The majority of bushcricket species (Insecta: Orthoptera: Tettigoniidae) use acoustic signals for mate attraction. Song production and the sound‐producing structures, therefore, can be argued to be under sexual selection. The sound‐producing structures might determine differences in the acoustic parameters of male songs, like the fundamental frequency. We investigated the morphology and scaling relationships of the sound production organs in males of the bushcricket Poecilimon ampliatus. Selection acting on morphological traits can be inferred from allometric relationships. Our results show that heavier and larger males have bigger sound‐producing organs: wing area scales positively with body mass as well as with body size. The length of the stridulatory file and the stridulatory teeth length both increase with wing area. In contrast, the number and density of teeth on the stridulatory file decrease in heavier males. As a result, males with larger wings and longer stridulatory files have a reduced teeth density. Positive isometric scaling was detected for the length of stridulatory teeth, as well as negative isometry for teeth number and teeth density. Wing area in turn seems to be under positive sexual selection, as the relationship of wing size on male body size show a steep positive slope (β = 2.4). The morphological results indicate positive selection on sound‐producing structures and are in line with the female preference for heavier males in mate choice experiments.
This review paper discusses rhythmic interactions and distinguishes them from non-rhythmic interactions. We report on communicative behaviours in social and sexual contexts, as found in dyads of humans, non-human primates, non-primate mammals, birds, anurans and insects. We discuss observed instances of rhythm in dyadic interactions, identify knowledge gaps and propose suggestions for future research. We find that most studies on rhythmicity in interactive signals mainly focus on one modality (acoustic or visual) and we suggest more work should be performed on multimodal signals. Although the social functions of interactive rhythms have been fairly well described, developmental research on rhythms used to regulate social interactions is still lacking. Future work should also focus on identifying the exact timing mechanisms involved. Rhythmic signalling behaviours are widespread and critical in regulating social interactions across taxa, but many questions remain unexplored. A multidisciplinary, comparative cross-species approach may help provide answers. This article is part of the theme issue ‘Synchrony and rhythm interaction: from the brain to behavioural ecology’.
Animals communicating interactively with conspecifics often time their broadcasts to avoid overlapping interference, to emit leading, as opposed to following, signals or to synchronize their signalling rhythms. Each of these adjustments becomes more difficult as the number of interactants increases beyond a pair. Among acoustic species, insects and anurans generally deal with the problem of group signalling by means of ‘selective attention’ in which they focus on several close or conspicuous neighbours and ignore the rest. In these animals, where signalling and receiving are often dictated by sex, the process of selective attention in signallers may have a parallel counterpart in receivers, which also focus on close neighbours. In birds and mammals, local groups tend to be extended families or clans, and group signalling may entail complex timing mechanisms that allow for attention to all individuals. In general, the mechanisms that allow animals to communicate in groups appear to be fully interwoven with the basic process of rhythmic signalling. This article is part of the theme issue ‘Synchrony and rhythm interaction: from the brain to behavioural ecology’.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.
hi@scite.ai
10624 S. Eastern Ave., Ste. A-614
Henderson, NV 89052, USA
Copyright © 2024 scite LLC. All rights reserved.
Made with 💙 for researchers
Part of the Research Solutions Family.