Emicizumab prophylaxis administered subcutaneously once weekly or every 2 weeks led to a significantly lower bleeding rate than no prophylaxis among persons with hemophilia A without inhibitors; more than half the participants who received prophylaxis had no treated bleeding events. In an intraindividual comparison, emicizumab therapy led to a significantly lower bleeding rate than previous factor VIII prophylaxis. (Funded by F. Hoffmann-La Roche and Chugai Pharmaceutical; HAVEN 3 ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT02847637 .).

No abstract

In a Plenary Paper, Young et al describe impressive favorable outcomes of emicizumab prophylaxis in children with hemophilia A and factor VIII inhibitors, reporting a 99% reduction in annualized bleeding, with 77% of patients having no treated bleeding events.

Key Points• High-dose intensive factor VIII treatment increases the risk for inhibitor development in patients with severe hemophilia A.• In patients with severe hemophilia A, factor VIII prophylaxis decreases inhibitor risk, especially in patients with low-risk F8 mutations.The objective of this study was to examine the association of the intensity of treatment, ranging from high-dose intensive factor VIII (FVIII) treatment to prophylactic treatment, with the inhibitor incidence among previously untreated patients with severe hemophilia A. This cohort study aimed to include consecutive patients with a FVIII activity < 0.01 IU/mL, born between 2000 and 2010, and observed during their first 75 FVIII exposure days. Intensive FVIII treatment of hemorrhages or surgery at the start of treatment was associated with an increased inhibitor risk (adjusted hazard ratio [aHR], 2.0; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.3-3.0). High-dose FVIII treatment was associated with a higher inhibitor risk than low-dose FVIII treatment (aHR, 2.3; 95% CI, 1.0-4.8). Prophylaxis was only associated with a decreased overall inhibitor incidence after 20 exposure days of FVIII. The association with prophylaxis was more pronounced in patients with low-risk F8 genotypes than in patients with high-risk F8 genotypes (aHR, 0.61, 95% CI, 0.85, 95% CI, respectively). In conclusion, our findings suggest that in previously untreated patients with severe hemophilia A, high-dosed intensive FVIII treatment increases inhibitor risk and prophylactic FVIII treatment decreases inhibitor risk, especially in patients with low-risk F8 mutations. (Blood. 2013;121(20):4046-4055)

This case-control study investigated the interactions between genetic and environmental factors and inhibitor development in 108 children with haemophilia A exclusively treated with recombinant factor VIII (FVIII). Sixty patients with inhibitors were compared with 48 inhibitor-free controls. Family history of inhibitors and null mutations in the FVIII gene were more prevalent in cases than in controls (20% vs. 2%, P = 0.001 and 83% vs. 64%, P = 0.04, respectively). On the other hand, there was no difference between cases and controls for such putative risk factors of inhibitor development as amniocentesis/villocentesis, premature/caesarean birth, breast-feeding, treatment during infections/vaccinations, surgical procedures and central nervous system bleeding. A trend was found for an increased risk of inhibitor development in children first treated at a young age (< 11 months); however, this was not confirmed after adjusting for genetic factors. The implementation of prophylaxis was evaluated as a putative risk factor in a subgroup of 25 cases: seven who started prophylaxis prior to inhibitor development and 18 potentially eligible for prophylaxis because they were inhibitor-free up to the age of 35 months (i.e. the upper limit of the age range at prophylaxis onset in cases and the median age at prophylaxis onset in controls). Patients who started prophylaxis had a lower inhibitor risk than those treated on demand (adjusted odds ratio 0.2, 95% confidence interval 0.06-0.9). The protective effect on inhibitor development shown by prophylaxis may represent an additional advantage prompting its use in haemophilic children

