1986). The effects of fat thickness and sex on pig meat quality with special reference to the problems associated with overleanness 2. Laboratory and trained taste panel results. ABSTRACTEvaluations of meat quality were made of 300 carcasses, of average weight 58 kg, falling into three fatness groups, 8, 12 and 16 mm for P 2 fat thickness. There were equal numbers of entire males and gilts. An increase in fat thickness was associated with an increase in the firmness of loin and shoulder backfat, a reduced incidence of fat separation and changes in the composition of both muscle and backfat: the concentration of lipid increased and that of water decreased, more markedly in backfat. In addition, the concentration of collagen in backfat decreased. The loin joint was visually most attractive when P 2 was 11 mm, attractiveness decreasing below and particularly above this value. Eating quality of grilled chops was assessed in a representative subsample of 96 pigs falling into the 8-mm and 16-mm P 2 categories. The only statistically significant difference observed between these extremes of fat thickness was in juiciness which was lower in the leaner pigs; the correlation between juiciness score and m. longissimus lipid concentration ('marbling fat') was 0-31. Juiciness did not influence the assessment of overall eating quality which showed no association with fatness. Entire males of similar backfat thickness to gilts (12 mm P 2 ) had a higher concentration of water and lower concentration of lipid in backfat and slightly softer backfat. There were no differences in eating quality, or in the presence of abnormal odours or flavours, between entire males and gilts. These results confirm those obtained in butcher and consumer panel tests in the same carcasses.

i

Carcass composition and quality and eating quality of the m. longissimus dorsi (LD) were compared in 15 entire male (ram) and 15 female (ewe) pure bred Dorset Down lambs (carcass weight range 12 to 23 kg).Rams grew 28 g/day faster than ewes, taking on average 2 weeks less to achieve 35 kg live weight. At the mean carcass weight of 16-8 kg, ram carcasses contained more lean (42 g/kg carcass weight) and bone (19 g/kg) and less fat (subcutaneous, 33 g/kg; intermuscular, 28 g/kg; perirenal-retroperitoneal, 14 g/kg) than ewe carcasses.At the same level of fat cover in the commercially prepared side, ewe carcasses required more trimming of subcutaneous fat than rams. However, there was more intermuscular fat (which is not removed by conventional cutting) in the ewes; consequently their saleable meat contained 51 g/kg more fat and 37 g/kg less lean than that from rams.The roast LD was invariably tender and the eating quality of LD from rams was as desirable as that from ewes, while overall eating quality compared favourably with that of animals studied previously. There was no evidence of an undesirable sexual odour or flavour in ram meat.With early maturing breeds, which can be finished off grass, non-castration of entire males offers the opportunity of improving the efficiency of lean meat production whilst retaining good carcass and eating quality.

No abstract

A B S T R A C T