Background One goal of THA is to restore the anatomic hip center, which can be achieved in hips with developmental dysplasia by placing cups at the level of the native acetabulum. However, this might require adjuvant procedures such as femoral shortening osteotomy. Another option is to place the cup at the high hip center, potentially reducing surgical complexity. Currently, no clear consensus exists regarding which of these cup positions might offer better functional outcomes or long-term survival. Question/purpose We performed a systematic review to determine whether (1) functional outcomes as measured by the Harris hip score, (2) revision incidence, and (3) complications that do not result in revision differ based on the position of the acetabular cup (high hip center versus anatomic hip center) in patients undergoing THA for developmental dysplasia of the hip (DDH). Methods We performed a systematic review using Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-analysis (PRISMA) guidelines, including studies comparing the functional outcomes, revision incidence, and complications of primary THA in dysplastic hips with acetabular cups placed at the high hip center versus those placed at the anatomic hip center, over any time frame. The review protocol was registered with PROSPERO (registration number CRD42020168183) before commencement. Of 238 records, eight comparative, retrospective nonrandomized studies of interventions were eligible for our systematic review, reporting on 207 hips with cups placed at the high hip center and 268 hips with cups at the anatomic hip center. Risk of bias within eligible studies was assessed using the Risk Of Bias In Non-randomized Studies of Interventions tool. Due to low comparability between studies, data could not be pooled, so these studies were assessed without summary effects. Results Six studies compared Harris hip scores, two of which favored high hip center cup placement and three of which favored anatomic hip center cup placement, although none of the differences between cohorts met the minimum clinically important difference. Five studies reliably compared revision incidence, which ranged from 2% to 9% for high hip center at 7 to 15 years and 0% to 5.9% for anatomic hip center at 6 to 16 years. Five studies reported intra- and postoperative complications, with the high hip center being associated with higher incidence of dislocation and lower incidence of neurological complications. No clear difference was observed in intraoperative complications between the high hip center and anatomic hip center. Conclusion No obvious differences could be observed in Harris hip score or revision incidence after THA for osteoarthritis secondary to DDH between cups placed at the anatomic hip center and those placed at the high hip center. Placement of the acetabular cup in the high hip center may lead to higher risk of dislocation but lower risk of neurologic complications, although no difference in intraoperative complications was observed. Surgeons should be able to achieve satisfactory functional scores and revision incidence using either technique, although they should be aware of how their choice influences hip biomechanics and the need for adjunct procedures and associated risks and operative time. These recommendations should be considered with respect to the several limitations in the studies reviewed, including the presence of serious confounding factors and selection biases, inconsistent definitions of the high hip center, variations in dysplasia severity, small sample sizes, and follow-up periods. These weaknesses should be addressed in well-designed future studies. Level of Evidence Level III, therapeutic study.

No abstract

Purpose Recent studies demonstrated promising results of mosaicplasty for femoral head osteochondral lesions using posterior and lateral approaches. This study aimed to evaluate outcomes of mosaicplasty using ipsilateral femoral head autografts by minimally invasive anterior approach. The hypothesis was that this surgical technique would grant satisfactory clinical outcomes with considerable improvement of clinical scores. Methods A consecutive series of 27 mosaicplasties, to treat osteochondral lesions of the femoral head measuring 1.6 ± 0.7 cm 2 (range 0.8-4.0) in patients aged 28.7 ± 7.4 years (range 19-44), was evaluated using the mHHS and WOMAC scores at minimum follow-up of 12 months. All patients were operated by minimally invasive anterior (Hueter) approach and osteochondral plugs were harvested from the non-weight-bearing portion of the femoral head. Adjuvant osteoplasty was necessary for some patients at the acetabulum (n = 3), femur (n = 14) or both (n = 2). Results Three patients were excluded due to concomitant periacetabular osteotomies or shelf procedures, one patient could not be reached, and another was revised to THA. This left 22 patients for clinical assessment at 39.4 ± 23.2 months (12.0-90.2). Their mHHS improved from 56.3 ± 12.6 to 88.4 ± 9.9, and WOMAC improved from 45.1 ± 16.9 to 80.6 ± 13.0. Two patients (8.4%) underwent arthroscopy at 13 and 30 months to remove painful residual cam-type deformities. Regression analyses revealed that net improvement in WOMAC decreased with lesion size (p = 0.002) and increased with follow-up (p = 0.004). Conclusions Hip mosaicplasty using autografts from the ipsilateral femoral head, performed by minimally invasive anterior approach, granted satisfactory outcomes and functional improvements. Caution is, however, advised for lesions > 2 cm 2 (diameter > 16 mm) which may be a threshold limit for this procedure. Level of evidence Level IV, Case series.

