BackgroundVariable clinical outcomes are reported with fungal sensitisation in COPD, and it remains unclear which fungi and what allergens associate with poorest outcomes. The use of recombinant as opposed to crude allergens for such assessment is unknown.MethodsA prospective multicenter assessment of stable COPD (n=614) was undertaken in five hospitals across three countries: Singapore, Malaysia, and Hong Kong. Clinical and serological assessment was performed against a panel of 35 fungal allergens including crude and recombinant Aspergillus and non-Aspergillus allergens. Unsupervised clustering and Topological Data Analysis (TDA) approaches were employed using the measured sensitisation responses to elucidate if sensitisation sub-groups exist and their related clinical outcomes.ResultsAspergillus fumigatus sensitisation associates with increased exacerbations in COPD. Unsupervised cluster analyses reveal two “fungal sensitisation” groups, one characterized by Aspergillus sensitisation and increased exacerbations, poorer lung function and worse prognosis. Polysensitisation in this group confers even poorer outcome. The second group, characterized by Cladosporium sensitisation is more symptomatic. Significant numbers of individuals demonstrate sensitisation responses to only recombinant (as opposed to crude) Aspergillus fumigatus allergens 1, 3, 5, and 6, and exhibit higher exacerbations, poorer lung function and an overall worse prognosis. TDA validated these findings and additionally identified a sub-group within “Aspergillus sensitised COPD” enriched for frequent exacerbators.ConclusionAspergillus sensitisation is a treatable trait in COPD. Measuring sensitisation responses to recombinant Aspergillus allergens identifies an important patient subgroup with poor COPD outcomes that remain overlooked by assessment of only crude Aspergillus allergens.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.
hi@scite.ai
10624 S. Eastern Ave., Ste. A-614
Henderson, NV 89052, USA
Copyright © 2024 scite LLC. All rights reserved.
Made with 💙 for researchers
Part of the Research Solutions Family.