Fig. 2. Rapid induction of interchromosomal interactions by nuclear hormone signaling. (A) 3D-FISH confirmation of E 2 -induced (60 min) TFF1:GREB1 interchromosomal interactions in HMECs with the distribution of loci distances measured (box plot with scatter plot) and quantification of colocalization (bar graph) before and after E 2 treatment. Cells exhibiting mono-or biallelic interactions were combined for comparison with cells showing no colocalization; statistical significance in the bar graph was determined by χ 2 test (**, P < 0.001). (B) 2D FISH confirmation of the interchromosomal interactions in HMEC cells by combining chromosome paint (aqua) and specific DNA probes (green and red). (Upper) Illustrates two examples of mock-treated cells. (Lower) Shows the biallelic interactions/ nuclear reorganization after E 2 treatment for 60 min, exhibiting kissing events between chromosome 21 and chromosome 2. (C) Similar analysis on HMECs, but in this case using 3D FISH to paint chromosome 2 (red) and chromosome 21 (green), showing E 2 -induced chromosome 2-chromosome 21 interaction. Both assays revealed neither chromosome 21-chromosome 21 nor chromosome 2-chromosome 2 interactions in response to E 2. (D) Temporal kinetics of GREB1:TFF1 interactions by 3D FISH in HMECs (**, P < 0.001 by χ 2 ). (E-G) Nuclear microinjection of siRNA against ERα, CBP/p300, or SRC1/pCIP prevented E 2 -induced interchromosomal interactions, counting both mono-and biallelic interactions (**, P < 0.001 by χ 2 ). The injection of siER and siDLC1 were done in the same experiment, sharing the same control group. (H) Nuclear microinjection of siRNA against LSD1, which was shown to be required for estrogen-induced gene expression (22), did not block E 2 -induced interchromosomal interactions. The injection of siLSD1 and SRC1/pCIP were done in a single experiment, sharing the same control group.

SUMMARY The association between hyper-inflammatory states and numerous diseases is widely recognized, but our understanding of the molecular strategies that have evolved to prevent uncontrolled activation of inflammatory responses remains incomplete. Here, we report a critical, non-transcriptional role of GPS2 as a guardian against hyperstimulation of the TNFα-induced gene program. GPS2 cytoplasmic actions are required to specifically modulate RIP1 ubiquitylation and JNK activation by inhibiting TRAF2/Ubc13 enzymatic activity. In vivo relevance of GPS2 anti-inflammatory role is confirmed by inhibition of TNFα target genes in macrophages and by improved insulin signaling in the adipose tissue of aP2-GPS2 transgenic mice. As the non-transcriptional role is complemented by GPS2 functioning as positive and negative cofactor for nuclear receptors, in vivo overexpression also results in elevated circulating level of Resistin and development of hepatic steatosis. Together, these studies define GPS2 as a molecular guardian required for precise control of inflammatory responses involved in immunity and homeostasis.

As most of the mitochondrial proteome is encoded in the nucleus, mitochondrial functions critically depend on nuclear gene expression and bidirectional mito-nuclear communication. However, mitochondria-to-nucleus communication pathways in mammals are incompletely understood. Here, we identify G-Protein Pathway Suppressor 2 (GPS2) as a mediator of mitochondrial retrograde signaling and a transcriptional activator of nuclear-encoded mitochondrial genes. GPS2-regulated translocation from mitochondria to nucleus is essential for the transcriptional activation of a nuclear stress response to mitochondrial depolarization and for supporting basal mitochondrial biogenesis in differentiating adipocytes and brown adipose tissue (BAT) from mice. In the nucleus, GPS2 recruitment to target gene promoters regulates histone H3K9 demethylation and RNA POL2 activation through inhibition of Ubc13-mediated ubiquitination. These findings, together, reveal an additional layer of regulation of mitochondrial gene transcription, uncover a direct mitochondria-nuclear communication pathway, and indicate that GPS2 retrograde signaling is a key component of the mitochondrial stress response in mammals.