Prokaryote-eukaryote interactions are primordial, but host selection of its bacterial community remains poorly understood. Because eukaryote evolution affects numerous traits shaping the ecology of their microbiome, we can expect that many evolutionary changes in the former will have the potential to impact on the composition of the latter. Consequently, the more phylogenetically distant the eukaryotic hosts, the more distinct their associated bacterial communities should be. We tested this with plants, by comparing the bacterial communities associated with maize genotypes or other Poaceae. 16S rRNA taxonomic microarray analysis showed that the genetic distance between rhizobacterial communities correlated significantly with the phylogenetic distance (derived from chloroplastic sequences) between Poaceae genotypes. This correlation was also significant when considering specific bacterial populations from all main bacterial divisions, instead of the whole rhizobacterial community. These results indicate that eukaryotic host's evolutionary history can be a significant factor shaping directly the assembly and composition of its associated bacterial compartment.

The phytostimulatory alphaproteobacterium Azospirillum lipoferum 4B exhibits the plant-beneficial gene acdS, which enables deamination of the ethylene precursor 1-aminocyclopropane-1-carboxylic acid (ACC). Here, we show that acdS is in the vicinity of acdR, a homolog to leucine-responsive regulator lrp, in A. lipoferum 4B and most other acdS+ Proteobacteria. Unlike in Beta- and Gammaproteobacteria, acdS (and acdR) is preferentially located on symbiotic islands and plasmids in Alphaproteobacteria. In A. lipoferum 4B, acdS was mapped on a 750-kb plasmid that is lost during phenotypic variation, whereas other phytobeneficial genes such as nifH (associative nitrogen fixation) are maintained. In Proteobacteria, the phylogenies of acdR and acdS were largely but not totally congruent, despite physical proximity of the genes, regardless of whether DNA or deduced protein sequences were used. Potential Lrp, cAMP receptor protein (CRP) and fumarate-nitrate reduction regulator (FNR) binding sites were evidenced in the acdS promoter regions of strain 4B and most of 46 other acdS+ Proteobacteria. Indeed, transcriptional and enzymatic analyses done in vitro pointed to the involvement of Lrp- and FNR-like transcriptional up-regulation of ACC deaminase activity in A. lipoferum 4B. This is the first synteny, phylogenetic, and functional analysis of factors modulating acdS expression in Azospirillum plant growth-promoting rhizobacterium.

Pseudomonads producing the antimicrobial metabolite 2,4-diacetylphloroglucinol (Phl) can control soil-borne phytopathogens, but their impact on other plant-beneficial bacteria remains poorly documented. Here, the effects of synthetic Phl and Phl+ Pseudomonas fluorescens F113 on Azospirillum brasilense phytostimulators were investigated. Most A. brasilense strains were moderately sensitive to Phl. In vitro, Phl induced accumulation of carotenoids and poly-β-hydroxybutyrate-like granules, cytoplasmic membrane damage and growth inhibition in A. brasilense Cd. Experiments with P. fluorescens F113 and a Phl− mutant indicated that Phl production ability contributed to in vitro growth inhibition of A. brasilense Cd and Sp245. Under gnotobiotic conditions, each of the three strains, P. fluorescens F113 and A. brasilense Cd and Sp245, stimulated wheat growth. Co-inoculation of A. brasilense Sp245 and Pseudomonas resulted in the same level of phytostimulation as in single inoculations, whereas it abolished phytostimulation when A. brasilense Cd was used. Pseudomonas Phl production ability resulted in lower Azospirillum cell numbers per root system (based on colony counts) and restricted microscale root colonization of neighbouring Azospirillum cells (based on confocal microscopy), regardless of the A. brasilense strain used. Therefore, this work establishes that Phl+ pseudomonads have the potential to interfere with A. brasilense phytostimulators on roots and with their plant growth promotion capacity.

Aims:  To assess the applicability of sequence characterized amplified region (SCAR) markers obtained from BOX, ERIC and RAPD fragments to design primers for real‐time PCR quantification of the phytostimulatory maize inoculants Azospirillum brasilense UAP‐154 and CFN‐535 in the rhizosphere. Methods and Results:  Primers were designed based on strain‐specific SCAR markers and were screened for successful amplification of target strain and absence of cross‐reaction with other Azospirillum strains. The specificity of primers thus selected was verified under real‐time PCR conditions using genomic DNA from strain collection and DNA from rhizosphere samples. The detection limit was 60 fg DNA with pure cultures and 4 × 103 (for UAP‐154) and 4 × 104 CFU g−1 (for CFN‐535) in the maize rhizosphere. Inoculant quantification was effective from 104 to 108 CFU g−1 soil. Conclusion:  BOX‐based SCAR markers were useful to find primers for strain‐specific real‐time PCR quantification of each A. brasilense inoculant in the maize rhizosphere. Significance and Impact of the Study:  Effective root colonization is a prerequisite for successful Azospirillum phytostimulation, but cultivation‐independent monitoring methods were lacking. The real‐time PCR methods developed here will help understand the effect of environmental conditions on root colonization and phytostimulation by A. brasilense UAP‐154 and CFN‐535.