NT-proBNP is a reliable predictor of death risk independently of the effect of dialysis modality on fluid volume control, and the presence of other clinical and biochemical markers recognized as risk factors for all-cause and cardiovascular mortality. NT-pro-BNP is a good predictor of mortality independently of fluid volume overload and dialysis modality.

Background Icodextrin-based solutions (ICO) have clinical and theoretical advantages over glucose-based solutions (GLU) in fluid and metabolic management of diabetic peritoneal dialysis (PD) patients; however, these advantages have not yet been tested in a randomized fashion. Objective To analyze the effects of ICO on metabolic and fluid control in high and high-average transport diabetic patients on continuous ambulatory PD (CAPD). Patients and Methods A 12-month, multicenter, open-label, randomized controlled trial was conducted to compare ICO ( n = 30) versus GLU ( n = 29) in diabetic CAPD patients with high-average and high peritoneal transport characteristics. The basic daily schedule was 3 × 2 L GLU (1.5%) and either 1 × 2 L ICO (7.5%) or 1 × 2 L GLU (2.5%) for the long-dwell exchange, with substitution of 2.5% or 4.25% for 1.5% GLU being allowed when clinically necessary. Variables related to metabolic and fluid control were measured each month. Results Groups were similar at baseline in all measured variables. More than 66% of the patients using GLU, but only 9% using ICO, needed prescriptions of higher glucose concentration solutions. Ultrafiltration (UF) was higher (198 ± 101 mL/day, p < 0.05) in the ICO group than in the GLU group over time. Changes from baseline were more pronounced in the ICO group than in the GLU group for extracellular fluid volume (0.23 ± 1.38 vs –1.0 ± 1.48 L, p < 0.01) and blood pressure (systolic 1.5 ± 24.0 vs –10.4 ± 30.0 mmHg, p < 0.01; diastolic 1.5 ± 13.5 vs –6.2 ± 14.2 mmHg, p < 0.01). Compared to baseline, patients in the ICO group had better metabolic control than those in the GLU group: glucose absorption was more reduced (–17 ± 44 vs –64 ± 35 g/day) as were insulin needs (3.6 ± 3.4 vs – 9.1 ± 4.7 U/day, p < 0.01), fasting serum glucose (8.3 ± 36.5 vs –37 ± 25.8 mg/dL, p < 0.01), triglycerides (54.5 ± 31.9 vs –54.7 ± 39.9 mg/dL, p < 0.01), and glycated hemoglobin (0.79% ± 0.79% vs –0.98% ± 0.51%, p < 0.01). Patients in the ICO group had fewer adverse events related to fluid and glucose control than patients in the GLU group. Conclusion Icodextrin represents a significant advantage in the management of high transport diabetic patients on PD, improving peritoneal UF and fluid control and reducing the burden of glucose overexposure, thereby facilitating metabolic control.

Background Inflammation is an important risk for mortality in dialysis patients. Extracellular fluid volume (ECFv) expansion, a condition commonly seen in peritoneal dialysis (PD) patients, may be associated with inflammation. However, published support for this relationship is scarce. Objectives To quantify the proportion of patients on PD with inflammation and to analyze the role of ECFv expansion and the factors related to these conditions. Design A prospective, multicenter cross-sectional study in six hospitals with a PD program. Patients and Methods Adult patients on PD were studied. Clinical data, body composition, and sodium and fluid intake were recorded. Biochemical analysis, C-reactive protein (CRP), and peritoneal and urinary fluid and sodium removal were also measured. Results CRP values positive (≥ 3.0 mg/L) for inflammation were found in 147 (80.3%) and negative in 36 patients. Patients with positive CRP had higher ECFv/total body water (TBW) ratio (women 47.69 ± 0.69 vs 47.36 ± 0.65, men 43.15 ± 1.14 vs 42.84 ± 0.65; p < 0.05), higher serum glucose (125.09 ± 81.90 vs 103.28 ± 43.30 mg/dL, p < 0.03), and lower serum albumin (2.86 ± 0.54 vs 3.17 ± 0.38 g/dL, p < 0.001) levels. They also had lower ultrafiltration (1003 ± 645 vs 1323 ± 413 mL/day, p < 0.005) and total fluid removal (1260 ± 648 vs 1648 ± 496 mL/day, p < 0.001), and less peritoneal (15.59 ± 162.14 vs 78.11 ± 110.70 mEq/day, p < 0.01) and total sodium removal (42.06 ± 142.49 vs 118.60 ± 69.73 mEq/day, p < 0.001). In the multivariate analysis, only ECFv/TBW was significantly ( p < 0.04) and independently associated with inflammation. ECFv/TBW was correlated with fluid removal ( r = 0.16, p < 0.03) and renal sodium removal ( r = 0.2, p < 0.01). Conclusion The data suggest that ECFv expansion may have a significant role as an inflammatory stimulus. The results disclose a relationship between the two variables, ECFv expansion and inflammation, identified as independent risk factors for mortality in PD patients.