Flow cytometry crossmatching (FC-XM) is the most sensitive cell-based method for detecting donor-specific antibodies in clinical organ transplantation. Unfortunately, background FC-XM reactivity is elevated in assays with B lymphocytes-partly because of nonspecific immunoglobulin binding by Fc receptors and B-cell surface immunoglobulins. To reduce the background reactivity in a B-cell FC-XM assay, we treated lymphocytes with pronase (1 mg/mL for 30 minutes). This treatment drastically reduced the presence of kappa light chains and Fc receptors (CD32b), while the concomitant decrease in CD19, CD20 and major histocompatibility complex (MHC) I and II expression on B-cells was acceptable. Higher pronase concentrations (>2 mg/mL) started to significantly affect CD19, CD20, MHC-I and -II expression on B-cells. In subsequent prospective experiments (on 42 donor cells tested with 102 sera), we found that pronase treatment was associated with a relative increase of the sensitivity and specificity in our B-cell FC-XM assay.
Crossmatching is essential prior to kidney transplantation to confirm compatibility between the donor and the recipient, particularly to prevent acute antibody-mediated rejection. An unexpected positive crossmatch may be obtained in recipients with an autoimmune disease or preexisting antibodies not detected by single-antigen bead array due to complement interference or who have been previously treated by desensitization protocols such as rituximab, antithymocyte globulin, or intravenous immunoglobulins. We report donor and recipient investigations that revealed unexpected positive B-cells crossmatch, probably due to donor cells, as the donor had received rituximab therapy shortly before organ harvesting, in a context of severe idiopathic thrombocytopenic purpura. We consequently detected unexpected Class II IgG complement-dependent cytotoxicity for all sera tested. Other laboratory investigations failed to elucidate the reasons for this recipient-related positivity.
Preformed donor-specific antibodies against human leukocyte antigen can induce antibody-mediated rejection after organ transplant. Hence, future transplant recipients undergo pretransplant screening for preformed antibodies (ie, virtual crossmatch). Subsequently, prospective (analytic) crossmatching is performed using conventional, complementdependent cytotoxicity assays and/or flow cytometrybased methods. The present article reviews factors that must be considered when unexpected, positive, prospective crossmatches are observed. First, the prozone effect caused by the interference of complement or immunoglobulin M must be abrogated by treating the serum with moderate heat, dilution, hypotonic dialysis, EDTA, or dithiothreitol. Second, the physician must check for the presence of potentially interfering autoantibodies (in a context of autoimmune disease or human immunodeficiency virus infection) or therapeutic antibodies (such as rituximab and antithymocyte globulin). In conclusion, knowledge of each assay's technical characteristics will enable the physician to reliably interpret any discrepancies. The reasons for an unexpected, positive, prospective crossmatch must be elucidated before transplant to ensure efficient organ allocation and optimize patient outcomes.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.