SummaryIn the context of climate change and the depletion of fossil fuels, there is a great need for alternatives to petroleum in the transport sector. This review provides an overview of the production of second-generation bioethanol, which is distinguished from first-generation and subsequent generations of biofuels by its use of lignocellulosic biomass as raw material. The structural components of the lignocellulosic biomass such as cellulose, hemicellulose and lignin, are presented along with technological unit steps including pre-treatment, enzymatic hydrolysis, fermentation distillation and dehydration. The purpose of the pre-treatment step is to increase the surface area of carbohydrate available for enzymatic saccharification, while minimizing inhibitors. Performing the enzymatic hydrolysis releases fermentable sugars, which are converted by microbial catalysts into ethanol. The hydrolysates obtained after pre-treatment and enzymatic hydrolysis contain a wide spectrum of sugars, predominantly glucose and xylose.Genetically engineered microorganisms are therefore needed to carry out co-fermentation. The excess of harmful inhibitors in the hydrolysate, such as weak organic acids, furan derivatives and phenol components, can be removed by detoxification before fermentation. Effective saccharification further requires using co-acting exogenous hemicellulases and cellulolytic www.ftb.com.hrPlease note that this is an unedited version of the manuscript that has been accepted for publication. This version will undergo copyediting and typesetting before its final form for publication. We are providing this version as a service to our readers. The published version will differ from this one as a result of linguistic and technical corrections and layout editing.enzymes. Conventional species of distillers' yeast are unable to ferment pentoses into ethanol, and only a very few natural microorganisms, including yeast species like Candida shehatae, Pichia stipites, Scheffersomyces and Pachysolen tannophilus, metabolize xylose to ethanol.Enzymatic hydrolysis and fermentation can be performed in a number of ways, by separate saccharification and fermentation, simultaneous saccharification and fermentation or consolidated bioprocessing. Pentose-fermenting microorganisms can be obtained through genetic engineering, by introducing xylose-encoding genes into metabolism of a selected microorganism to optimize its use of xylose accumulated in the hydrolysate.
This study investigates the effect of double‐ or single‐stage distillation and different alcohol content in ‘hearts’ (middle fractions) on the distribution of aroma volatiles and undesirable compounds (methanol, hydrocyanic acid, ethyl carbamate) during distillation of plum brandies. Irrespective of the distillation method used, the first fractions (‘heads’) included mainly aliphatic aldehydes, acetals and esters as well as higher alcohols (1‐propanol, 2‐methyl‐1‐propanol, 1‐butanol, 2‐methyl‐1‐butanol and 3‐methyl‐1‐butanol). Furfural, 1‐hexanol, benzyl alcohol, 2‐phenylethanol and ethyl carbamate occurred in relatively high concentrations in the ‘tail’ fractions. Increasing the concentration of alcohol in the heart fractions from 70 to 90% v/v resulted in a gradual decrease in the concentration of all detected volatile compounds. Compared with single‐stage distillation, double distillation produced heart fractions with lower concentration of acetaldehyde and benzaldehyde and with higher contents of furfural and esters, such as isobutyl acetate and isoamyl acetate. There was a statistically significant increase in the amounts of methanol and ethyl carbamate obtained from double distillation compared with similar fractions derived from the single‐stage process. However, in all fractions these compounds occurred in concentrations much lower than the limits specified by EU regulations. The heart fraction from the double‐stage process with 83% v/v alcohol content received the best scores for aroma and flavour. Copyright © 2017 The Institute of Brewing & Distilling
Sugar beet pulp, a byproduct of sugar beet processing, can be used as a feedstock in second-generation ethanol production. The objective of this study was to investigate the effects of pretreatment, of the dosage of cellulase and hemicellulase enzyme preparations used, and of aeration on the release of fermentable sugars and ethanol yield during simultaneous saccharification and fermentation (SSF) of sugar beet pulp-based worts. Pressure-thermal pretreatment was applied to sugar beet pulp suspended in 2% w/w sulphuric acid solution at a ratio providing 12% dry matter. Enzymatic hydrolysis was conducted using Viscozyme and Ultraflo Max (Novozymes) enzyme preparations (0.015–0.02 mL/g dry matter). Two yeast strains were used for fermentation: Ethanol Red (S. cerevisiae) (1 g/L) and Pichia stipitis (0.5 g/L), applied sequentially. The results show that efficient simultaneous saccharification and fermentation of sugar beet pulp was achieved. A 6 h interval for enzymatic activation between the application of enzyme preparations and inoculation with Ethanol Red further improved the fermentation performance, with the highest ethanol concentration reaching 26.9 ± 1.2 g/L and 86.5 ± 2.1% fermentation efficiency relative to the theoretical yield.
Abstract:The objective of this study was to determine the efficiency of rye and barley starch hydrolysis in mashing processes using cereal malts as a source of amylolytic enzymes and starch, and to establish the volatile profile of the obtained agricultural distillates. In addition, the effects of the pretreatment method of unmalted cereal grains on the physicochemical composition of the prepared mashes, fermentation results, and the composition of the obtained distillates were investigated. The raw materials used were unmalted rye and barley grains, as well as the corresponding malts. All experiments were first performed on a semi-technical scale, and then verified under industrial conditions in a Polish distillery. The fermentable sugars present in sweet mashes mostly consisted of maltose, followed by glucose and maltotriose. Pressure-thermal treatment of unmalted cereals, and especially rye grains, resulted in higher ethanol content in mashes in comparison with samples subjected to pressureless liberation of starch. All agricultural distillates originating from mashes containing rye and barley grains and the corresponding malts were characterized by low concentrations of undesirable compounds, such as acetaldehyde and methanol. The distillates obtained under industrial conditions contained lower concentrations of higher alcohols (apart from 1-propanol) than those obtained on a semi-technical scale.
