No abstract

Rapid enhancer and slow promoter evolution have been demonstrated through comparative genomics. However, it is not clear how this information is encoded genetically and if this can be used to place evolution in a predictive context. Part of the challenge is that our understanding of the potential for regulatory evolution is biased primarily toward natural variation or limited experimental perturbations. Here, to explore the evolutionary capacity of promoter variation, we surveyed an unbiased mutation library for three promoters in Drosophila melanogaster . We found that mutations in promoters had limited to no effect on spatial patterns of gene expression. Compared to developmental enhancers, promoters are more robust to mutations and have more access to mutations that can increase gene expression, suggesting that their low activity might be a result of selection. Consistent with these observations, increasing the promoter activity at the endogenous locus of shavenbaby led to increased transcription yet limited phenotypic changes. Taken together, developmental promoters may encode robust transcriptional outputs allowing evolvability through the integration of diverse developmental enhancers. This article is part of the theme issue ‘Interdisciplinary approaches to predicting evolutionary biology’.

Rapid enhancer and slow promoter evolution have been demonstrated through comparative genomics. However, it is not clear how this information is encoded genetically and if this can be used to place evolution in a predictive context. Part of the challenge is that our understanding of the potential for regulatory evolution is biased primarily toward natural variation or limited experimental perturbations. Here, to explore the evolutionary capacity of promoter variation, we surveyed an unbiased mutation library for three promoters in Drosophila melanogaster. We found that mutations in promoters had limited to no effect on spatial patterns of gene expression. Compared to developmental enhancers, promoters are more robust to mutations and have more access to mutations that can increase gene expression, suggesting that their low activity might be a result of selection. Consistent with these observations, increasing the promoter activity at the endogenous locus of shavenbaby led to increased transcription yet limited phenotypic changes. Taken together, developmental promoters may encode robust transcriptional outputs allowing evolvability through the integration of diverse developmental enhancers.

Transcription of tRNA genes by RNA Polymerase III (RNAPIII) is tightly regulated by signaling cascades in response to nutrient availability. The emerging notion of differential tRNA gene regulation implies the existence of additional regulatory mechanisms. However, tRNA gene-specific regulatory factors have not been described. For that reason, we decoded the proteome of a single native tRNA gene locus in yeast. We observed dynamic reprogramming of the core RNAPIII transcription machinery upon nutrient perturbation. In addition, we identified Fpt1, a protein of unknown function. Fpt1 uniquely occupied tRNA genes but its occupancy varied and correlated with the efficiency of RNAPIII eviction upon nutrient perturbation. Decoding the proteome of a tRNA gene in the absence of Fpt1 revealed that Fpt1 promotes eviction of RNAPIII. Cells without Fpt1 also showed impaired shutdown of ribosome biogenesis genes upon nutrient perturbation. Our findings provide support for a chromatin-associated mechanism required for RNAPIII eviction from tRNA genes and for tuning an integrated physiological response to changing metabolic demands.

No abstract