Chronic RW consumption increases Bifidobacterium and Prevotella amounts, which may have beneficial effects by leading to lower LPS concentrations. This trial was registered at controlled-trials.com as ISRCTN88720134.

The objective was to evaluate current evidence on the prevalence and risk of oral cancer and potentially malignant oral disorders among patients with diabetes mellitus. We searched PubMed, Embase, Web of Science, and Scopus for observational studies published before November 2019. We evaluated the study quality using GRADE, QUIPS, and a specific method for systematic reviews addressing prevalence questions. Meta‐analyses were conducted, and heterogeneity and publication bias were examined. A total of 1,489 studies were found, 116 analyzed in full text, 52 included in qualitative synthesis and 49 meta‐analyzed. Pooled prevalence (PP) of oral cancer in patients with diabetic was 0.25% (95% CI = 0.15–0.39)—250 per 100,000 patients with diabetes mellitus —with a greater chance of oral cancer among patients with diabetes mellitus (OR = 1.41 [95% CI = 1.10–1.81], p = .007). Patients with oral cancer and diabetes mellitus had a higher mortality than controls (HR = 2.09 [95%CI = 1.36–3.22], p = .001). Leukoplakia had a PP = 2.49% (95% CI = 1.14–4.29)—2,490 per 100,000 patients with diabetes mellitus —(OR = 4.34 [95% CI = 1.14–16.55], p = .03). A PP of 2.72 (95% CI = 1.64–4.02) was obtained for oral lichen planus among patients with diabetic —2,720 per 100,000 patients with diabetes mellitus (OR = 1.87 [95% CI = 1.37–2.57], p < .001). A low PP was estimated for erythroplakia (0.02%[95%CI = 0.00–0.12]—20 per 100,000 patients with diabetes mellitus. In conclusion, patients with diabetes mellitus have a higher prevalence and greater chance of oral cancer and OPMD development in comparison with non‐diabetic patients. In addition, patients with oral cancer suffering from diabetes mellitus have a higher mortality compared to non‐diabetic patients with oral cancer.

No abstract

To evaluate the effectiveness of the different insulin therapies on obstetrics-fetal outcomes in women with pregestational diabetes mellitus. We enrolled 147 pregnant women with pre-existing type 1 or 2 diabetes mellitus. Clinical and biochemical parameters were analysed in relation to obstetric and fetal outcomes. 14.2% received treatment with Neutral Protamine Hagedorn insulin and short-acting insulin analogues; 19% with premixed human insulin; 40.1% with insulin glargine and lispro, 6.2% with detemir and aspart and 20% with continuous subcutaneous insulin infusion. All 5 types of treatment achieved a reduction of the mean HbA1c during pregnancy (p = 0.01). Pre-pregnancy care was carried out for 48% of patients. We found no statistically significant differences between the different insulin therapies and the obstetric-fetal outcomes. In conclusión, the different insulin therapies used in patients with pregestational diabetes mellitus does not seem to affect obstetric-fetal outcomes.

No abstract

No abstract

No abstract

No abstract