No abstract

The mandatory adoption of International Financial Reporting Standards (IFRS) on January 1, 2005 aimed to improve the quality of financial reporting in Greece, which had been regularly criticized for the practice of earnings management and the ineffectiveness of external auditing. However, the unusual characteristics of the economic environment and institutional setting of code-law oriented Greece, has made the attempt even more challenging. To investigate the role of auditors in potentially approving managers' opportunistic behaviour in the post-IFRS period, we examine the relationship between earnings management, measured by signed discretionary accruals, and auditor reporting, measured by audit firm size (Big 4 vs. non-Big 4) and audit opinion type (unqualified vs. qualified). Using a sample of firms listedon the Athens Stock Exchange over a five-year period, we find that the size of the audit firm does not affect the level of earnings management, and the audit opinion qualification is not issued in response to management's opportunistic behaviour. The interpretation of the results is conditional on the Greek context, where the economic bonding of auditors with their clients is strong, investor protection is low, enforcement mechanisms are weak and there is low litigation and reputation loss, even in the post-IFRS period.

This study examines the relationship between audit opinions and earnings management, as measured by discretionary accruals, for listed firms on the Athens Stock Exchange (ASE). We divide the qualified audit opinions into two categories:qualified for the going-concern uncertainty and qualified for other reasons. The results indicate that audit opinions are not related to earnings management. Client financial characteristics, such as profitability and size are determinants of the going-concern audit opinion decision. The decision of auditors to issue qualified opinions for other reasons is explained by the type of audit opinion issued in the previous year.

No abstract

No abstract