No abstract

PURPOSE To analyze the frequency and associations with prognostic markers and outcome of mutations in IDH genes encoding isocitrate dehydrogenases in adult de novo cytogenetically normal acute myeloid leukemia (CN-AML). PATIENTS AND METHODS Diagnostic bone marrow or blood samples from 358 patients were analyzed for IDH1 and IDH2 mutations by DNA polymerase chain reaction amplification/sequencing. FLT3, NPM1, CEBPA, WT1, and MLL mutational analyses and gene- and microRNA-expression profiling were performed centrally. Results IDH mutations were found in 33% of the patients. IDH1 mutations were detected in 49 patients (14%; 47 with R132). IDH2 mutations, previously unreported in AML, were detected in 69 patients (19%; 13 with R172 and 56 with R140). R172 IDH2 mutations were mutually exclusive with all other prognostic mutations analyzed. Younger age (< 60 years), molecular low-risk (NPM1-mutated/FLT3-internal tandem duplication-negative) IDH1-mutated patients had shorter disease-free survival than molecular low-risk IDH1/IDH2-wild-type (wt) patients (P = .046). R172 IDH2-mutated patients had lower complete remission rates than IDH1/IDH2wt patients (P = .007). Distinctive microarray gene- and microRNA-expression profiles accurately predicted R172 IDH2 mutations. The highest expressed gene and microRNAs in R172 IDH2-mutated patients compared with the IDH1/IDH2wt patients were APP (previously associated with complex karyotype AML) and miR-1 and miR-133 (involved in embryonal stem-cell differentiation), respectively. CONCLUSION IDH1 and IDH2 mutations are recurrent in CN-AML and have an unfavorable impact on outcome. The R172 IDH2 mutations, previously unreported in AML, characterize a novel subset of CN-AML patients lacking other prognostic mutations and associate with unique gene- and microRNA-expression profiles that may lead to the discovery of novel, therapeutically targetable leukemogenic mechanisms.

Background Fms-like tyrosine kinase 3-internal tandem duplication (FLT3-ITD) mutations are common in acute myeloid leukemia (AML) and are associated with rapid relapse and short survival. In relapsed/refractory (R/R) AML, the clinical benefit of FLT3 inhibitors has been limited by rapid generation of resistance mutations, especially FLT3-D835. Gilteritinib is a potent, highly selective oral FLT3/AXL inhibitor with preclinical activity against FLT3-ITD and FLT3-D835 mutations. The aim of this Phase 1/2 study was to assess the safety, tolerability, and pharmacokinetic (PK) effects of gilteritinib in FLT3 mutation-positive (FLT3mut+) R/R AML. Methods This ongoing pharmacodynamic-driven Phase 1/2 trial (NCT02014558) enrolled subjects from October 2013 to August 2015 who were aged ≥18 years and were either refractory to induction therapy or had relapsed after achieving remission with prior therapy. Subjects were enrolled in one of seven dose-escalation or dose-expansion cohorts that were assigned to receive once-daily doses of oral gilteritinib (20, 40, 80, 120, 200, 300, or 450 mg). Cohort expansion was based on safety/tolerability, FLT3 inhibition in correlative assays, and antileukemic activity; the 120 and 200 mg dose cohorts were further expanded to include FLT3mut+ patients only. Safety and tolerability, and PK effects were the primary endpoints; antileukemic response was the main secondary endpoint. Safety and tolerability were assessed by monitoring dose-limiting toxicities and treatment-emergent adverse events, and safety assessments (eg, clinical laboratory evaluations, electrocardiograms) in the Safety Analysis Set. Findings A total of 252 adults with R/R AML, including 58 with wild-type FLT3 and 194 with FLT3 mutations (FLT3-ITD, n=162; FLT3-D835, n=16; FLT3-ITD and -D835, n=13; other, n=3), received oral gilteritinib (20–450 mg) once daily in one of seven dose-escalation (n=23) or dose-expansion (n=229) cohorts. Gilteritinib was well tolerated in this heavily pretreated population; Grade 3 diarrhea and hepatic transaminase elevation limited dosing above 300 mg/d. The most common Grade 3/4 adverse events were febrile neutropenia (39%; n=97/252), anemia (24%; n=61/252), thromobocytopenia (13%; n=33/252), sepsis (11%; n=28/252), and pneumonia (11%; n=27/252). Serious adverse events in ≥5% of patients were febrile neutropenia (31%; n=78/252), progressive disease (17%; n=43/252), sepsis (14%; n=36/252), pneumonia (11%; n=27/252), and acute renal failure (10%; n=25/252), pyrexia (8%; n=21/252), bacteremia (6%; n=14/252), and respiratory failure (6%; n=14/252). Gilteritinib demonstrated consistent, potent inhibition of FLT3 phosphorylation at doses ≥80 mg/d in correlative assays. While responses were observed across all dose levels regardless of FLT3 mutation status (overall response rate [ORR]=40%), response rate was improved in FLT3mut+ patients at doses ≥80 mg/d (ORR=52%). Among patients with FLT3-ITD, the additional presence of FLT3-D835 did not alter response rate; patients with only FLT3-D835 respond...

