Mitral and tufted cells are the 2 types of output neurons of the main olfactory bulb. They are located in distinct layers, have distinct projection patterns of their dendrites and axons, and likely have distinct relationships with the intrabulbar inhibitory circuits. They could thus be functionally distinct and process different aspects of olfactory information. To examine this possibility, we compared the odor-evoked responses of identified single units recorded in the mitral cell layer (MCL units), in the core of the external plexiform layer (not at the glomerular border tufted cells), or at the glomerular border of this layer (GB tufted cells) of the entire olfactory bulb. Differences between mitral and tufted cells were observed only when subtle aspects of the responses were explored, such as the firing rate per respiratory cycle or the distribution of firing activity along the respiratory cycle. By contrast, more clear differences were found when the 2 subtypes of tufted cells were examined separately. GB units were significantly more responsive, had significantly higher firing activity, and showed greater activity at the transition between inspiration and expiration. The projection-type tufted cells situated closer to the entrance of the olfactory bulb may thus form a distinct physiological class of output neurons and differ from mitral cells and other tufted cells in the manner of processing olfactory information.
The spontaneous activity and impulse conduction velocities of mitral and tufted cells were compared in the entire main olfactory bulb of freely breathing, anesthetized rats. Single units in the mitral cell body layer (MCL) and external plexiform layer (EPL) were identified by antidromic activation from the lateral olfactory tract (LOT), electrode track reconstructions based on dye marking, and the waveform of LOT-evoked field potentials. Using the track reconstructions, EPL units were further subdivided into glomerular border (GB) and not at the glomerular border (notGB) cells. For conduction velocity, significant differences were only found between MCL and GB units and not between MCL and all EPL units or between MCL and notGB units. For spontaneous activity, no significant differences were found between the different unit groups regarding the mean, maximum, or relative maximum rate per 100-ms bin. By contrast, they showed a differential modulation of their firing activity by respiration. GB but not notGB units had a significantly higher mean rate during the respiratory cycle than MCL units with significantly more activity during inspiration. Thus, mitral and tufted cells are similar in their impulse conduction velocity and spontaneous activity, though the more superficially placed GB cells exhibit differences. A comparison of odor responses in these cell types in the companion paper also points to differences between mitral and superficial projection tufted cells.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.
hi@scite.ai
10624 S. Eastern Ave., Ste. A-614
Henderson, NV 89052, USA
Copyright © 2024 scite LLC. All rights reserved.
Made with 💙 for researchers
Part of the Research Solutions Family.