BackgroundThe role of wildlife as a brucellosis reservoir for humans and domestic livestock remains to be properly established. The aim of this work was to determine the aetiology, apparent prevalence, spatial distribution and risk factors for brucellosis transmission in several Iberian wild ungulates.MethodsA multi-species indirect immunosorbent assay (iELISA) using Brucella S-LPS antigen was developed. In several regions having brucellosis in livestock, individual serum samples were taken between 1999 and 2009 from 2,579 wild bovids, 6,448 wild cervids and4,454 Eurasian wild boar (Sus scrofa), and tested to assess brucellosis apparent prevalence. Strains isolated from wild boar were characterized to identify the presence of markers shared with the strains isolated from domestic pigs.ResultsMean apparent prevalence below 0.5% was identified in chamois (Rupicapra pyrenaica), Iberian wild goat (Capra pyrenaica), and red deer (Cervus elaphus). Roe deer (Capreolus capreolus), fallow deer (Dama dama), mouflon (Ovis aries) and Barbary sheep (Ammotragus lervia) tested were seronegative. Only one red deer and one Iberian wild goat resulted positive in culture, isolating B. abortus biovar 1 and B. melitensis biovar 1, respectively. Apparent prevalence in wild boar ranged from 25% to 46% in the different regions studied, with the highest figures detected in South-Central Spain. The probability of wild boar being positive in the iELISA was also affected by age, age-by-sex interaction, sampling month, and the density of outdoor domestic pigs. A total of 104 bacterial isolates were obtained from wild boar, being all identified as B. suis biovar 2. DNA polymorphisms were similar to those found in domestic pigs.ConclusionsIn conclusion, brucellosis in wild boar is widespread in the Iberian Peninsula, thus representing an important threat for domestic pigs. By contrast, wild ruminants were not identified as a significant brucellosis reservoir for livestock.
During investigations into recent population decreases in Pyrenean chamois (Rupicapra pyrenaica pyrenaica) 21 animals found dead or dying were necropsied. Immunohistochemistry revealed the presence of a pestivirus in organs from two of the 21 chamois. From one of these animals a pestivirus was isolated from the spleen, skin and serum. The virus had better growth in ovine than in bovine cells and was neutralized most effectively by an anti-border disease virus (BDV) reference antiserum. Using panpestivirus and genotype-specific primers selected from 59-untranslated region (UTR) of the pestivirus genome, BDV RNA was demonstrated by RT-PCR. Comparison of the chamois sequences from 59-UTR, entire N pro and E2 gene coding regions with those of other pestivirus genotypes revealed that this virus did not fall into any of the pestivirus genotypes identified so far. Results of phylogenetic analysis suggested that the chamois pestivirus was closely related to BDV and it was typed as BDV-4 genotype.Pestiviruses (family Flaviviridae) affect ruminants and suids. There are four accepted pestivirus species: Border disease virus (BDV), Bovine viral diarrhoea virus-1 (BVDV-1), BVDV-2 and Classical swine fever virus (CSFV); and an isolate tentatively classified as a pestivirus from a giraffe (Heinz et al., 2000). Genetic and antigenic characterization of new pestiviruses isolated from sheep has led to the proposal that BDV strains can be allocated into one of three genotypes, BDV-1 to -3 (Becher et al., 2003).The knowledge of pestivirus infections in wild animals is limited. Pestiviruses have been isolated from giraffe (Plowright, 1969), deer, buffalo, bison, bongo, alpaca and reindeer. The deer, buffalo, alpaca and bongo isolates had BVDV-1 genotypes. The bison and reindeer isolates were closer to BD virus (Becher et al., 1997(Becher et al., , 1999) and the reindeer isolate was classified into the BDV-2 genotype (Becher et al., 2003). Serological surveys have shown that many species of free-living ruminants have varying prevalence of antibody to pestiviruses (Nettleton, 1990).The Pyrenean chamois (Rupicapra pyrenaica pyrenaica) known locally as sarrio and isard, is a free-living ruminant grazing with domesticated cattle and sheep in the Pyrenean mountains, with a population of about 25 000 animals (Pérez et al., 2002). Recently, a population decrease has been observed in both the French and Spanish Central Pyrenees, and the possible involvement of pestiviruses has been reported (Guffond et Icre, 2003;Marco et al., 2003;Schelcher & Alzieu, 2003). The study reported here was undertaken in the Principality of Andorra and four hunting reserves in Aragon (Spain): Benasque, Los Circos, Viñamala and Los Valles. The area in which chamois deaths were excessive lies between Andorra to the east and Benasque reserve to the west.A serological survey was conducted to investigate the prevalence of pestivirus antibody in Pyrenean chamois. An ELISA was used to detect anti-pestivirus antibodies in 200 sera using a standard method employing the O...
