This study aimed to compare the applicability of three methods of filling gaps in rainfall and temperature data from thirteen automatic weather stations (AWS) in the state of Pernambuco, from January to December 2019. The methods used were arithmetic mean, regional weighting, and simple linear regression. The data estimated by filling techniques have been subjected to comparison using R² and descriptive statistical analysis. The estimated data of air temperature presented R2 equal or very close to 1 for the three methods. On the other hand, the estimated data of rainfall showed values similar or closer to the real data only to regional weighting (R² = 1) and linear regression (R² = 0.99) methods. The smallest values of standard deviation (1.70) for temperature were obtained with linear regression. The regional weighting method and unfilled data showed greater uniformity for precipitation. The analyzed methods to estimate the climatic variables, air temperature, and precipitation, on a monthly scale, were efficient to fill in missing data in the evaluated AWS. The simple linear regression method is more efficient and adequate, followed by regional weighting, to fill in missing data in climate databases.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.
hi@scite.ai
10624 S. Eastern Ave., Ste. A-614
Henderson, NV 89052, USA
Copyright © 2024 scite LLC. All rights reserved.
Made with 💙 for researchers
Part of the Research Solutions Family.