In recent times private creditors have increasingly begun to resort to litigation against States in case of sovereign debt default. One of the most complex recent cases concerns the legal proceedings brought against Argentina by NML Capital Limited before the courts of the United States (US). The plaintiffs are primarily “vulture funds”, seeking profit by buying heavily discounted distressed debt, that have rejected the restructuring terms accepted by the majority of Argentina’s creditors. There are two main questions at the heart of the present dispute: sovereign immunity and the alleged breach of the US Foreign Sovereign Immunities Act (FSIA), and the interpretation of the pari passu clause. The US Supreme Court held that the FSIA does not limit the scope of discovery against foreign sovereign assets and rejected Argentina’s petition for certiorari to review the Second Circuit decision upholding the injunction orders that required Argentina to pay NML Capital and the other plaintiffs whenever it pays the holders of its restructured debt. This comment assesses the approach of the US courts in relation to discovery and their interpretation of the pari passu provision. In particular, it argues that the outcome of this legal battle threatens future sovereign debt restructurings and confirms the gravity of the lack of a binding central restructuring mechanism.
The relationship between market needs and values of other nature, generally defined as non-trade/economic values/concerns, has become a central theme in the debate on economic globalization from the moment the need for 'sustainable' globalization became ever more evident, turning not only to economic growth but also to the protection of interests not strictly economic,1 such as, for example, human rights, the environment, the preservation of cultural identities. This theme is connected, of course, to a different notion of development, stemming in particular from the gradual integration of this concept with the protection of human rights,2 which resulted precisely in the emergence of a 'rights-based approach to development' and the related right to develop. This broad concept of development, which is particularly obvious in the Declaration on the Right to Development adopted by the General Assembly (GA) of the United Nations (UN) in 1986,3 is by now generally accepted. The reconciliation between apparently conflicting needs and interests, even though all deserving of equal protection, is one of the most delicate aspects of global economic governance. In such a scenario it is necessary, therefore, to
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.