IntroductionPsoriasis is an immune-mediated, chronic, inflammatory disease, which has a substantial humanistic and economic burden. This study aimed to assess the impact of this disease on health-related quality of life (HRQoL), work productivity, and direct and indirect costs from a societal perspective among Brazilian patients.MethodsThis is a cross-sectional, observational, multicenter study, enrolling patients with moderate to severe plaque psoriasis according to physician evaluation. Data collection was performed from December 2015 to November 2016 through face-to-face interviews using a structured questionnaire and five standardized patient-reported outcomes instruments. Direct costs were estimated by multiplying the amount of resources used (12-month recall period) by the corresponding unit cost. Indirect costs were grouped in two time horizons: annual costs (income reduction and absenteeism) and lifetime costs (demission and early retirement).ResultsA total of 188 patients with moderate to severe plaque psoriasis were included, with mean age of 48.0 (SD 13.1). “Anxiety and depression” and “pain and discomfort” were the most impaired dimensions, according to the EuroQol Five-Dimension-Three-Level (EQ-5D-3L). The highest effect was found for “symptoms and feelings” [mean (SD) 2.4 (1.7)] Dermatology Life Quality Index (DLQI) subscale. Psoriatic arthritis (PsA) presence and biologic-naïve status were associated with worse HRQoL. Presenteeism was more frequent than absenteeism, according to the Work Productivity and Activity Impairment questionnaire-General Health (WPAI-GH) [17.4% vs. 6.3%], while physical demands and time management were the most affected Work Limitations Questionnaire (WLQ) subscales [means (SD) 23.5 (28.5) and 17.7 (24.9), respectively]. The estimated annual cost per patient was USD 4034. Direct medical costs accounted for 87.7% of this estimate, direct non-medical costs for 2.4%, and indirect costs for 9.9%.ConclusionsResults evidenced that moderate to severe plaque psoriasis imposes substantial costs to society. Our data showed that this disease negatively affects both work productivity and HRQoL of Brazilian patients. Subgroups with PsA and biologic-naïve patients presented lower HRQoL, showing the impact of this comorbidity and the relevance of biologics in psoriasis treatment.FundingNovartis Biociências S.A.Electronic supplementary materialThe online version of this article (10.1007/s12325-019-01049-7) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.
Background Ungual warts are considered the most common benign nail tumour, and they are caused by the human papillomavirus. Despite the numerous treatments reported in the medical literature, ungual warts are considered frustrating, with high relapse rates and a potential risk of nail dystrophy. Bleomycin is a therapeutic option showing a good safety profile and high cure rates. Objective To evaluate the efficacy of electrochemotherapy using intralesional bleomycin for the treatment of ungual warts in comparison with intralesional bleomycin alone and describe the side‐effects related to the use of both techniques. Methods This was a prospective, randomized, double‐blind, controlled clinical trial. Forty‐four 18‐ to 60‐year‐old female and male patients with ungual warts of only one finger were included. The patients were divided into two treatment groups: GA – intralesional bleomycin; and GB – electroporation and intralesional bleomycin. Following a single application, the patients were followed up for 180 days. Results The patients’ mean age was 36 years for GA and 37 years for GB. Most patients were female (68%). Of 22 patients in GA completing the study, 11 (50%) achieved the cure, while 18 (85.7%) of 21 patients completing the study in GB showed cure. A significant association of patients with or without cure after the GA and GB treatments (P = 0.022) was observed. None of the patients in either group had systemic side‐effects. Independent of the technique used, all the participants considered the adverse effects tolerable. Conclusion The intralesional use of bleomycin associated with electroporation for the treatment of ungual warts (both periungual and subungual) showed a statistically superior cure when compared with intralesional bleomycin alone. Side‐effects were more frequently observed in the electrochemotherapy with bleomycin group than in the bleomycin monotherapy group.
Brazil ranked second in the world for the number of aesthetic procedures in 2019. Five case reports of delayed hypersensitivity reaction to hyaluronic acid dermal filler against COVID-19 vaccines are presented. Additional vaccination for new variants, including omicron, will be necessary, therefore aesthetic professionals should be aware of this possibility and advise patients accordingly.
Introduction: Insufficient hair growth after hair transplant, as well as erythema and perifollicular scaling, may be diagnosed as lichen planopilaris and treated as such based on clinical and histopathological findings. The purpose of this study is to observe graft biopsies of patients after uncomplicated hair transplants and to discuss if histological findings are enough to diagnose lichen planopilaris. Methods and Results: Eight patients diagnosed with androgenetic alopecia who were submitted to hair transplant were enrolled. In each of the participants, a scalp biopsy was performed in the receptor area and in the adjacent area. Biopsies were performed between 6 months and 1 year after surgery. Exams were analyzed by 3 pathologists. The t test was performed for paired observations, comparing the transplanted and the nontransplanted area for lymphocytic infiltrate and fibrosis. The significance level was considered as 5% (p < 0.05). Four of 8 participants had perifollicular lymphocytic infiltrate, from moderate to dense intensity in the recipient area. Fibrosis was seen in 6 patients. These findings were not seen in the control area. Conclusions: It is questioned whether lymphocytic infiltrate and fibrosis may be expected in patients who are submitted to normal hair transplants.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.
hi@scite.ai
10624 S. Eastern Ave., Ste. A-614
Henderson, NV 89052, USA
Copyright © 2024 scite LLC. All rights reserved.
Made with 💙 for researchers
Part of the Research Solutions Family.