No abstract

Digital terrain model (DTM) generation is essential to recreating terrain morphology once the external elements are removed. Traditional survey methods are still used to collect accurate geographic data on the land surface. Given the emergence of unmanned aerial vehicles (UAVs) equipped with low-cost digital cameras and better photogrammetric methods for digital mapping, efficient approaches are necessary to allow rapid land surveys with high accuracy. This paper provides a review, complemented with the authors’ experience, regarding the UAV photogrammetric process and field survey parameters for DTM generation using popular commercial photogrammetric software to process images obtained with fixed-wing or multicopter UAVs. We analyzed the quality and accuracy of the DTMs based on four categories: (i) the UAV system (UAV platforms and camera); (ii) flight planning and image acquisition (flight altitude, image overlap, UAV speed, orientation of the flight line, camera configuration, and georeferencing); (iii) photogrammetric DTM generation (software, image alignment, dense point cloud generation, and ground filtering); (iv) geomorphology and land use/cover. For flat terrain, UAV photogrammetry provided a horizontal root mean square error (RMSE) between 1 to 3 × the ground sample distance (GSD) and a vertical RMSE between 1 to 4.5 × GSD, and, for complex topography, a horizontal RMSE between 1 to 7 × GSD and a vertical RMSE between 1.5 to 5 × GSD. Finally, we stress that UAV photogrammetry can provide DTMs with high accuracy when the photogrammetric process variables are optimized.

Introduction: The FAO-56 Penman-Monteith (PM) is one of the most solid and commonly used methods for estimating reference evapotranspiration (ETo); however, it requires meteorological data that are not always available, so an alternative is the use of reanalysis data. Objective: To estimate the error that the NASA-POWER (NP) system data can generate in the ETo of the Comarca Lagunera, Mexico. Methodology: Daily and decadal average ETo were estimated in five different ways. In each case, a different method was used to estimate ETo (FAO-56 PM or Hargreaves and Samani [HS]) and a different meteorological data source (measured, NP data or combination of both). Results: NP data can be used to provide temperature, solar radiation and relative humidity variables, but not wind speed. The NP data overestimate the measured ETo, an RMSE of 1.15 and 0.89 mm∙d-1 was found for daily and decadal periods, respectively. Limitations of the study: A grid error analysis could not be carried out because the number of stations is limited. Originality: The use of reanalysis data to estimate ETo has not been analyzed locally. Conclusion: When measured data are not available, NP data and the HS equation can be used. When using the FAO-56 PM method and NP data, the in situ wind speed must be available.

No abstract

No abstract

The vegetation indices (VIs) estimated from remotely sensed data are simple and based on effective algorithms for quantitative and qualitative evaluations of the dynamics of biophysical crop variables such as vegetation cover, leaf area, vigor and development, and many others. Over the last decade, many VIs have been proposed and validated to enhance the vegetation signal by reducing the noise from effects produced either by the soil or by vegetation such as brightness, shadows, color, etc. VIs are commonly calculated from satellite images such as ones from Landsat and Sentinel-2 because of their medium resolution and free availability. However, despite the VIs being fairly simple algorithms, it can take hours to calculate them for an established agricultural area, mainly due to the pre-processing of the images (including atmospheric corrections, the detection of clouds and shadows), size and download time of the images, and the capacity of the computer equipment used. Time increases as the number of images increases. In this sense, the free to use Google Earth Engine (GEE) platform was here used to develop an application called VICAL to calculate 23 VIs map (VIs commonly used in agricultural applications) and time series of any agricultural area in the world with images (cloud-free) from Landsat and Sentinel-2 data. It was found that VICAL can calculate these 23 VIs accurately, and shows the potential of the GEE cloud-based tools using multispectral dataset to assess many spectral VIs. This tool is very beneficial for researchers with poor access to satellite data or in institutions with a lack of computational infrastructure to handle the large volumes of satellite datasets, since it is not necessary for the user writing a single line of code. The VICAL is open-access image analysis platform that can be modified to carry out more complex analysis or adapt it to a specific VI application.

Remote sensing-based crop monitoring has evolved unprecedentedly to supply multispectral imagery with high spatial-temporal resolution for the assessment of crop evapotranspiration (ETc). Several methodologies have shown a high correlation between the Vegetation Indices (VIs) and the crop coefficient (Kc). This work analyzes the estimation of the crop coefficient (Kc) as a spectral function of the product of two variables: VIs and green vegetation cover fraction (fv). Multispectral images from experimental maize plots were classified to separate pixels into three classes (vegetation, shade and soil) using the OBIA (Object Based Image Analysis) approach. Only vegetation pixels were used to estimate the VIs and fv variables. The spectral Kcfv:VI models were compared with Kc based on Cumulative Growing Degree Days (CGDD) (Kc-cGDD). The maximum average values of Normalized Difference Vegetation Index (NDVI), WDRVI, amd EVI2 indices during the growing season were 0.77, 0.21, and 1.63, respectively. The results showed that the spectral Kcfv:VI model showed a strong linear correlation with Kc-cGDD (R2 > 0.80). The model precision increases with plant densities, and the Kcfv:NDVI with 80,000 plants/ha had the best fitting performance (R2 = 0.94 and RMSE = 0.055). The results indicate that the use of spectral models to estimate Kc based on high spatial and temporal resolution UAV-images, using only green pixels to compute VI and fv crop variables, offers a powerful and simple tool for ETc assessment to support irrigation scheduling in agricultural areas.

La pequeña irrigación (PI) en México ha sido fundamental para su desarrollo agrícola. La PI surge principalmente de organizaciones de riego tradicional con autogobierno; sin embargo, la intervención del Estado reconfiguró su base autogestiva para reagruparlas “institucionalmente” como Unidades de Riego (UR). El objetivo de este trabajo fue caracterizar la tipología de las UR en términos de la fuente de abastecimiento de agua y su tamaño. A diferencia de los Distrito de Riego (DR), las UR son autogestivas y abastecidas principalmente de aguas subterráneas, y han estado marginadas de la intervención del Estado, por lo que la información sobre el inventario de las UR es limitada. Existe una gran diferenciación de las UR según su fuente de abastecimiento, tamaño y localización. Las UR se encuentran muy dispersas y predominan las UR monousuario abastecidas por aguas subterráneas operadas por usuarios independientes con limitada solidaridad hídrica, lo cual dificulta su estudio, seguimiento y apoyo.