As efforts to end systemic racism gain momentum across various contexts, it is critical to consider anti-racist steps that will be required to improve psychological science. Current scientific practices serve to maintain white supremacy with significant and impactful consequences. Extant research practices reinforce norms of homogeneity within BIPOC (Black, Indigenous, and other People of Color) populations, segregate theories and methods derived from BIPOC groups, apply disparate standards to the evaluation of research on White vs. BIPOC populations, and discourage BIPOC scholars from pursuing research careers. Perhaps consequently, mental and physical health disparities remain largely unimproved. In this article we present examples of how epistemic oppression exists within psychological science, including how science is conducted, reported, reviewed, and disseminated. Specific recommendations are offered for many stakeholders, including those involved in the production, reporting, and gatekeeping of science as well as consumers of science. Additionally, we present a diversity accountability index for journals with potential benchmarks for measuring progress as one strategy to promote dialogue and action, challenge inequity, and upend the influence of white supremacy in psychological science.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.