In this study, we examined the effects the prostacyclin receptor (IP) agonist cicaprost exhibited on U46619-mediated thromboxane A 2 receptor (TP) signaling in platelets and compared it to that which occurs in human embryonic kidney (
The phospholipids sphingosine 1-phosphate (S1P) and lysophosphatidic acid (LPA) act via transmembrane receptors S1P 1-5 and LPA 1-3, respectively. Both have been implicated in inflammatory responses. S1P and LPA receptor profiles on neutrophils of patients with pneumonia compared with healthy subjects were determined by PCR and Western blotting. Chemotaxis studies were performed to assess functional differences. S1P or LPA receptors were immunoprecipitated from neutrophils to assess receptor heterodimerization with CXCR1, an IL-8 receptor, by Western blotting. Receptors S1P 1, 4, and 5 and LPA 2 were expressed on neutrophils from both subject groups, but S1P 3 and LPA 1 receptor expression was mainly confined to neutrophils of patients with pneumonia. Chemotaxis of neutrophils from patients with pneumonia compared with control subjects was significantly increased in response to S1P and LPA. Pretreatment with S1P or LPA reduced IL-8-induced neutrophil chemotaxis and transcriptional expression of the CXCR1 receptor. Receptors S1P 3 and 4 and LPA 1 formed constitutive heterodimers with CXCR1. LPA treatment reduced the amount of LPA 1/CXCR1 heterodimer. Therefore, profiles of S1P and LPA receptors differ between neutrophils of patients with pneumonia and control subjects, with consequences for neutrophil function.
Eosinophils adhere to airway cholinergic nerves and influence nerve cell function by releasing granule proteins onto inhibitory neuronal M(2) muscarinic receptors. This study investigated the mechanism of eosinophil degranulation by cholinergic nerves. Eosinophils were cocultured with IMR32 cholinergic nerve cells, and eosinophil peroxidase (EPO) or leukotriene C(4) (LTC(4)) release was measured. Coculture of eosinophils with nerves significantly increased EPO and LTC(4) release compared with eosinophils alone. IMR32 cells, like parasympathetic nerves, express the adhesion molecules vascular cell adhesion molecule-1 and intercellular adhesion molecule-1 (ICAM-1). Inhibition of these adhesion molecules alone or in combination significantly inhibited eosinophil degranulation. IMR32 cells also significantly augmented the eosinophil degranulation produced by formyl-Met-Leu-Phe. Eosinophil adhesion to IMR32 cells resulted in an ICAM-1-mediated production of reactive oxygen species via a neuronal NADPH oxidase, inhibition of which significantly inhibited eosinophil degranulation. Additionally, eosinophil adhesion increased the release of ACh from IMR32 cells. These neuroinflammatory cell interactions may be relevant in a variety of inflammatory and neurological conditions.
Eosinophil localization to cholinergic nerves occurs in a variety of inflammatory conditions, including asthma. This localization is mediated by interactions between eosinophil integrins and neuronal vascular cell adhesion molecule-1 (VCAM-1) and intercellular adhesion molecule-1 (ICAM-1). Eosinophil-nerve cell interactions lead to generation of neuronal reactive oxygen species and release of eosinophil proteins. The effects of eosinophil adhesion on neuronal intracellular signaling pathways were investigated. Eosinophil adhesion to IMR32 cholinergic nerves led to a rapid and sustained activation of the nuclear transcription factors nuclear factor (NF)-kappaB and activator protein (AP)-1 in the nerve cells. Eosinophil binding to neuronal ICAM-1 led to a rapid activation of ERK1/2 in nerve cells. Inhibition of ERK1/2 prevented NF-kappaB activation. Eosinophil adhesion to VCAM-1 resulted in AP-1 activation, mediated partially by rapid activation of the p38 mitogen-activated protein kinase. These data show that adhesion of eosinophils induces mitogen-activated protein kinase-dependent activation of the transcription factors NF-kappaB and AP-1 in nerve cells, indicating that eosinophil adhesion may control nerve growth and phenotype.