8Viral diseases can influence the population dynamics of wild carnivores and can have 9 effects on carnivore conservation. Hence, a serologic survey was conducted in an 10 opportunistic sample of 137 foxes (Vulpes vulpes) and 37 wolves (Canis lupus) in Spain 11 for 1997-2007 to detect antibodies against canine distemper virus (CDV) and against 12 canine parvovirus (CPV) by indirect ELISA. Antibodies against CDV were detected in 13 18.7% of the analyzed animals and antibodies against CPV in 17.2%. There was no 14 difference in antibody prevalence to CDV between both species, even in the same 15 region (P>0.05), but there was a significant difference in antibody prevalence to CPV 16 between foxes (5.1%) and wolves (62.2%) (P<0.05). In fox populations there was a 17 significant difference in antibody prevalence to CDV between geographic areas (Aragón 18 26.4%, La Mancha 7.8%, P<0.05). In wolf populations there was a significantly higher 19 antibody prevalence against CPV (P<0.05) in Castilla y León (100%) than in the 20 Cantabric region (53.3%). There was no significant sex or age related difference in the 21 antibody prevalence against CDV or CPV in foxes. These results indicate that contact 22 with CDV is widespread among wild canid populations in Spain and that CPV is 23 endemic in the Iberian wolf population. The implications of these results are briefly 24 discussed. 25
Between 2006 and 2008, an outbreak of Infectious Keratoconjunctivitis (IKC) affected Pyrenean chamois Rupicapra p. pyrenaica, an endemic subspecies of mountain ungulate that lives in the Pyrenees. The study focused on 14 mountain massifs (180,000 ha) where the species’ population is stable. Cases of IKC were detected in ten of the massifs and, in five of them, mortality was substantial. The outbreak spread quickly from the first location detected, with two peaks in mortality that affected one (2007) and three (2008) massifs. In the latter, the peak was seasonal (spring to autumn) and, in the former, the outbreak persisted through winter. To identify the outbreak’s aetiology, we examined 105 Pyrenean chamois clinically affected with IKC. TaqMan rt-PCR identified Mycoplasma conjunctivae in 93 (88.5%) of the chamois. Another rt-PCR detected Chlamydophila spp. in 14 of chamois, and 12 of those had mixed infections with mycoplasmas. In the period 2000–2007, the chamois population increased slightly (λ 1.026) but decreased significantly during the IKC outbreak (λ 0.8, 2007–2008; λ 0.85, 2008–2009) before increasing significantly after the outbreak (λ 1.1, 2009–2010). Sex-biased mortality shifted the adult sex ratio toward males (from 0.6 to 0.7 males per female) and reduced productivity slightly. Hunting was practically banned in the massifs where chamois experienced significant mortality and allowed again after the outbreak ended. Long-term monitoring of wild populations provides a basis for understanding the impacts of disease outbreaks and improves management decisions, particularly when species are subject to extractive exploitation.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.
hi@scite.ai
10624 S. Eastern Ave., Ste. A-614
Henderson, NV 89052, USA
Copyright © 2024 scite LLC. All rights reserved.
Made with 💙 for researchers
Part of the Research Solutions Family.