To cite this article: Santagostino E, Mancuso ME, Tripodi A, Chantarangkul V, Clerici M, Garagiola I, Mannucci PM. Severe hemophilia with mild bleeding phenotype: molecular characterization and global coagulation profile. J Thromb Haemost 2010; 8: 737-43.Summary. Background: Patients with severe hemophilia may show very varied bleeding tendencies, and the reasons for this heterogeneous clinical expression are unclear. The factor VIII/ FIX genotype is the main determinant of the residual factor activity; however, different bleeding phenotypes have also been reported in patients sharing the same mutation. Such global coagulation tests as thrombin generation assays are tools with which to investigate different coagulation profiles among severe hemophiliacs. Objectives, patients and methods: This casecontrol study was aimed at comprehensively evaluating the role of genotype and endogenous thrombin potential (ETP) as predictors of the clinical phenotype in severe hemophiliacs with an extremely mild bleeding tendency (cases, n = 22), in comparison with those showing a typical bleeding tendency (controls, n = 50). Results: Cases were more frequently affected by hemophilia B than by hemophilia A, and showed a lower incidence of severe FVIII/FIX gene defects (referred to as null mutations), higher FVIII and FIX antigen levels and higher ETP values in platelet-rich plasma than controls (P < 0.05). By multivariate logistic regression, only non-null mutations were confirmed as an independent predictor of a mild clinical phenotype. Conclusions: These results indicate that nonnull mutations represent the main determinant of the bleeding tendency, and that ETP measurement in platelet-rich plasma is able to identify severe hemophiliacs with a mild clinical phenotype.

Summary.  Aim: A multicenter randomized open‐label crossover prospective trial was designed to compare the efficacy, safety, and cost of standard and high dosages of recombinant factor VIIa (rFVIIa) for home treatment of hemarthroses in hemophiliacs with inhibitors. Methods: Patients were instructed to treat, within 6 h from the onset of bleeding, four consecutive hemarthroses of ankles, knees, or elbows, either with the rFVIIa standard dose of 90 μg kg−1 (repeated as necessary every 3 h) or with a single high dose of 270 μg kg−1. Patients who did not achieve a clinical success within 9 h continued rFVIIa treatment with repeated standard doses. Response to treatment was assessed for up to 48 h by patients/caregivers, who reported on a Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) graded from 0 to 100 the improvement in symptoms and also rated the responses as effective, partially effective or ineffective. Success was defined a treatment course rated as effective and with a VAS score ≥70 and failure a treatment course rated as ineffective and VAS score ≤30, whereas treatment courses that did not fulfill these criteria were considered partial responses. Results: Twenty hemophiliacs with inhibitors were originally enrolled (median age: 27 years), 18 of them treated 32 hemarthroses assigned to the standard‐dosage and 36 to the high‐dosage regimen, during the study period of 18 months. Forty‐eight hemarthroses (71%) occurred in target joints. Success rates for standard‐ and high‐dosage regimens were similar: 31% and 25% at 9 h, 53% and 50% at 24 h, 66% and 64% at 48 h, the end point for outcome assessment. The median number of rFVIIa infusions needed to achieve a successful course was significantly greater for the standard‐dosage (n = 3) than for the high‐dosage regimen (n = 1), and the median amount of rFVIIa ultimately used per successful course was identical (270 μg kg−1). Conclusion: Our results indicate that a high‐dosage regimen with rFVIIa for home treatment of hemarthroses is effective, safe, does not imply an increased consumption of rFVIIa and requires the infusion of a smaller number of rFVIIa doses. Its convenience is particularly relevant in cases with difficult venous access and in hemorrhages into target joints.

Although a number of studies have analysed so far the causes of death and the life expectancy in haemophilic populations, no investigations have been conducted among Italian haemophilia centres. Thus, the aim of this study was to investigate mortality, causes of deaths, life expectancy and co-morbidities in Italian persons with haemophilia (PWH). Data pertaining to a total of 443 PWH who died between 1980 and 2007 were retrospectively collected in the 30 centres who are members of the Italian Association of Haemophilia Centres that chose to participate. The mortality rate ratio standardized to the male Italian population (SMR) was reduced during the periods 1990-1999 and 2000-2007 such that during the latter, death rate overlapped that of the general population (SMR 1990-1999: 1.98 95% CI 1.54-2.51; SMR 2000-2007: 1.08 95% CI 0.83-1.40). Similarly, life expectancy in the whole haemophilic population increased in the same period (71.2 years in 2000-2007 vs. 64.0 in 1990-1999), approaching that of the general male population. While human immunodeficiency virus infection was the main cause of death (45%), 13% of deaths were caused by hepatitis C-associated complications. The results of this retrospective study show that in Italian PWH improvements in the quality of treatment and global medical care provided by specialized haemophilia centres resulted in a significantly increased life expectancy.