We have investigated the functional coupling of alpha and beta isoforms of the human thromboxane A(2) receptor (TP) to Galpha(16) and Galpha(12) members of the G(q) and G(12) families of heterotrimeric G proteins in human embryonic kidney (HEK) 293 cell lines HEK.alpha10 or HEK.beta3, stably over-expressing TPalpha and TPbeta, respectively. Moreover, using HEK.TP(Delta328) cells which over-express a variant of TP truncated at the point of divergence of TPalpha and TPbeta, we investigated the requirement of the C-tail per se in mediating G protein coupling and effector activation. Both TPalpha and TPbeta couple similarly to Galpha(16) to affect increases in inositol 1,4,5-trisphosphate (IP(3)) and mobilisation of intracellular calcium ([Ca(2+)](i)) in response to the TP agonist U46619. Whilst both TP isoforms mediated [Ca(2+)](i) mobilisation in cells co-transfected with Galpha(12), neither receptor generated corresponding increases in IP(3), indicating that the Galpha(12)-mediated increases in [Ca(2+)](i) do not involve PLC activation. Verapamil, an inhibitor of voltage dependent Ca(2+) channels, reduced [Ca(2+)](i) mobilisation in TPalpha and TPbeta cells co-transfected with Galpha(12) to approximately 40% of that mobilised in its absence, whereas [8-(N,N-diethylamino)-octyl-3,4, 5-trimethoxybenzoate, hydrochloride] (TMB-8), an antagonist of intracellular Ca(2+) release, had no effect on [Ca(2+)](i) mobilisation by either receptor isoform co-transfected with Galpha(12). Despite the lack of differential coupling specificity by TPalpha and TPbeta, TP(Delta328) signalled more efficiently in the absence of a co-transfected G protein compared to the wild type receptors but, on the other hand, displayed an impaired ability to couple to co-transfected Galpha(11), Galpha(12) or Galpha(16) subunits. In studies investigating the role of the C-tail in influencing coupling to the effector adenylyl cyclase, similar to TPalpha but not TPbeta, TP(Delta328) coupled to Galpha(s), leading to increased adenosine 3',5'-cyclic monophosphate (cAMP), rather than to Galpha(i). Whereas TP(Delta328) signalled more efficiently in the absence of co-transfected G protein compared to the wild type TPalpha, co-transfection of Galpha(s) did not augment cAMP generation by TP(Delta328). Hence, from these studies involving the wild type TPalpha, TPbeta and TP(Delta328), we conclude that the C-tail sequences of TP are not a major determinant of G protein coupling specificity to Galpha(11) and Galpha(16) members of the G(q) family or to Galpha(12); it may play a role in determining G(s) versus G(i) coupling and may act as a determinant of coupling efficiency.
1 The intermolecular cross-regulation mediated by the prostanoid IP-receptor (IP)/EP 1 receptor (EP 1 ) agonists PGI 2 and 17 phenyl trinor PGE 2 on TP receptor (TP) signalling within platelets was compared to that which occurs to the individual TPa and TPb receptors over-expressed in human embryonic kidney (HEK) 293 cells. Ligand mediated TP receptor activation was monitored by analysing mobilization of intracellular calcium ([Ca 2+ ] i ) following stimulation with the selective thromboxane (TX) A 2 mimetic U46619. 2 Consistent with previous studies, in platelets, PGI 2 acting through endogenous IP receptors completely inhibited U46619-mediated TP receptor signalling in a protein kinase (PK) A-dependent, PKC-independent manner. 3 In HEK 293 cells, PGI 2 , acting through endogenous AH6809 sensitive EP 1 rather than IP receptors, and the selective EP 1 receptor agonist 17 phenyl trinor PGE 2 antagonized U46619-mediated signalling by both TPa and TPb receptors in a PKC-dependent, PKA-independent manner. 4 The maximum response induced by either ligand was signi®cantly (P50.005) greater for the TPa receptor than the TPb receptor, pointing to possible physiologic dierences between the TP isoforms, although the potency of each ligand was similar for both TP receptors. TP D328, a truncated variant of TP receptor lacking the C-tail sequences unique to TPa or TPb receptors, was not sensitive to EP 1 receptor-mediated regulation by PGI 2 or 17 phenyl trinor PGE 2 . 6 In conclusion, these data con®rm that TPa and TPb receptors are subject to cross regulation by EP 1 receptor signalling in HEK 293 cells mediated by PKC at sites unique to the individual TP receptors and that TPa receptor responses are signi®cantly more reduced by EP 1 receptor regulation than those of the TPb receptor.
The adhesion of eosinophils to nerve cells and the subsequent release of eosinophil products may contribute to the pathogenesis of conditions such as asthma and inflammatory bowel disease. In this study we have separately examined the consequences of eosinophil adhesion and degranulation for nerve cell morphology and development. Eosinophils induced neurite retraction of cultured guinea pig parasympathetic nerves and differentiated IMR32 cholinergic neuroblastoma cells. Inhibition of eosinophil adhesion to IMR32 cells attenuated this retraction. Eosinophil adhesion to IMR32 cells led to tyrosine phosphorylation of a number of nerve cell proteins, activation of p38 MAP kinase, and generation of neuronal reactive oxygen species (ROS). Inhibition of tyrosine kinases with genistein prevented both the generation of ROS in the nerve cells and neurite retraction. The p38 MAP kinase inhibitor SB-239063 prevented neurite retraction but had no effect on the induction of ROS. Thus eosinophils induced neurite retraction via two distinct pathways: by generation of tyrosine kinase-dependent ROS and by p38 MAP kinase. Eosinophils also prevented neurite outgrowth during differentiation of IMR32 cells. In contrast to their effect on neurite retraction, this effect was mimicked by medium containing products released from eosinophils and by eosinophil major basic protein. These results indicate that eosinophils modify the morphology of nerve cells by distinct mechanisms that involve adhesion and released proteins.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.
hi@scite.ai
10624 S. Eastern Ave., Ste. A-614
Henderson, NV 89052, USA
Copyright © 2024 scite LLC. All rights reserved.
Made with 💙 for researchers
Part of the Research Solutions Family.