No abstract

No abstract

Background: European Guidelines on Myocardial Revascularization recommend clopidogrel loading dose added to acetylsalicylic acid in elective percutaneous coronary interventions (PCIs). However, there is few evidence supporting this recommendation and other P2Y12 inhibitors have not been tested in these patients. Purpose: To evaluate the effectiveness and safety of different loading doses of clopidogrel and ticagrelor in patients without double antiplatelet therapy and stable coronary artery disease (SCAD) undergoing elective PCI. Methods: Retrospective study of 147 consecutive patients with SCAD undergoing elective PCI. Loading P2Y12 inhibitor doses evaluated were: clopidogrel 600 mg, clopidogrel 300 mg, clopidogrel 150 mg, and ticagrelor 180 mg. We analyzed the occurrence of major adverse cardiovascular events and periprocedural myocardial infarction. Results: One hundred twenty-five patients were treated with clopidogrel (16 with clopidogrel 150 mg, 7 with clopidogrel 300 mg, and 93 with clopidogrel 600 mg) and 21 with ticagrelor 180 mg at the catheterization laboratory. The ticagrelor group had a significantly lower postprocedural peak of troponin-I (0.7 ± 3.4 vs. 0.3 ± 0.7 ng/mL; P = 0.02). There were no differences between groups in terms of major bleeding and hemoglobin drop after PCI (0.6 ± 0.8 vs. 4 ± 0.6; P = 0.8). The median of follow-up was 17 months (interquartile range 9–32.7). At the end of follow-up, major adverse cardiovascular event rate was not different between groups. Conclusions: In patients without dual antiplatelet therapy undergoing elective PCI, the use of ticagrelor showed lower postprocedural myocardial injury without more bleeding complications.

No abstract

Background: Both stent length and stent overlap are associated with worse outcomes in the percutaneous treatment of diffuse coronary artery disease (dCAD). However, evidence comparing these issues is scarce. We aimed to compare the results between the use of single very long stent (VLS) and ≥2 overlapping stents (OS) in the treatment of dCAD. Methods: Seven hundred twenty-four consecutive lesions were included: 275 treated with a single VLS (≥40 mm) and 449 with ≥2 OS. Procedural characteristics were assessed, and survival analysis was performed to compare the incidence of major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE; composite of cardiovascular death, nonfatal myocardial infarction, target lesion revascularization [TLR], or stent thrombosis) during a median follow-up of 31 months. Results: Procedures with VLS required less contrast volume (268 ± 122 vs 302 ± 113 cm3; P < .01), fluoroscopy time (16 ± 8 vs 21 ± 16 minutes; P < .01), and procedure duration (37 ± 18 vs 47 ± 27 minutes; P < .01) than the OS procedures. The VLS group showed lower incidence of MACE (4.4% vs 10.7%; P < .01), driven mainly by lower TLR rate (1.1% vs 4.7%; P < .01). The use of OS was an independent predictor of MACE. Conclusions: In this study, the use of VLS for the treatment of dCAD was associated with better outcomes compared to OS.