ObjectiveTo determine profiles of urban runners based on socio-demographic, health, motivational, training characteristics and running-related beliefs and behaviours.MethodsMixed, exploratory, sequential study with two stages: 1) quantitative, using an online survey; and 2) qualitative, using semi-structured interviews with runners from the previous stage. Participants were recruited via: running routes commonly attended by runners, eight races, previous databases and social media networks. The survey collected information on six dimensions: (1) socio-demographic; (2) health; (3) motivations; (4) training characteristics; (5) running-related behaviour; and (6) beliefs and perceptions about health. Profiles were identified using a two-step hierarchical clustering analysis. Subsequently, 15 interviews were conducted with participating runners across each of the identified profiles. Qualitative analysis complemented the profiles characterization, explaining motivations to start and continue running, beliefs about risk factors and injury prevention, and the physical therapist’s role in rehabilitation. Statistical analysis from stage one was conducted using SPSS 22 with a confidence level of 5%. Qualitative data were analysed using thematic and content analyses.ResultsA total of 821 surveys were analysed (46% female), mean aged 36.6±10.0 years. Cluster analysis delineated four profiles (n = 752) according to years of running experience, weekly running volume and hours of weekly training. Profiles were named “Beginner” (n = 163); “Basic” (n = 164); “Middle” (n = 160) and “Advanced” (n = 265). Profiles were statistically different according to sex, age, years of running experience, training characteristics, previous injuries and use of technological devices (p<0.05). There were identified motivations to start and continue running. Beliefs about risk factors vary among stretching, footwear, training surface and overload. Runners identified the physical therapist as a specialist, involved in the rehabilitation process and showing empathy towards the patient. The identification of these profiles allows the generation of future prospective studies and clinical trials to evaluate risk and prognostic factors targeting specific populations of runners, with the ultimate aim of reducing running-related injury.
Objetivo: Conocer la percepción de informantes clave pertenecientes a la red de Atención Primaria de Salud en Chile, respecto al proceso de gestión asistencial y el impacto del programa nacional de Garantías Explícitas en Salud (GES) sobre la entrega de ayudas técnicas a personas mayores. Materiales y métodos: Un estudio cualitativo basado en análisis de casos múltiples, en el cual se realizó entrevistas semi-estructuradas a 8 informantes clave de la red asistencial, fue desarrollado en 2015 en tres comunas de Santiago, Chile. El análisis de la información recogida se realizó mediante análisis de contenido, y se finalizó el muestreo de máxima variación al saturar la información. Se resguardaron los criterios de rigor científico y el protocolo fue aprobado por un Comité de Ética. Resultados: Hay una percepción de cobertura y detección de necesidad como adecuada en pacientes bajo control, aunque desde la perspectiva de los informantes, hay desconocimiento de esta garantía en la población. La necesidad es detectada por cualquier profesional de salud, pero la indicación es exclusivamente médica, lo que genera barreras de acceso. Hay una entrega oportuna; sin embargo, no se realiza seguimiento ni se aprecia como parte de una atención integral. Se percibe que la ayuda técnica es de calidad y la articulación de la red es adecuada, aunque no hay retroalimentación a Atención Primaria de Salud. El impacto lo consideran positivo en pacientes y familiares: mejora la ejecución de actividades diarias y genera mayor autonomía y capacidad de desplazamiento. Conclusiones: Existe una percepción positiva de este programa GES y su impacto en la mejoría en la calidad de vida de vida de los pacientes. Pero, la entrega de ayudas técnicas se encuentra desvinculada de una atención integral, por ende, este programa prioriza sólo la garantía de oportunidad.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.
hi@scite.ai
10624 S. Eastern Ave., Ste. A-614
Henderson, NV 89052, USA
Copyright © 2024 scite LLC. All rights reserved.
Made with 💙 for researchers
Part of the Research Solutions Family.