Immunoglobulin A nephropathy (IgAN) is the most common primary glomerulonephritis; the reported recurrence rate of IgAN after renal transplantation is as high as 13%-50%. The impact of immunosuppressive therapy and steroid withdrawal on the risk of recurrence of IgAN is still under debate. We performed a retrospective single-center study, selecting 123 kidney transplants (rtx) in 120 patients, between January 1995 and December 2012, with IgAN on the native kidney. In 51 of 123 transplants, at least one post-transplantation biopsy for clinical indication was performed; in 28 of 51 transplants, IgAN recurrence (IgANr) was demonstrated. This group (G1; N = 28) was compared with a group without IgANr (G2; N = 23). In our study, clinically evident IgANr rate was 54.9% (28/51) on biopsied patients. At discharge, the use of the immunosuppressant drugs (tacrolimus, cyclosporine A, mycophenolate mofetil, azathioprine, mTor inhibitors) was not associated with an increased risk of IgANr (P = NS). At discharge, all patients were steroid treated. Neither the use of tacrolimus, mycophenolate mofetil, nor mTor inhibitors (mTori) at biopsy time were associated with IgANr. However, IgANr was significantly higher in patients who experienced steroid withdrawal at any post-transplantation time (OR 7.7 P = .03). The median time to recurrence after steroid withdrawal was 59 months (min 4.18, max 113.2).

No abstract

In the absence of therapeutic guidelines for de novo or recurrent IgAN after kidney transplantation, our study reports that therapy with pulse and oral steroids for 6 months is associated with an improved renal function. Nevertheless, further randomized controlled studies in larger patient cohorts are necessary to establish the gold standard treatment.

Kidney transplanted patients are a unique population with intrinsic susceptibility to viral and bacterial infections, mainly (but not exclusively) due to continuous immunosuppression. In this setting, infectious episodes remain among the most important causes of death, with different risks according to the degree of immunosuppression, time after transplantation, type of infection, and patient conditions. Prevention, early diagnosis, and appropriate therapy are the goals of infective management, taking into account that some specific characteristics of transplanted patients may cause a delay (the absence of fever or inflammatory symptoms, the negativity of serological tests commonly adopted for the general population, or the atypical anatomical presentation depending on the surgical site and graft implantation). This review considers the recent available findings of the most common viral and bacterial infection in kidney transplanted patients and explores risk factors and outcomes in septic evolution.

No abstract