This study aimed to establish normative and reliability data for the Eating Disorder Examination-Questionnaire (EDE-Q) in a sample of high school and university men. A total of 250 men aged 15 to 30 years (mean = 19.7; SD = 2.3) with an average BMI of 23.1 (SD = 3.1) were administered the EDE-Q. Mean global EDE-Q was 0.44 (SD = 0.52), with subscale means ranging from 0.15 (SD = 0.38) for eating concern to 0.70 (SD = 0.81) for shape concern. EDE-Q scores among this non-clinical sample of normal-weight young men were significantly, and almost invariably, lower than similarly aged young women. The EDE-Q performed less reliably among men than women, and this is an important caveat. Owing to the overall pattern of low item endorsement, reliance upon this single instrument is unlikely to provide a comprehensive assessment of shape, weight, and eating concerns among normal-weight young men in the community.

Our study provides psychometric support for the Norwegian version of the BSQ-14 among a clinical and non-clinical sample of both young men and women.

The objective of this study was to compare body size estimation based on memory versus perception, in patients with anorexia nervosa (AN) and healthy controls, adjusting for possible confounders. Seventy-one women (AN: 37, controls: 35), aged 14-29 years, were assessed with a computerized body size estimation morphing program. Information was gathered on depression, anxiety, time since last meal, weight and height. Results showed that patients overestimated their body size significantly more than controls, both in the memory and perception condition. Further, patients overestimated their body size significantly more when estimation was based on perception than memory. When controlling for anxiety, the difference between patients and controls no longer reached significance. None of the other confounders contributed significantly to the model. The results suggest that anxiety plays a role in overestimation of body size in AN. This finding might inform treatment, suggesting that more focus should be aimed at the underlying anxiety.

The Child Eating Disorder Examination (ChEDE) is a valid and reliable semi-structured interview, which measures eating-disorder specific psychopathology in children and young adolescents. The instrument is an adaptation of version 12.0D of the original Eating Disorder Examination (EDE 12.0) for adults. The Norwegian translation of the ChEDE is currently the only instrument for assessing eating disorder psychopathology in Norwegian children and adolescents. This study aimed to investigate the psychometric properties of the Norwegian translation of the ChEDE 12.0. The Norwegian version of ChEDE 12.0 was administered to 15 Norwegian children with anorexia nervosa (AN), 15 children with diabetes mellitus type 1 (DM) and two groups of 15 age-matched controls. The groups were compared using a matched pairs design. The results showed that the subscale scores of the AN group were significantly higher than those of the other groups, and the DM comparison group did not differ from its control group. The current AN group scored significantly higher on the Shape Concern subscale than the previous UK sample, with implications for construct validity or cross-cultural effects worthy of further study. Inter-rater reliability was generally high (r=0.91 to 1.00), although there were significant differences between raters on specific items for individual participants. Alpha coefficients for each of the ChEDE subscales indicated a high degree of internal consistency. It was concluded that the Norwegian version of the ChEDE 12 has adequate psychometric properties and can be recommended for clinical and research use with young people with eating disorders in Norway.

The results suggest that there is no association between these areas of neuropsychological difficulties and body size estimation among patients with AN. Copyright © 2017 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd and Eating Disorders Association.