Large cohort studies suggest that high convective volumes associated with online hemodiafiltration may reduce the risk of mortality/morbidity compared to optimal high-flux hemodialysis. By contrast, intradialytic tolerance is not well studied. The aim of the FRENCHIE (French Convective versus Hemodialysis in Elderly) study was to compare high-flux hemodialysis and online hemodiafiltration in terms of intradialytic tolerance. In this prospective, open-label randomized controlled trial, 381 elderly chronic hemodialysis patients (over age 65) were randomly assigned in a one-to-one ratio to either high-flux hemodialysis or online hemodiafiltration. The primary outcome was intradialytic tolerance (day 30-day 120). Secondary outcomes included health-related quality of life, cardiovascular risk biomarkers, morbidity, and mortality. During the observational period for intradialytic tolerance, 85% and 84% of patients in high-flux hemodialysis and online hemodiafiltration arms, respectively, experienced at least one adverse event without significant difference between groups. As exploratory analysis, intradialytic tolerance was also studied, considering the sessions as a statistical unit according to treatment actually received. Over a total of 11,981 sessions, 2,935 were complicated by the occurrence of at least one adverse event, with a significantly lower occurrence in online hemodiafiltration with fewer episodes of intradialytic symptomatic hypotension and muscle cramps. By contrast, health-related quality of life, morbidity, and mortality were not different in both groups. An improvement in the control of metabolic bone disease biomarkers and β2-microglobulin level without change in serum albumin concentration was observed with online hemodiafiltration. Thus, overall outcomes favor online hemodiafiltration over high-flux hemodialysis in the elderly.

No abstract

In this prospective randomized study including 28 patients, we show that, in cytomegalovirus (CMV)-seronegative renal transplant recipients (R-) receiving a CMV-seropositive graft (D+), high doses of acyclovir (ACV, i.e. 3,200 mg/day) during the first 3 months after transplantation were as efficient as hyperimmune CMV immunoglobulins (CMV Igs) plus high doses of ACV regarding the prophylaxis of CMV primoinfection. Fifty-four percent of the patients in the ACV arm and 50% in the other arm presented at least one episode of viremia (n.s.). The incidence of CMV disease was 31% in the ACV group and 20% in the ACV + CMV Ig group (n.s.). By comparison with historical controls (no prophylaxis), we found that ACV with or without CMV Ig significantly delayed and significantly decreased the rate of CMV disease, although the severity score was not statistically different. Moreover, high doses of ACV were far less expensive than their combination with hyperimmune CMV Igs. Thus, until oral ganciclovir is available for the prophylaxis of primary CMV infection in renal transplant patients, we recommend the use of high doses of ACV for the first 3 months after transplantation in high-risk renal transplant patients, i.e. D+/R-.

No abstract

We studied the prevalence of hepatitis C virus (HCV) infection in 350 renal transplant (RT) patients with a functioning graft. The determination of HCV infection was based upon second-generation ELISA tests (ELISA-2, Abbott) confirmed by second-generation RIBA tests (RIBA-2, Chiron), including the proteins C22-3, C100-3, C33-C and 5-11. Three hundred and sixteen of these RT patients were on ciclosporin A (CsA) therapy with or without steroids (CS) and azathioprine (AZA); 34 received conventional immunosuppression. Eighty-seven RT patients were found to be HCV-positive (2.5%) when assessed by ELISA-2 tests; RIBA-2 was positive in 61 cases and ‘indeterminate’ in 26. Most of the HCV-positive patients had antibodies against C22-3 (94%), whereas antibodies against nonstructural antigens (C100-3, C33-C) were observed in 18 and 70% of cases, respectively. More than 88% of the HCV-positive patients were already HCV-positive before renal transplantation. Risk factors of developing HCV infection included: (i) the time on dialysis; (ii) the number of blood transfusions before transplantation, and (iii) the number of previous graft(s). There were significantly more HCV-positive patients among those on conventional immunosuppressive therapy (16 of 39) than among those on CsA (71 of 311; p < 0.02). Of those who where HCV-positive before transplantation, and for whom liver enzyme (LE) results were available (n = 68), 40 had either a normal or a transient increase in alanine aminotransferase (ALT) levels at that time, whereas 28 had a chronic increase in serum ALT ± γ-glutamyltranspeptidase levels. After transplantation, there was biochemical evidence of chronic liver disease in 33 patients (48.5%). Interestingly, 41 and 64% of those with respectively normal and increased LEs before transplantation presented with a biochemical chronic liver disease after RT. Surprisingly, 36% of those with a pretransplantation increase in ALT had normalized aminotransferase after transplantation. The daily doses of AZA, CS (i.e. prednisolone) were not statistically different between HCV-positive RT patients on conventional therapy (group A) and those on CsA (group B). Moreover, within each group, the daily doses of AZA, CS or CsA were not statistically different between those with a chronic increase in LEs and those with normal LEs. The percentage of HCV-positive RT patients with chronic abnormal LEs was not different between groups A and B. Surprisingly, the patients who were treated at least once for acute rejection with methylprednisolone pulses had a significantly lower incidence of chronic increases in LEs. Nine patients seroconverted for HCV after transplantation: 6 experienced a chronic increase in LEs. Finally, 7 of 87 patients were coinfected by HBV, all of them had a chronic increase in LEs. These results emphasize the fact that ALT alone cannot be used as a surrogate marker for chronic HCV infection in transplantation patients, thus a liver biopsy is required before and a few years after RT to assess liver damage in this population.