The aim of the study is to assess the rate of any potential adverse effects on women who became pregnant under cabergoline (CAB) treatment and to evaluate any effects on the embryo-fetal development and on children who were born from mothers exposed to CAB in early weeks of gestation. Observational, retrospective and multicenter study on 103 pregnancies in 90 women with hyperprolactinemia. All patients were under CAB at conception. Serum prolactin at baseline was between 30 and 1921 ng/ml. Duration of therapy before pregnancy ranged from 1 to 120 months and doses ranged from 0.125 to 5 mg/week. Fetal exposure ranged from 3 to 25 weeks, 96.9% of patients received CAB during the first trimester of pregnancy and the rest until the second one. No significant complications during pregnancy were found. Seven women (7.2%) had spontaneous abortions. Preterm deliveries were recorded in eight (8.8%), only one with low weight for gestational age. Neonatal abnormalities were observed in 3 (3.6%): 1 major (Down syndrome) and 2 minor malformations (umbilical and inguinal hernia). We were able to asses the children's development in 61. Two had epilepsy and two had Pervasive Developmental Disorder (PDD). No significantly higher frequency of complications was found in pregnancies and/or offspring exposed to CAB than in the normal population. We registered 2 abnormalities in the development of the children: epilepsy and PDD. Larger series of patients are needed to assess the safety of this drug during pregnancy.

The present study reports the case of a 70-year-old Caucasian man who was referred to the Military Hospital of Buenos Aires for evaluation of a giant sellar-extrasellar mass with extension in the right temporal lobe and compression of the third ventricle. Patient was initially responsive to cabergoline with reduction of prolactin levels and shrinkage of tumor burden for at least 36 months. Thereafter, prolactin levels and tumor size increased even though cabergoline dosage was increased. Transcraneal surgery was performed at 56 months of treatment. Prolactin levels and tumor proliferation did not subside and the patient died 14 months later. High GH and IGF-I levels were observed in the late stages of tumor development, with no evidence of acromegalic features. Immunohistochemistry of the excised tumor revealed strong immunoreactivity for VEGF and FGF-2, two potent angiogenic factors, and CD31 (an endothelial marker) indicating high vascularization of the adenoma.

Objective: To describe the long term safety and efficacy of pegvisomant (PEGV), and the predictors of treatment response in patients with acromegaly in the real life setting. Subjects and methods: We retrospectively reviewed the clinical, hormonal and radiological data of acromegalic patients treated with PEGV in 17 Argentine centers. Results: Seventy-five patients (age range 22-77, 51 females) with acromegaly have been treated with PEGV for up to 118 months (median 27 months). Before PEGV, 97.3% of patients had been treated with medical therapy, surgery and/or radiotherapy, two patients had no previous treatment. At that time, all patients had an IGF-1 above the upper normal limit (ULN) (mean 2.4 x ULN ± 0.98, range 1.25-7). At diagnosis of acromegaly 84% presented macroadenomas, prior to PEGV only 23,5% of patients remained with tumor remnant > 1 cm, the remaining showed normal or less than 1 cm images. Disease control (IGF-1 ≤ 1.2 x ULN) was achieved in 62.9% of patients with a mean dose of 11.8 mg/day. Thirty-four patients (45%) received PEGV monotherapy, while 41 (55%) received combined therapy with either somatostatin analogues and/or cabergoline. Adverse events related to PEGV were: local injection site reaction in 5.3%, elevated liver enzymes in 9.3%, and tumor size growth in 9.8%. Pre-PEGV IGF-I level was the only predictor of treatment response: 2.1 x ULN vs 2.8 x ULN in controlled and uncontrolled patients respectively (p < 0.001). Conclusion: this long term experience indicates PEGV treatment was highly effective and safe in our series of Argentine patients with acromegaly refractory to standard therapies. Arch Endocrinol Metab.

