Different sera and fecal BA profiles in IBS patients could be secondary to dysbiosis and further differences between IBS-C and IBS-D could explain stool patterns. This study opens new fields in IBS physiopathology and suggests that modification of BA profiles could have therapeutic potential.

Immune checkpoint inhibitors are monoclonal antibodies indicated for an increasing number of malignant diseases. These agents can cause specific side effects, which need to be anticipated while clear patterns of management need to be established. Immune checkpoint inhibitor-mediated gastrointestinal side effects, including diarrhea and colitis, occur in up to 30% of patients. Severe colitis can lead to severe dehydration or intestinal perforation. Endoscopic lesions and histopathological features of immune checkpoint inhibitor-induced colitis are similar to an inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) flare. Patients with immune checkpoint inhibitor-induced diarrhea and colitis are treated with corticosteroids. Infliximab can be used in cases of corticosteroid failure. Rectosigmoïdoscopy or colonoscopy should be performed when severe immune checkpoint inhibitor-induced colitis is suspected, but endoscopic investigations should not delay treatment. Specific patient education as well as co-operation between oncologists and gastroenterologists is essential.

Key Clinical MessageOlmesartan is an angiotensin II receptor antagonist which may cause severe sprue‐like enteropathy with duodenal villous atrophy. Skin lesions may be associated as reported for the first time in our case. Clinicians should be informed of this side effect and its reversibility after suspension of the drug.

No abstract

Background Laterally spreading tumours are separated in subclasses: granular, homogenous or nodular mixed; and non-granular, flat or pseudodepressed. For every subtype, a proper risk of submucosal invasive cancer has been described in Asian series. Objective The aim of the study was to determine the rate of cancer and submucosal invasive cancer in a Western series of endoscopic-resected laterally spreading tumours and their endoscopic predictive factors. Methods A total of 374 laterally spreading tumours ≥20 mm were resected by endoscopy in our single centre between 2012–2016. We analysed endoscopic and pathological data from our prospective database, determining the rates of cancer and submucosal invasive cancer according to the subtype of laterally spreading tumour. Results The rates of submucosal invasive cancer for granular homogenous, granular nodular mixed, non-granular flat, non-granular pseudodepressed laterally spreading tumours were 4.9%, 15.9%, 3.0% and 19.4%, respectively. Endoscopic mucosal resection was used in 58.0% and endoscopic submucosal dissection in 42.0%. Endoscopic submucosal dissection was associated with a higher rate of en-bloc resection (87.3% vs 26.3%; p < 0.0001), and a lower risk of recurrence (7.6% vs 15.2%; p = 0.026). Adverse event rates were not statistically different (9.5% vs 6.4%, p = 0.26). Predictive endoscopic factors of submucosal invasive cancer were: invasive pit pattern (hazard ratio = 33 (8.81–143.3)), non-granular pseudodepressed laterally spreading tumours (hazard ratio = 11.9 (0.89–146.2)), and granular nodular mixed laterally spreading tumours (hazard ratio = 3.42 (0.99–13.0)). Conclusions The risk of submucosal invasive cancer varies according to the laterally spreading tumour subtype. Three factors were associated with submucosal invasion and should justify an endoscopic submucosal dissection: non-granular pseudodepressed laterally spreading tumours, granular nodular mixed laterally spreading tumours subtypes and invasive pit pattern.

The low complication rate during the four periods allows us to consider ambulatory EMR for large colorectal lesions ≥20 mm in diameter as an option. One hemoclip per centimeter may help prevent delayed hemorrhage in patients without anticoagulation drugs.

Background The prognosis of patients with metastatic carcinoma of the biliary tract (mBTC) is poor and a systemic therapy with gemcitabine and platinum-based is the gold standard. The addition of bevacizumab to the chemotherapy might increase patients' survival. Our aim was to assess and compare the efficacy of GEMOX (gemcitabine and oxaliplatin regimen) plus bevacizumab to GEMOX alone in mBTC. Methods Patients with mBTC who received the GEMOX-bevacizumab (n = 32; Group A) or GEMOX (n = 25; Group B) regimen as first-line treatment were compared. Treatment was repeated every two weeks until disease progression or unacceptable adverse effects occurred. The primary evaluation criterion was the progression-free survival (PFS). Results A quarter of patients (8/32) from Group A and a fifth of patients (13/25) from Group B had an objective response. The median PFS was 6.48 months and 3.72 months in Group A and B, respectively (p = 0.049). The median OS was 11.31 months and 10.34 months in Group A and B, respectively. Grade 3/4 sepsis was identified in 9.4% and 12% in Group A and B, respectively, (p = 0.64). Conclusion In mBTC, the addition of bevacizumab to GEMOX increased the progression-free survival and was associated with manageable toxicity. These data pave the way for further evaluation of antiangiogenic agents in mBTC.

No abstract