BACKGROUND: Follicular lymphoma (FL) is generally characterized by a moderate metabolic activity (FDG-avidity) in nodal and extra-nodal sites and by the frequent detection of residual disease in post-treatment PET scans. Since median age at diagnosis is over 60 years, in many FL patients several conditions that affect the elderly often occur in combination with the tumor, thus complicating and limiting the use of conventional imaging for lymphoma staging and response assessment. For this reason, the choice of the imaging technique should take into account clinical needs (preservation of renal function, reduction of diagnostic radiation exposure) as well as the necessity to constrain health care costs. OBJECTIVE: The aim of the study was to investigate if there is any advantage in the use of contrast-enhanced CT (ceCT) vs. unenhanced low-dose CT (ldCT) in routine protocols for end-of-therapy PET/CT evaluation of patients with FL. METHODS: Thirty FL patients who underwent end-of-therapy PET/CT protocol with ldCT and ceCT were analyzed retrospectively. Two different observers evaluated PET/ldCT and PET/ceCT in a blinded manner. Number and sites of nodal or extra-nodal disease were compared, using PET/ceCT as gold standard in order to evaluate if the type of CT could result in changes of the DS and therapeutic strategy. RESULTS: In 26 of 30 patients (87%; 95% confidence interval, 73%-98%), PET/ldCT showed the same number and sites of lesions highlighted by PET/ceCT. The inter-observer concordance and overall concordance between imaging procedures were excellent with a very high Cohen's kappa (respectively 0.82 and 0.83). 97% of lesions (103/107) were found by PET/ldCT and in 4 of 30 patients (13%) PET/ceCT provided additional nodal lesions in the mesenteric and iliac regions (3 mesenteric nodes and 1 iliac node; <1%). In these 4 patients, DS and consequently the therapeutic strategy were not changed after additional ceCT findings. PET/ldCT accuracy, sensibility, specificity, positive predictive value and negative predictive value and NPV were respectively 87%, 83%, 100%,100% and 60%. CONCLUSION: Our results indicate that the clinical impact of PET/ceCT in assessing end-therapy evaluation in FL is limited. The PET/ldCT could be suggested as primary imaging modality of choice, thus limiting the acquisition of PET/ceCT images only for doubtful cases of residual disease in mesenteric area (represented solely by 13 % in our series). This diagnostic approach would be less expensive, minimize diagnostic radiation exposure, and preserve renal function. Disclosures No relevant conflicts of interest to declare.
Despite follicular lymphoma (FL) is frequently characterized by a moderate increase of glucose metabolism, PET/CT examinations provides valuable information for staging and response assessment of the disease. The aim of the study was to assess and compare the diagnostic performance of PET/ldCT and PET/ceCT, respectively, in evaluating FL patients at the end of treatment. Fifty FL consecutive patients who underwent end-of-therapy PET/CT with both ldCT and ceCT were analyzed. Two blinded observers independently assessed PET/ldCT and PET/ceCT applying the Deauville score (DS) and Lugano classification criteria. PET imaging obtained after the end-of-treatment (EoT) was classified as showing PET and ce-CT matched response (concordant imaging group, CIG) or PET and ce-CT unmatched response (discordant imaging group, DIG). Relapse rate and Event-Free Survival (EFS) were compared between CIG and DIG patients. Overall, no differences in metabolic response classification were observed between PET/ldCT and PET/ceCT. In 13 (26%) patients PET/ceCT identified additional FDG-negative nodal lesions in mesenteric, retroperitoneal and iliac regions. However, in all cases, final DS remained unchanged and the additional results did not modify the following therapeutic decision. Among patients, who obtained complete metabolic response a comparable rate of relapse was registered in DIG 3/13 (23%) and CIG subgroups 5/20 (25%) [p = 0.899]. In all 3 DIG cohort patients who relapsed the recurrent disease involved also, but not exclusively, PET negative lymph nodes detected by ceCT. In overall population metabolic response defined by PET/ldCT predicted EFS [76% (group of patients with metabolic response) vs 35% (group of patients with residual disease), p = 0.0013] significantly better than ceCT-Based response assessment [75% (group of patients with complete response) vs 53% (group of patients with residual disease), p = 0.06]. Our study demonstrates a negligible diagnostic and predictive value of ceCT performed in addition to standard 18FDG PET/ldCT for EoT response evaluation in FLs. PET/ldCT should be performed as first-line imaging procedure, also in patients with prevalent abdominal and pelvic involvement, limiting the acquisition of ceCT in selected cases. This tailored approach would contribute to avoid useless radiation exposure and preserve renal function of patients.
Purpose: Despite follicular lymphoma (FL) is frequently characterized by a moderate increase of glucose metabolism, PET/CT examinations provides valuable information for staging and response assessment of the disease. The aim of the study was to assess and compare the diagnostic performance of PET/ldCT and PET/ceCT, respectively, in evaluating FL patients at the end of treatment. Methods: Fifty FL consecutive patients who underwent end-of-therapy PET/CT with both ldCT and ceCT were analyzed. Two blinded observers independently assessed PET/ldCT and PET/ceCT applying the Deauville score (DS) and Lugano classification criteria. PET imaging obtained after the end-of-treatment (EoT) was classified as showing PET and ce-CT matched response (concordant imaging group, CIG) or PET and ce-CT unmatched response (discordant imaging group, DIG). Relapse rate and Event-Free Survival (EFS) were compared between CIG and DIG patients. Results: Overall, no differences in metabolic response classification were observed between PET/ldCT and PET/ceCT. In 13 (26%) patients PET/ceCT identified additional FDG-negative nodal lesions in mesenteric, retroperitoneal and iliac regions. However, in all cases, final DS remained unchanged and the additional results did not modify the following therapeutic decision. Among patients, who obtained complete metabolic response a comparable rate of relapse was registered in DIG 3/13 (23%) and CIG subgroups 5/20 (25%) [p = 0.899]. In all 3 DIG cohort patients who relapsed the recurrent disease involved also, but not exclusively, PET negative lymph nodes detected by ceCT. In overall population metabolic response defined by PET/ldCT predicted EFS (76% vs 35%, p = 0.0013) significantly better than ceCT-Based response assessment (75% vs 53%, p = 0.06). Conclusion: Our study demonstrates a negligible diagnostic and predictive value of ceCT performed in addition to standard 18FDG PET/ldCT for EoT response evaluation in FLs. PET/ldCT should be performed as first-line imaging procedure, also in patients with prevalent abdominal and pelvic involvement, limiting the acquisition of ceCT in selected cases. This tailored approach would contribute to avoid useless radiation exposure and preserve renal function of patients.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.
hi@scite.ai
10624 S. Eastern Ave., Ste. A-614
Henderson, NV 89052, USA
Copyright © 2024 scite LLC. All rights reserved.
Made with 💙 for researchers
Part of the Research Solutions Family.