Long distance sexual communication in moths has fascinated biologists because of the complex, precise female pheromone signals and the extreme sensitivity of males to specific pheromone molecules. Progress has been made in identifying some genes involved in female pheromone production and in male response. However, we have lacked information on the genetic changes involved in evolutionary diversification of these mate-finding mechanisms that is critical to understanding speciation in moths and other taxa. We used a combined quantitative trait locus (QTL) and candidate gene approach to determine the genetic architecture of sexual isolation in males of two congeneric moths, Heliothis subflexa and Heliothis virescens. We report behavioral and neurophysiological evidence that differential male responses to three female-produced chemicals (Z9-14:Ald, Z9-16:Ald, Z11-16:OAc) that maintain sexual isolation of these species are all controlled by a single QTL containing at least four odorant receptor genes. It is not surprising that pheromone receptor differences could control H. subflexa and H. virescens responses to Z9-16:Ald and Z9-14:Ald, respectively. However, central rather than peripheral level control over the positive and negative responses of H. subflexa and H. virescens to Z11-16:OAc had been expected. Tight linkage of these receptor genes indicates that mutations altering male response to complex blends could be maintained in linkage disequilibrium and could affect the speciation process.Other candidate genes such as those coding for pheromone binding proteins did not map to this QTL, but there was some genetic evidence of a QTL for response to Z11-16:OH associated with a sensory neuron membrane protein gene.mating | speciation | AFLP | odorant receptor | Heliothis E volutionary diversification of sexual communication traits remains paradoxical (1, 2) because signal production and signal reception are under independent genetic control, and a mutation causing an alteration in one component of the system is predicted to reduce efficiency of communication and to cause a loss of fitness. The resulting stabilizing selection is expected to promote evolutionary stasis, not diversification (3-5). Systems in which changes in signals and responses are governed by the same genetic alterations (i.e., pleiotropy) should be less evolutionarily constrained in many cases (6), and studies of mating communication have revealed a few systems that appear to have this property (7-9). However, no pleiotropy has been found between signal production and response in moths (e.g., 5, 10). Because female and male moths with divergent signals and responses appear to be selected against (11, 12), we have no simple explanation for the great diversity of moths (∼180,000 species) and moth pheromones (5,13,14).Beyond capturing the attention of evolutionary biologists, the diversity of long distance, pheromone-based sexual communication traits in moths has become a focus of some molecular biologists, biochemists, neurophysiologists, and communi...

No abstract