Objetive:The aim was to assess the evolution of tumor size and prolactin (PRL) levels in patients with micro and macroprolactinomas diagnosed and treated with dopamine agonists during fertile age, and the effects of suspension of drugs after menopause. Subjects and methods: Retrospective study, 29 patients with prolactinomas, 22 microadenomas and 7 macroadenomas, diagnosed during their fertile age were studied in their menopause; treatment was stopped in this period. Age at menopause was 49 ± 3.6 years. The average time of treatment was 135 ± 79 months. The time of follow-up after treatment suspension was 4 to 192 months. Results: Pre-treatment PRL levels in micro and macroadenomas were 119 ± 57 ng/mL and 258 ± 225 ng/mL, respectively. During menopause after treatment suspension, and at the latest follow-up: in microadenomas PRL levels were 23 ± 13 ng/mL and 16 ± 5.7 ng/mL, respectively; in macroadenomas, PRL levels were 20 ± 6.6 ng/mL and 25 ± 18 ng/mL, respectively. In menopause after treatment suspension, the microadenomas had disappeared in 9/22 and had decreased in 13/22. In the group of patients whose tumor had decreased, in the latest follow-up, tumors disappeared in 7/13 and remained unchanged in 6/13. In macroadenomas, after treatment suspension 3/7 had disappeared, 3/7 decreased and 1/7 remained unchanged. In the latest control in the 3 patients whose tumor decreased, disappeared in 1/3, decreased in 1/3 and there was no change in the remaining. Conclusions: Normal PRL levels and sustained reduction or disappearance of adenomas were achieved in most of patients, probably due to the decrease of estrogen levels. Dopamine agonists might be stopped after menopause in patients with prolactinomas.Arch Endocrinol Metab. 2016;60(1):42-6

No abstract

The aim of our study was to evaluate two different methodologies in IGF-I levels determination, its correlation with GH nadir in OGTT <1 and <0.4 ng/ml and with clinical symptoms in acromegalic patients. We analyzed 37 patients. Sixteen patients had not undergone any kind of treatment (Group 1). Twenty-one patients underwent surgery as primary treatment, and after that, some of them another kind of treatment (except pegvisomant) (Group 2). Serum IGF-I levels were measured by Immulite-1000 (IMM) and by an immunoradiometric assay (DSL) and, GH by immunochemiluminometric assay. IGF-I levels by IMM and by DSL showed a significant difference. When we analyzed in both groups the concordance by crosstabs-Kappa coefficients, between different parameters, GH nadir <1 and <0.4 ng/ml with IGF-I by DSL and IMM showed concordance in group 1, but in group 2 only GH nadir <1 and <0.4 ng/ml had a weak concordance with IGF-I by IMM. When we analyzed clinical symptoms in the patients and, GH nadir <1 and <0.4 ng/ml and IGF-I levels by both methodologies, more than 90% of clinically active patients had abnormal GH response or/and elevated IGF-I levels in group 1, but less than 70% in group 2. In the 8 patients under medical treatment, GH nadir was higher than 0.4 ng/ml in all patients, and IGF-I levels were elevated in 8/8 by DSL and in 6/8 by IMM. In conclusion, discrepant GH and IGF-I levels in the diagnosis and follow-up of patients with acromegaly requires consideration of many factors that influence these parameters.

Pegvisomant (PEGv) is a growth hormone receptor antagonist approved for the treatment of acromegaly; one of its documented adverse effects is reversible elevation of hepatic enzymes. We report a 39-year-old male acromegalic patient with a pituitary macroadenoma who underwent transsphenoidal surgery. The patient's condition improved but GH and IGF-I levels did not normalize; as a consequence, we first administered dopamine agonists and then somatostatin receptor ligands (SRLs) with poor response. PEGv 15 mg every other day was added to lanreotide 120 mg monthly. The patient developed a severe hepatitis five months after starting the combination therapy. Elevated ferritin, iron, and transferrin saturation suggested probable hepatitis due to haemochromatosis. We performed a liver biopsy which showed an acute cholestatic hepatitis consistent with toxic etiology. A heterozygous genotype UGT1A1 ⁎ 28 polymorphism associated with Gilbert's syndrome was also found in this Argentine patient. The predominant clinical presentation resembled an acute cholestatic hepatitis associated with severe hemosiderosis, a different and new pattern of PEGv hepatotoxicity.

No abstract