Spent yeasts, a co‐product from fermentation processes, are a source for unconvential autolysis processes. In this study, five post‐fermentation yeast strains that are often used in fermentation processes were used: Saccharomyces cerevisiae Ethanol Red (Lessafre), Kluyveromyces marxianus LOCK 0026, K. marxianus NCYC 179, Scheffersomyces stipitis NCYC 1541 and Pichia angusta NCYC 495. Autolysis was conducted at 50°C for 48 hours in the presence of saponins from Quillaja saponaria. The concentrations of proteins and free amino acids in the yeast autolysates were evaluated using IR spectroscopy and chromatography. The lysates were found to be good sources of essential amino acids, which constituted between 29.3% (S. cerevisiae) and 40.7% (K. marxianus LOCK 0026) of the amino acid pools. The largest pools of free amino acids were found in autolysates of S. cerevisiae Ethanol Red (44.9 g/L) and P. angusta NCYC 495 (40.53 g/L). Saponin can be used as an auxiliary or alternative to conventional methods of cell lysis, especially since Q. saponaria extracts are approved for use in foods and could have significant health benefits. The usability of five post‐fermentation yeast strains as a source of valuable nitrogen compounds in unconventional salt‐free lysates was demonstrated for the first time in the present study. Copyright © 2017 The Institute of Brewing & Distilling
Large amounts of waste biomass are generated in sugar factories from the processing of sugar beets. After diffusion with hot water to draw the sugar from the beet pieces, a wet material remains called pulp. In this study, waste sugar beet pulp biomass was enzymatically depolymerized, and the obtained hydrolyzates were subjected to fermentation processes. Bioethanol, biomethane, and biohydrogen were produced directly from the substrate or in combined mode. Stillage, a distillery by-product, was used as a feedstock for anaerobic digestion. During biosynthesis of ethanol, most of the carbohydrates released from the sugar beet pulp were utilized by a co-culture of Saccharomyces cerevisiae Ethanol Red, and Scheffersomyces stipitis LOCK0047 giving 12.6 g/L of ethanol. Stillage containing unfermented sugars (mainly arabinose, galactose and raffinose) was found to be a good substrate for methane production (444 dm 3 CH 4 /kg volatile solids (VS)). Better results were achieved with this medium than with enzymatic saccharified biomass. Thermal pre-treatment and adjusting the pH of the inoculum resulted in higher hydrogen production. The largest (p < 0.05) hydrogen yield (252 dm 3 H 2 /kg VS) was achieved with sugar beet stillage (SBS). In contrast, without pre-treatment the same medium yielded 35 dm 3 H 2 /kg VS. However, dark fermentation of biohydrogen was more efficient when sugar beet pulp hydrolyzate was used.
BackgroundSugar beet and intermediates of sugar beet processing are considered to be very attractive feedstock for ethanol production due to their content of fermentable sugars. In particular, the processing of the intermediates into ethanol is considerably facilitated because it does not require pretreatment or enzymatic treatment in contrast to production from starch raw materials. Moreover, the advantage of thick juice is high solid substance and saccharose content which eliminates problems with the storability of this feedstock.ResultsThe objective of this study were to investigate bioethanol production from thick juice worts and the effects of their concentration, the type of mineral supplement, as well as the dose of yeast inoculum on fermentation dynamics and ethanol yield.The obtained results show that to ensure efficient ethanolic fermentation of high gravity thick juice worts, one needs to use a yeast strain with high ethanol tolerance and a large amount of inoculum. The highest ethanol yield (94.9 ± 2.8% of the theoretical yield) and sugars intake of 96.5 ± 2.9% were obtained after the fermentation of wort with an extract content of 250 g/kg supplemented with diammonium hydrogen phosphate (0.3 g/L of wort) and inoculated with 2 g of Ethanol Red dry yeast per L of wort. An increase in extract content in the fermentation medium from 250 g/L to 280 g/kg resulted in decreased efficiency of the process. Also the distillates originating from worts with an extract content of 250 g/kg were characterized by lower acetaldehyde concentration than those obtained from worts with an extract content of 280 g/kg.ConclusionsUnder the favorable conditions determined in our experiments, 38.9 ± 1.2 L of 100% (v/v) ethyl alcohol can be produced from 100 kg of thick juice. The obtained results show that the selection of process conditions and the yeast for the fermentation of worts with a higher sugar content can improve the economic performance of the alcohol-distilling industry due to more efficient ethanol production, reduced consumption of cooling water, and energy for ethanol distillation, as well as a decreased volume of fermentation stillage.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.
hi@scite.ai
10624 S. Eastern Ave., Ste. A-614
Henderson, NV 89052, USA
Copyright © 2024 scite LLC. All rights reserved.
Made with 💙 for researchers
Part of the Research Solutions Family.