This retrospective cohort study suggests that a small proportion of elective surgical patients may present with a full stomach despite the recommended duration of fasting. Further research is needed to establish the clinical implications of these findings in the elective setting. At present, the clinical role of gastric ultrasound continues to be for the evaluation of gastric contents to guide management when the risk of aspiration is uncertain or unknown.

Background During the Coronavirus Disease 2019 (COVID-19) outbreak in the Netherlands, the demand for intensive care beds exceeded availability within days. Initially, patients were redistributed regionally by ground transport. When transport over longer distances became necessary, we initiated a new Helicopter Emergency Medical Service (HEMS) operation. We hypothesize that the transport of contagious COVID-19 patients is feasible and safe for patients and HEMS personnel. Methods In this retrospective, single-centre observational study, flight and monitor data were used to calculate the exposure time of the retrieval team to COVID-19 patients. All the crew members (n = 18) were instructed on the proper use of personal protective equipment (PPE), dressing and undressing routine using buddy check supervision and cleaning procedures. All the team members were monitored for possible COVID-19 symptoms, as advised by our National Institute for Health and Environment. One month after completing the aeromedical transport all crew members were asked to donate a blood sample which was examined for the presence of IgG antibodies to SARS-CoV-2. Results From March 24 to May 25, 2020 the HEMS team transported 67 ventilated critical care COVID-19 patients. The exposure time was 7451 min (124 h and 11 min). One HEMS member reported pneumonia 6 weeks before the start of the patient transport. He tested positive for IgG SARS-CoV-2 by serology testing. We speculate that he was infected before the start of the operation; irrefutable evidence is lacking to support this claim because we did not perform serology testing before this operation started. Conclusion Occupational COVID-19 exposure during helicopter transport of ventilated critical care COVID-19 patients can be performed safely when proper PPE is applied.

No abstract

Purpose Introducing advanced hemodynamic monitoring might be beneficial during Helicopter Emergency Medical Service (HEMS) care. However, it should not increase the on-scene-time, it should be easy to use and should be non-invasive. The goal of this study was to investigate the feasibility of non-invasive cardiac output measurements by electrical cardiometry (EC) and the quality of the EC signal during pre-hospital care provided by our HEMS. Methods A convenience sample of fifty patients who required HEMS assistance were included in this study. Problems with respect to connecting the patient, entering patient characteristics and measuring were inventoried. Quality of EC signal of the measurements was assessed during prehospital helicopter care. We recorded the number of measurements with a signal quality indicator (SQI) ≥ 80 and the number of patients having at least 1 measurement with a SQI ≥ 80. Furthermore, the SQI value distribution of the measurements within each patient was analysed. Results In the experience of the attending HEMS caregivers application of the device was easy and did not result in increased duration of on-scene time. Patch adhesion was reported as a concern due to clammy skin in 22% of all cases. 684 measurements were recorded during HEMS care. In 47 (94%) patients at least 1 measurement with an SQI ≥ 80 was registered. Of all recorded measurements 5.8% had an SQI < 40, 11.4% had an SQI 40–59, 14.9% had a SQI between 60 and 79 and 67.8% had SQI ≥ 80. Conclusion Cardiac output measurements are feasible during prehospital HEMS care with good quality of the EC signal. Monitoring was easy to use and quick to install. In our view it is an promising candidate for the prehospital setting. Further research is needed to determine its clinical value during clinical decision making.

BACKGROUND Enteral nutrition is essential in the treatment of critically ill patients. Current methods to monitor enteral nutrition such as aspiration of residual volume may be inaccurate. Gastric ultrasonography estimates total gastric fluid volume using the Perlas model, but this model is validated for clear fluids only, and its accuracy for measuring thick fluids is unknown. OBJECTIVES The primary aim of this study was to evaluate the Perlas model for gastric volume estimation of enteral nutrition, a thick fluid product. DESIGN A single-centre, single blinded, randomised controlled study. SETTING Single university hospital, from May to July 2019. PARTICIPANTS Seventy-two healthy fasted volunteers were randomly allocated to different fluid volume groups. INTERVENTION Participants randomly ingested predetermined volumes between 50 and 400 ml of a feeding-drink (Nutricia Nutridrink). Following a standardised gastric ultrasound scanning protocol, a blinded sonographer measured the antral cross-sectional area in the supine and right-lateral decubitus positions. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES Measurements were performed at baseline, 5 min postingestion and 20 min postingestion. Gastric volumes were predicted using the previously established Perlas model and compared with total gastric fluid volumes after ingestion of the study drink. RESULTS The Perlas model underestimated the volume of thick gastric fluid and yielded a suboptimal fit for our data. However, antral cross-sectional area and total gastric thick fluid volumes were significantly correlated (Pearson's correlation coefficient 0.73, P < 0.01). A new model was fitted to predict gastric volumes of thick fluids, using the antral cross-sectional area (cm2) in the right-lateral decubitus position: Volume (ml) = 79.38 + 13.32 x right-lateral cross-sectional area. CONCLUSION The Perlas model for clear gastric fluid volume estimation is suboptimal for thick fluid volume assessment and an alternative model is presented. CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION Netherlands Trial Register Trial NL7677, Registration date: 16 April 2019; https://www.trialregister.nl/trial/7677.