The effect of single and multiple 1-methyl-1,2,3,4-tetrahydroisoquinoline (1MeTIQ) and 1-benzyl-1,2,3,4-tetrahydroisoquinoline (1BnTIQ) administration on concentrations of dopamine and its metabolites: homovanillic acid (HVA) and 3,4-dihydroxyphenylacetic acid (DOPAC) and 3-methoxytyramine (3MT) in three brain areas was studied HPLC with electrochemical detection in Wistar rats. The rate of dopamine catabolism in the striatum along the N-oxidative and O-methylation pathways was assessed by calculation of the ratio of appropriate metabolites to dopamine concentration. In addition, the spontaneous and apomorphine-stimulated locomotor activity, and muscle rigidity was studied after acute administration of 1MeTIQ and 1BnTIQ. We have found that 1MeTIQ did not change the level of dopamine and HVA in all investigated structures both after a single and chronic administration. However, the levels of intermediary dopamine metabolites, DOPAC and 3MT, were distinctly affected. The level of DOPAC was strongly depressed (by 60±70%) while the level of extraneuronal matabolite 3MT was signi®cantly elevated (by 170±200%). In contrast to 1MeTIQ, 1BnTIQ depressed the level of dopamine (by approximately 60%) and increased the level of total metabolite, HVA, (by 40%) especially in the striatum, but the levels of DOPAC and 3MT remained unchanged. The paper has shown that 1MeTIQ and 1BnTIQ produced different effects on dopamine catabolism. Potential neuroprotective compound 1MeTIQ did not change the rate of total dopamine catabolism, it strongly inhibited the monoamine oxidase (MAO)-dependent catabolic pathway and signi®cantly activated the catechol-O-methyltransferase (COMT)-dependent O-methylation. In contrast 1BnTIQ, a compound with potential neurotoxic activity, produced the signi®cant increase of the rate of dopamine metabolism with strong activation of the oxidative MAO-dependent catabolic pathway. Interestingly, both compounds produced similar antidopaminergic functional effects: antagonism of apomorphine hyperactivity and induction of muscle rigidity. The results may explain the biochemical basis of the neuroprotective and of the neurotoxic properties endogenous brain tetrahydroisoquinoline derivatives.

Sixteen unfused heterobiaromatic and biphenyl compounds substituted with an amino side chain (protonated in water) have been tested for (i) binding with DNA and (ii) their effect on the digestion of the DNA double helix by a bleomycin-iron complex. Only the DNA intercalating molecules amplify the digestion of DNA. One 2,2'-bipyridine derivative tested is an inhibitor of the bleomycin reaction because it removes ferrous ion from the bleomycin complex. Polarity of the intercalating unfused biaromatic system is of primary importance for effective binding of the molecule with native DNA and, at the same time, for its amplification activity. The molecules that have the biaromatic system polarized extensively in the direction of the side cationic chain, so that the intercalating sites constitutes a positive part of the dipole, show strong binding with DNA and good amplification activity. For strong intercalative forces that determine the amplification activity, it is important that both the heteroaromatic subsystems of the molecule have positive ends of their dipoles positioned away from the side chain. This work provides general guidelines for synthesis of new highly effective bleomycin amplifiers.

Structural modifications of 1, a postsynaptic 5-HT(1A) receptor antagonist, provided its flexible (8, 12) and rigid (7, 9, 11, 13) analogues. Compounds 7, 8, 9, and 11 showed high 5-HT(1A) receptor affinity (K(i) = 4-72 nM). They acted as 5-HT(1A) postsynaptic receptor antagonists, since, like 1, they inhibited the behavioral syndrome, i.e., flat body posture (FBP) and forepaw treading (FT), in reserpine-pretreated rats as well as the lower lip retraction (LLR) in rats, both induced by 8-hydroxy-2-(di-n-propylamino)tetralin hydrobromide (8-OH-DPAT), a 5-HT(1A) receptor agonist. Compound 12, which demonstrated high 5-HT(1A) receptor affinity (K(i) = 50 nM), revealed properties of a partial 5-HT(1A) receptor agonist: it induced LLR and, at the same time, inhibited FT in rats. Compound 13 (K(i) = 1600 nM) was not tested in a behavioral study. Restriction of the conformational freedom in 2, a full 5-HT(1A) receptor antagonist, yielded compound 14 with high 5-HT(1A) receptor affinity (K(i) = 47 nM) and partial agonist properties at postsynaptic 5-HT(1A) receptors in the above tests in vivo; i.e., it induced LLR and inhibited FBP and FT in rats. New constrained analogues of 1 and 2 (compounds 7 and 14, respectively) were also synthesized to recognize a bioactive conformation of those 5-HT(1A) receptor antagonists. On the basis of in vitro and in vivo investigations, binding and functional properties of compound 7 were found to reflect those of 1 at 5-HT(1A) receptors. On the other hand, compound 14, a rigid analogue of 2, showed a different activity in vivo in comparison with the parent compound. PM3 and MM calculations revealed the existence of three low-energy conformers of 7 and six of 14, all of them belonging to the extended family of conformations. The optimized structures of both analogues had a different angle between aromatic planes of terminal fragments; moreover, the heteroaromatic system of those molecules occupied various space regions. Our present study provides support to the hypothesis that the bioactive conformation of 1, responsible for its postsynaptic 5-HT(1A) receptor antagonism, is an extended linear structure represented by 7.

No abstract