In a randomized trial of therapy for FMS-like tyrosine kinase-3 (FLT3) mutant acute myeloid leukemia in first relapse, 224 patients received chemotherapy alone or followed by 80 mg of the FLT3 inhibitor lestaurtinib twice daily. Endpoints included complete remission or complete remission with incomplete platelet recovery (CR/CRp), overall survival, safety, and tolerability. Correlative studies included pharmacokinetics and analysis of in vivo FLT3 inhibition. There were 29 patients with CR/CRp in the lestaurtinib arm and 23 in the control arm (26% vs 21%; P = .35), and no difference in overall survival between the 2 arms. There was evidence of toxicity in the lestaurtinib-treated patients, particularly those with plasma levels in excess of 20 μM. In the lestaurtinib arm, FLT3 inhibition was highly correlated with remission rate, but target inhibition on day 15 was achieved in only 58% of patients receiving lestaurtinib. Given that such a small proportion of patients on this trial achieved sustained FLT3 inhibition in vivo, any conclusions regarding the efficacy of combining FLT3 inhibition with chemotherapy are limited. Overall, lestaurtinib treatment after chemotherapy did not increase response rates or prolong survival of patients with FLT3 mutant acute myeloid leukemia in first relapse. This study is registered at www.clinicaltrials.gov as #NCT00079482.

The ELN classification clearly separates the genetic groups by outcome, supporting its use for risk stratification in clinical trials. Because they have different proportions of genetic alterations and outcomes, younger and older patients should be reported separately when using the ELN classification.

No abstract

Since cloning of the ATP-binding cassette (ABC) family member breast cancer resistance protein (BCRP/ABCG2) and its characterization as a multidrug resistance efflux transporter in 1998, BCRP has been the subject of more than two thousand scholarly articles. In normal tissues, BCRP functions as a defense mechanism against toxins and xenobiotics, with expression in the gut, bile canaliculi, placenta, blood-testis and blood-brain barriers facilitating excretion and limiting absorption of potentially toxic substrate molecules, including many cancer chemotherapeutic drugs. BCRP also plays a key role in heme and folate homeostasis, which may help normal cells survive under conditions of hypoxia. BCRP expression appears to be a characteristic of certain normal tissue stem cells termed “side population cells,” which are identified on flow cytometric analysis by their ability to exclude Hoechst 33342, a BCRP substrate fluorescent dye. Hence, BCRP expression may contribute to the natural resistance and longevity of these normal stem cells. Malignant tissues can exploit the properties of BCRP to survive hypoxia and to evade exposure to chemotherapeutic drugs. Evidence is mounting that many cancers display subpopulations of stem cells that are responsible for tumor self-renewal. Such stem cells frequently manifest the “side population” phenotype characterized by expression of BCRP and other ABC transporters. Along with other factors, these transporters may contribute to the inherent resistance of these neoplasms and their failure to be cured.

IntroductionSignal transducer and activator of transcription (STAT) proteins are a family of latent cytoplasmic transcription factors involved in cytokine, hormone, and growth factor signal transduction. 1-7 STAT proteins mediate broadly diverse biologic processes, including cell growth, differentiation, apoptosis, fetal development, transformation, inflammation, and immune response. The intent of this review is to provide a brief synopsis of the role of STAT activation in signal transduction, the structure of STAT proteins, mechanisms of aberrant signal transduction, and the role of STAT proteins in normal and malignant hematopoiesis. The review focuses in particular on the role of STAT activation in leukemogenesis. STATs in signal transductionThe interaction of a cytokine with its ligand-binding receptor ␣ subunit is the first step in the formation of a signaling-competent receptor complex. This process involves the oligomerization of the ligand-bound subunit with either another subunit or a separate, signal-transducing ␤ subunit. 8,9 This oligomerization initiates the process of signal transduction by activation of the receptorassociated Janus family tyrosine kinases (JAKs) through crossphosphorylation ( Figure 1). Immediate targets of the activated JAKs are the cytoplasmic portions of the receptors and receptorassociated proteins. The tyrosine phosphorylated sites become docking elements for Src homology 2 (SH2)-and phosphotyrosylbinding domain-containing proteins present in the membrane or the cytoplasmic compartment. Prominent among these are the STATs. Receptor-recruited STATs are phosphorylated on a single tyrosine residue in the carboxy terminal portion. The modified STATs are released from the cytoplasmic region of the receptor subunits to form homodimers or heterodimers through reciprocal interaction between the phosphotyrosine of one STAT and the SH2 domain of another. Following dimerization, STATs rapidly translocate to the nucleus and interact with specific regulatory elements to induce target gene transcription. STAT family members and chromosomal localizationSTAT proteins were originally discovered in interferon (IFN)-regulated gene transcription in the early 1990s. [10][11][12] Since then, a number of cytokines have been recognized to activate various STAT proteins (Table 1). Seven members of the STAT family of transcription factors have been identified in mammalian cells: STAT1, STAT2, STAT3, STAT4, STAT5a, STAT5b, and STAT6.Convincing evidence from genetic mapping studies indicates a common ancestral origin that gave rise to 3 chromosomal clusters of STAT genes through a series of duplication processes (Table 2). 37 Structure of STATsPrevious characterization of the crystal structure of STAT molecules allowed a better understanding of the distinct functional domains within the STAT proteins. 38,39 Several domains are conserved in all STAT family members ( Figure 2; Table 3). STAT isoformsSTAT isoforms lacking regions of the c-terminal domain have a competitive dominant-negative (DN) effect on...