Background and objectives Older patients reaching ESRD have a higher risk of adverse health outcomes. We aimed to determine the association of functional and cognitive impairment and frailty with adverse health outcomes in patients reaching ESRD. Understanding these associations could ultimately lead to prediction models to guide tailored treatment decisions or preventive interventions.Design, setting, participants, & measurements We searched MEDLINE, Embase, Web of Science, CENTRAL, CINAHL, PsycINFO, and COCHRANE for original studies published until February 8, 2016 reporting on the association of functional or cognitive impairment or frailty with adverse health outcome after follow-up in patients reaching ESRD either with or without RRT.Results Of 7451 identified citations, we included 30 articles that reported on 35 associations. Mean age was .60 years old in 73% of the studies, and geriatric conditions were highly prevalent. Twenty-four studies (80%) reported on functional impairment, seven (23%) reported on cognitive impairment, and four (13%) reported on frailty. Mortality was the main outcome measure in 29 studies (97%), and one study assessed functional status trajectory. In 34 of 35 (97%) associations reported, functional or cognitive impairment or frailty was significantly and independently associated with adverse health outcomes. The majority of studies (83%) were conducted in selected patient populations, mainly patients on incident dialysis.Conclusions Functional and cognitive impairment and frailty in patients reaching ESRD are highly prevalent and strongly and independently associated with adverse health outcomes, and they may, therefore, be useful for risk stratification. More research into their prognostic value is needed.
Functional and cognitive impairment, depressive symptoms and social isolation are highly prevalent in head and neck cancer patients and associate with high risk of adverse health outcomes. In the future, these measurements may guide decision-making and customize treatments, but more research is needed to further improve and firmly establish clinical usability.
Background
The prevalence of end-stage renal disease (ESRD) is increasing worldwide, with the majority of new ESRD cases diagnosed in patients aged >60 years. These older patients are at increased risk for impaired cognitive functioning, potentially through cerebral small vessel disease (SVD). Novel markers of vascular integrity may be of clinical value for identifying patients at high risk for cognitive impairment.
Methods
We aimed to associate the levels of Angiopoietin-2 (Ang-2), asymmetric dimethylarginine (ADMA), and a selection of eight circulating angiogenic miRNAs with SVD and cognitive impairment in older patients reaching ESRD that did not initiate renal replacement therapy yet (n = 129; mean age 75.3 years; mean eGFR 16.4 mL/min). We assessed brain MRI changes of SVD (white matter hyperintensity volume, microbleeds and presence of lacunes) and measures of cognition in domains of memory, psychomotor speed and executive function, comprised in a neuropsychological test battery.
Results
Older patients reaching ESRD showed an unfavorable angiogenic profile, as indicated by aberrant levels of Ang-2 and five angiogenic miRNAs (miR-27a, miR-126, miR-132, miR-223, miR-326), compared to healthy persons and patients with diabetic nephropathy. Moreover, Ang-2 associated with SVD and with the domains of psychomotor speed and executive function, while miR-223 and miR-29a associated with memory function.
Conclusions
Taken together, these novel angiogenic markers might serve to identify older patients with ESRD at risk of cognitive decline, as well as give insight into the underlying (vascular) pathophysiology.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.