No abstract

We report a case of a 35-year old male patient with a tumor located in the deep dermis on his forearm. The lesion was completely excised but recurred 4 years later.The patient showed no signs of neurofibromatosis type 1. The morphology and immunophenotype of the tumor corresponded to the recently characterized group of soft tissue spindle cell lesions defined by a relatively uniform cytomorphology, patternless architecture, conspicuous stromal and perivascular hyalinization, S100 and CD34 coexpression and recurrent fusions involving RAF1, BRAF, and NTRK1/2 genes.Using a 592-gene panel and massively parallel next-generation sequencing platform, we initially detected only NF1 gene mutation in our case. However, further molecular testing with Archer fusion assay revealed a novel NCOA4-RET gene fusion, adding it to the list of multiple kinase fusions originally reported in these tumors. Although break-apart FISH showed false negative result due to the presence of intrachromosomal rearrangement, RT-PCR confirmed the fusion transcript. Knowing the exact fusion is of great clinical importance especially for patients within the aggressive subset of these neoplasms that could be treated with selective kinase inhibitors.The presented case underscores the benefits of massively parallel sequencing as the types and number of gene fusions these tumors can potentially harbor render singlegene assays such as FISH impractical, and in this particular case, also insensitive. K E Y W O R D Sinfantile fibrosarcoma, kinase fusions, NCOA4-RET, NF1 gene mutation, S100 and CD34 positive spindle cell tumor, soft tissues

Conclusion:We expand the current knowledge on PRDM10-STT and SCD34FT and provide additional evidence for considering them as overlapping entities.

No abstract

No abstract

No abstract

No abstract

Inflammatory leiomyosarcoma (ILMS) is a very rare soft tissue tumor that usually follows an indolent clinical course, but long-term follow-up studies are lacking. Recent publications primarily focused on its genetic profile characterized by a near haploid genome. One study also showed these tumors to have upregulation of genes known to be crucial for skeletal muscle differentiation. Nevertheless, immunohistochemical expression of skeletal muscle markers, as well as markers that would help to distinguish ILMS from a long list of relevant differential diagnostic entities, has not been extensively studied. Nine cases of ILMS were collected and stained by a broad IHC panel which, besides others, contained MyoD1, myogenin, and PAX-7. A subset of cases was also analyzed by 2 different NGS assays and by MDM2 fluorescence in situ hybridization. Five male and 4 female patients ranged in age from 25 to 54 years (mean, 36 years). The tumors showed a predilection for intramuscular sites of the lower limbs (n = 4) and back (n = 2), whereas the remaining 3 cases affected an unspecified skeletal muscle, lung, and omentum. Follow-up with an average length of 10.6 years (range 0.5-22) was available for 8 patients. The omental tumor spread locally within the abdominal cavity, but the patient has been free of disease 7 years after treatment. None of the 5 patients with somatic soft tissue tumors (and follow-up longer than 1.5 years) had either recurrence or metastasis. Immunohistochemical studies revealed a substantial expression of skeletal muscle markers in almost all cases. This phenotype coupled with a highly characteristic genotype and significantly more indolent clinical behavior as compared with conventional leiomyosarcoma of deep soft tissue offers a strong rationale to change the current nomenclature. Based on the clinicopathological features and gene expression profile, we propose the name low-grade inflammatory myogenic tumor.