeutic application in clinical practice. Several natural compounds, moreover, seem to have relevant effects, directly or mediated by microbiota, on urologic health, posing the human microbiota at the crossroad between prostatic inflammation and prostate cancer development. Here, we aim to analyze the most recent evidence regarding the possible crosstalk between prostate, microbiome, and inflammation.