No abstract

Background: Total hip arthroplasty (THA) is being increasingly performed via the Hueter anterior approach (HAA), which has proven benefits with nondysplastic hips; however, little has been published on its outcomes with dysplastic hips, where it can provide better acetabular exposure. We describe our technique for THA via the HAA in hips with Crowe type-IV developmental dysplasia and report the mid-term outcomes of cases that were performed over 5 consecutive years. Methods: We retrospectively evaluated a continuous series of 8 hips (6 patients) with Crowe type-IV dysplasia; the patient ages ranged from 44 ± 20 years (range, 17 to 65 years) at the index THA. All of the patients received uncemented implants via the HAA on a traction table to restore the hip center of rotation to the true acetabulum. Femoral head autografts (FHAs) were used to increase acetabular coverage in 6 hips, and subtrochanteric shortening osteotomies (SSOs) were performed in 5 hips. Patients were assessed clinically and radiographically at a minimum follow-up of 2 years. Results: There were no revisions, deaths, dislocations, or infections. Two hips (25%) had intraoperative complications, and 1 hip (13%) had a postoperative complication that required reoperation without implant removal. All of the hips were assessed clinically and radiographically at 4 ± 1 years (range, 2 to 6 years). The modified Harris hip score (mHHS) improved from 33 ± 7 to 90 ± 7, and the Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC) improved from 53 ± 14 to 89 ± 6; the postoperative leg-length discrepancy was 3.2 mm (range, −10 to 20 mm). None of the hips had osteolysis or radiolucent lines of >2 mm. Conclusions: THA via the HAA on a traction table for hips with Crowe type-IV dysplasia yielded satisfactory mid-term outcomes. Both FHA and SSO can be adequately performed via the HAA to help restore the hip center of rotation to the true acetabulum. Level of Evidence: Therapeutic Level IV. See Instructions for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.

Purpose This study aims to determine whether changing the stem coating grants superior outcomes at a minimum followup of five years. Methods Retrospective review of a consecutive series of primary total hip arthroplasties (THAs) operated by direct anterior approach between 01/01/2013 and 31/12/2014. Two stems were compared, which were identical except for their surface coating; "the Original stem" was fully coated with hydroxyapatite (HA), while "the ProxCoat stem" was proximally coated with plasma-sprayed titanium and HA. Matching was performed. Clinical assessment included modified Harris hip score (mHHS), Oxford hip score (OHS), and forgotten joint score (FJS). Radiographic assessment evaluated alignment, subsidence, pedestal formation, heterotopic ossification, radiolucent lines ≥ 2 mm, spot welds, cortical hypertrophy, and osteolysis. Results 232 hips received the Original stem and 167 the ProxCoat stem, from which respectively five hips (2.2%) and no hips (0%) underwent revision. Matching identified two groups of 91 patients, with comparable patient demographics. At > five years follow-up, there were no differences in OHS (16 ± 6 vs 15 ± 5; p = 0.075) nor FJS (81 ± 26 vs 84 ± 22; p = 0.521), but there were differences in mHHS (89 ± 15 vs 92 ± 12; p = 0.042). There were no differences in alignment, subsidence, pedestal formation, heterotopic ossification, cortical hypertrophy, and osteolysis. There were differences in prevalence of proximal radiolucent lines (12% vs 0%; p < 0.001) and distal spot welds (24% vs 54%; p < 0.001). Conclusion At a minimum follow-up of five years, this study on matched patients undergoing primary THA found that ProxCoat stems results in significantly fewer radiolucent lines, more spot welds, and less revisions than Original stems, thus suggesting better bone ingrowth.

Brazil lacks registries on the prevalence of primary total hip arthroplasty (THA) fixation methods. Objective: (i) to describe the demographic profile of patients who underwent THA in the public health system of the municipality of São Paulo during the last 12 years and (ii) to compare fixation methods regarding costs, hospital stay length, and death rates. Methods: This is an ecological study conducted with data available on TabNet, a platform belonging to DATASUS. Public data (from the government health system) on THA procedures performed in São Paulo from 2008 to 2019 were extracted. Gender, age, city region, THA fixation method, number of surgeries, costs, hospital stay length, and death rates were analyzed. Results: We analyzed 7,673 THA, of which 6220 (81%) were performed via cementless/hybrid fixation and 1453 (19%), via the cemented technique. Cementless/hybrid fixation had a higher cost (US$ 495.27) than the cemented one (p < 0.001). Nevertheless, hospital stay length was 0.87 days longer for cemented fixation than the cementless/hybrid one. We found no significant difference in death rates between THA fixation methods. Conclusion: THA cementless/hybrid fixation is prevalent in the municipality of São Paulo, which had higher total costs and shorter hospitalizations than cemented fixation. We found no difference between THA fixation methods and death rates. Level of Evidence IV, Case Series.

No abstract