Efforts to improve the quality of pain management must move beyond assessment and communication of pain to implementation and evaluation of improvements in pain treatment that are timely, safe, evidence based, and multimodal.

The 45-item FACT-Hep can be used independently as a brief measure of disease-related symptoms and functioning. Alone or paired with the FACT-G, the HS has promise for use in assessing the disease-specific HRQL of patients with hepatobiliary cancers.

No abstract

The purpose of this quasi-experimental (pre and posttest) study was to test a model pain management program (PMP) to implement the American Pain Society (APS) quality assurance standards for the management of acute and chronic cancer pain using a continuous quality improvement (CQI) approach to improve professionals' knowledge and skills, patient satisfaction, and to identify areas needing improvement. The sample consisted of 1210 nurse responses and 698 interviews of patients with pain during hospitalization at a major urban cancer center. The PMP provided a structure (standards), educational opportunities, and training in CQI methods. Outcome measures included a patient evaluation questionnaire and concerns checklist; nurse knowledge, attitude and barriers questionnaire; and focus groups to identify areas needing improvement. Significant improvements were found in patients' satisfaction, nurses' knowledge and attitude scores, and reductions in nurses' perceptions of barriers. Focus groups revealed the need for improved communication among disciplines about pain and better assessment of patients unable to self-report. The program met its goal of implementing the APS standards, educating nurses, and identifying "system" problems, and improving overall patient satisfaction.

Prior studies have revealed deficiencies in the care provided to patients dying from advanced medical illnesses in acute care hospitals. These deficiencies are best addressed through system change, which may include the development of clinical pathways and quality improvement models. The Palliative Care for Advanced Disease (PCAD) pathway was developed by an interdisciplinary team and includes a carepath, a daily flowsheet, and a physician order sheet with standard orders for symptom control. To evaluate the utility of PCAD, the clinical pathway was introduced on three hospital units (Oncology, Geriatrics, and an inpatient palliative care/hospice unit) as part of a quality improvement initiative and outcomes were compared to two general medical units receiving usual care. A chart audit tool (CAT) was used to review medical records of 101 patients who died on one of these five units during the year prior to implementation (baseline) and 156 who died during the nine months of the PCAD intervention. Four indices from CAT evaluated change over time: the mean number of 1) symptoms assessed, 2) problematic symptoms, 3) interventions consistent with PCAD, and 4) consultations requested. Nine of 27 (33%) patients on the Oncology/Geriatrics units and all 50 patients who died on the palliative care/hospice unit were placed on PCAD. During the PCAD intervention, dying patients who resided on Geriatrics, Oncology and palliative care/hospice units were more likely to have DNR orders than the comparison units, whereas the comparison units were more likely to use "morphine infusions" and cardiopulmonary resuscitation than the units that received the PCAD intervention. The mean number of symptoms assessed increased significantly in all units (P < 0.001 for all comparisons). The number of problematic symptoms identified (P=0.014) and the number of interventions consistent with PCAD increased only on the palliative care/hospice unit (P=0.021). The number of medical consultations declined on all units and reached significance on the Geriatrics and Oncology units (P=0.037). Although these results reflect less than one year of the PCAD intervention and must be considered preliminary, they suggest that 1) a clinical pathway such as PCAD can serve as a managerial and educational tool to improve the care of the imminently dying inpatient; 2) a PCAD clinical pathway can be implemented on hospital units as a quality improvement initiative--a "PCAD intervention;" 3) a PCAD intervention can change outcomes in a positive direction, as measured using a chart audit tool; 4) a PCAD intervention can promote aggressive symptom assessment and treatment when goals of care are aimed at comfort; and 5) changes may occur in units that do not directly receive the intervention, a phenomenon that suggests the possibility of diffusion. Further study of this systems-oriented approach to change is warranted and should include direct assessment of patient and family outcomes, as well as measures of process.

No abstract

The Edmonton Symptom Assessment Scale (ESAS) was administered daily by nursing staff in a long-term care facility (LTCF) to monitor symptoms. Scores greater than or equal to 5 on a 0-10 scale were considered moderate-to-severe and triggered prompt treatment. One hundred and eight patients with advanced illness and perceived prognosis of less than 6 months were identified for rapid symptom management over a 7-month period. Forty-six (43%) of these patients had at least one episode of moderate-to-severe symptoms during the follow-up period. Thirty-one of these patients (67%) had a primary diagnosis of advanced AIDS and 12 (26%) had advanced cancer. Pain was the most frequent of the 15 symptoms measured, occurring in 29 patients. In the case of pain (P = 0.001), tiredness (P = 0.004), and well-being (P = 0.003), rapid symptom management led to significantly improved distress scores within 48 hours. These data suggest that it is feasible for nurses in an LTCF to use the ESAS on a daily basis to assess patients and obtain prompt treatment for distressful symptoms. Rapid treatment of symptoms can be an important quality indicator in nursing home patients with advanced illness.

We report on the implementation of a previously developed clinical pathway for terminally ill patients, Palliative Care for Advanced Disease (PCAD), on a Veterans Administration (VA) acute care oncology unit, comparing processes of care and outcomes for patients on and off the pathway. The PCAD pathway is designed to identify imminently dying patients, review care goals, respect patients' wishes, assess and manage symptoms, address spirituality, and support family members. Retrospective chart reviews from 15 patients who died on PCAD, 14 patients who died on general wards during the same time, and 10 oncology unit patients who died prior to PCAD revealed that PCAD patients were more likely to have documentation of care goals and plans of comfort care (P=0.0001), fewer interventions, and more symptoms assessed (P=0.004), and more symptoms managed according to PCAD guidelines (P=0.02). Implementation of PCAD improved care of dying inpatients by increasing documentation of goals and plans of care, improving symptom assessment and management, and decreasing interventions at the end of life.