No abstract

Single-injection coracoid infraclavicular brachial plexus block produces inconsistent anesthesia of the upper limb. In this study, we sought to determine the number of injections needed to provide a reasonably complete anesthesia of the upper limb with this approach. Seventy-five patients were randomly assigned to receive a coracoid block guided by nerve stimulator with 42 mL of 1.5% mepivacaine with a single-injection (Group 1), dual-injection (Group 2), or triple-injection (Group 3) technique. No search for a specific motor response was performed in any group. Sensory and motor block was assessed 5 and 20 min after the end of the injection of local anesthetic. Significantly less complete anesthesia to pinprick in the distributions of the axillary, musculocutaneous, radial, ulnar, and medial cutaneous forearm nerves was found in Group 1 at 20 min. Significantly less complete paralysis for arm, wrist, and hand movements was found in Group 1 at 20 min. No significant difference was found between Groups 2 and 3. We conclude that dual and triple injection of local anesthetic guided by nerve stimulator increases the efficacy of coracoid block when compared with a single-injection technique.

Stimulating catheters have been recently introduced in clinical practice. We assessed the efficacy of stimulating and nonstimulating catheter placement for pain control and local anesthetic requirements after hallux valgus repair with continuous sciatic popliteal nerve block in this comparative, randomized, blinded-to-observer study of 48 patients. A stimulating catheter was placed in groups S-125 and S-0625. The same catheter was inserted without stimulation in group NS-125. An infusion of 0.125% levobupivacaine was given in groups S-125 and NS-125, whereas 0.0625% levobupivacaine was used in group S-0625. All patients received an infusion of the test drug at a basal rate of 3 mL/h, with the possibility of an additional bolus of 3 mL every hour. Verbal analog scale (VAS) scores for pain were assessed between 6-8 h and between 19-23 h postoperatively. Multiple attempts were required for catheter insertion in all patients in groups S-125 and S-0625. Lower median (range) VAS scores for pain (0-100 points) were found in group S-125 at 6-8 h postoperatively when compared with groups S-0625 and NS-125: 5 (0-17.5) versus 60 (15-80) and 70 (25-80), respectively (P < 0.05); and lower VAS scores for pain were also found in group S-125 at 19-23 h when compared with group NS-125: 0 (0-0) and 7.5 (0-10), respectively (P < 0.05). Fewer patients required IV opioid analgesia in group S-125 than in groups S-0625 and NS-125: 0, 5, and 7 patients, respectively (P < 0.05). We conclude that efficacy in pain control was increased with stimulating catheter placement.

No abstract

Musculocutaneous-nerve stimulation and radial-nerve stimulation play predominant roles in the success of axillary brachial plexus block, although a triple-nerve stimulation technique is still required to produce complete anesthesia of the upper limb.

No abstract

Intraneural catheterization of the sciatic nerve may be a frequent finding and was not followed by nerve injury under the conditions of our small pilot study.

Elicitation of a median nerve response improved the efficacy of infraclavicular coracoid block when compared with a musculocutaneous nerve response. Complete paralysis and complete anesthesia of the upper limb were low in both groups.