This is a PDF file of a peer-reviewed paper that has been accepted for publication. Although unedited, the content has been subjected to preliminary formatting. Nature is providing this early version of the typeset paper as a service to our authors and readers. The text and figures will undergo copyediting and a proof review before the paper is published in its final form. Please note that during the production process errors may be discovered which could affect the content, and all legal disclaimers apply.

No abstract

Background Access to primary care was hindered by the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic. Objective Evaluate changes in health screening rates before and during the pandemic. Design Retrospective analysis of health maintenance and disease management screening rates among primary care patients before and during the pandemic. Participants Over 150,000 patients of a large, academic health system. Main Measures Six quality measures were analyzed: colon cancer, breast cancer, cervical cancer, diabetes Hgb A1C, diabetes eye, and diabetes nephropathy monitoring . Based on US Preventative Services Task Force screening guidelines, we determined which patients were due for at least one of the quality measures. We tracked completion rates during three time periods: pre-pandemic (January 1–March 3, 2020), stay-at-home (March 4–May 8, 2020), and phased reopening (May 9–July 8, 2020). Differences in quality measure completion rates were evaluated using mixed-effects logistic regression models. Key Results Compared to pre-pandemic rates, completion of all health screenings declined during the stay-at-home period: mammograms (OR: 0.34; 95% CI: 0.31–0.37), cervical cancer (OR: 0.83; 95% CI: 0.76–0.91), colorectal cancer (OR: 0.25; 95% CI: 0.23–0.28), diabetes eye (OR: 0.34; 95% CI: 0.29–0.41), diabetes Hgb A1c (OR: 0.41; 95% CI: 0.37–0.46), and diabetes nephropathy (OR: 0.46, 95% CI: 0.41–0.53). During phased reopening, completion of all quality measures increased compared to the stay-at-home period, except for cervical cancer screening (OR: 0.83; 95% CI: 0.76–0.92). There was a persistent reduction in completion of all quality measures, except for diabetic nephropathy monitoring (OR: 0.99; 95% CI: 0.89–1.09), during phased reopening compared to pre-pandemic. Conclusions Healthcare screening rates were reduced during the early part of the COVID-19 pandemic and did not fully recover to pre-pandemic rates by July 2020. Future research should aim to clarify the long-term impacts of delayed health screenings. New interventions should be considered for expanding remote preventative health services.

Background The impact of telemedicine on ambulatory care quality is a key question for policymakers as they navigate payment reform for remote care. Objective To evaluate whether utilizing telemedicine in the first 9 months of the COVID-19 pandemic impacted performance on a diabetes quality of care measure for patients at a large academic medical center. We hypothesized care quality would reduce less among telemedicine users. Design Quasi-experimental design using binomial logistic regression. Covariates included age, gender, race, ethnicity, type of insurance, hierarchical condition category score, primary language at the individual level, and zip code–level income. Participants All adult patients younger than 75 years of age diagnosed with type 2 diabetes mellitus (N = 16,588) as of 3/19/2020 at a single academic health center. Interventions Completion of one or more telemedicine encounters with an institutional primary care physician or endocrinologist between 3/19/2020 and 12/19/2020. Main Measures The components met in a five-item composite measure of diabetes quality of care, as of patients’ last clinical encounter. Items were (1) systolic blood pressure less than 140 mmHg, (2) hemoglobin A1c less than 8.0%, (3) using a statin and (4) aspirin, and (5) tobacco non-use. Key Results From the pre- to post-period, the probability of meeting any given component of the composite measure for patients only utilizing in-person care was 21% lower (OR, 95% CI 0.79; 0.76, 0.81) and for the telemedicine users 2% lower (OR 0.98; 0.85, 1.13). There was an increased likelihood of meeting any given component among telemedicine users compared to in-person care alone (OR 1.25; 1.08, 1.44). Conclusions Patients with diabetes utilizing telemedicine performed similarly on a composite measure of diabetes care quality compared to before the pandemic. Those not utilizing telemedicine had reductions. Telemedicine use maintained quality of care for patients with diabetes during the first 9 months of the COVID-19 pandemic.

Objective Survival outcomes for human papillomavirus‐associated oropharynx squamous cell carcinoma (HPV + OPSCC) treated with surgery alone are unclear. To increase understanding, we assessed overall survival (OS) outcomes using the national cancer database (NCDB). Methods We conducted a retrospective analysis of OS of 736 NCDB HPV + OPSCC patients who underwent surgery alone from 2010 to 2014 using univariate and multivariate analyses and the Kaplan‐Meir method. Results Multivariable analysis found the following independent risk factors for death: American Joint Commission on Cancer (AJCC) 8th edition pathologic stage(p)N2 versus pN0 disease (hazard ratio [HR], 5.5; P = 0.000006), macroscopic extranodal extension (ENE) versus non‐ENE (HR, 4.9; P < 0.02), a positive lymph nodes (LN) percentage of ≥10% (HR, 4.2; P = 0.0002), and five or more positive LNs (HR, 4.9; P = 0.00004). Three‐year OS was significantly worse for AJCC 8th edition pN2 versus pN0 but not for 7th edition pN2 versus pN0 disease. Five‐year OS was significantly worse for positive versus negative surgical margins, AJCC 8th edition stage II versus I, and either microscopic or macroscopic ENE versus non‐ENE positive LNs. For 523 (71%) AJCC 8th edition stage I patients and for 283 (38%) patients who were pT1–T2, with negative margins, pN0–N1, with ≤4 pathologic LNs, without ENE, and with >20 LNs removed during neck dissection, the 3‐year OS rates were 93% and 95%, respectively, and the 5‐year OS rates were 91% and 95%, respectively. Conclusion In the context of the lack of detail and possible inaccuracies found in the NCDB, surgery alone for AJCC 8th edition stage I HPV + OPSCC, particularly pT1–T2, pN0–N1 with ≤4 pathologic LNs, without ENE, and with negative surgical margins has a high OS. Level of Evidence 4 Laryngoscope, 130:E423–E435, 2020