No abstract

The level of life satisfaction perceived during childhood and adolescence is an excellent indicator of healthy psychological emotional development. The main aim of this work is to study the levels of life satisfaction perceived by young people throughout their childhood and adolescence. To this end, an innovative retrospective approach is adopted that shows how the evolution of life satisfaction is perceived at different ages according to gender. The present study is based on a sample of 600 Spanish adolescents (58.1% girls; mean age = 16.64) who report the evolution of their life satisfaction from 6 years to 18, through the Life Satisfaction Chart (LSCh). The Goldberg Anxiety and Depression Scale (GADS) is also administered to record levels of anxiety and depression. The results indicate no gender differences in terms of life satisfaction during childhood. Levels of life satisfaction are significantly higher in childhood than in pre-adolescence and adolescence and a significant decrease in levels appearing towards the age of 11. As for gender, significant differences in life satisfaction appear from the age of 12, with girls being significantly more dissatisfied, more depressed and more anxious than boys. Current levels of anxiety and depression do not appear to interfere with retrospectively reported levels of life satisfaction throughout the developmental years studied, except among the female population, where minimal interference is detected. Life satisfaction retrospectively reported by young people shows a significant decrease after the age of 11 years, with greater emotional and psychological vulnerability after this age, mainly and notably among girls. The present results highlight the importance of psychological/affective care in the pre-adolescent and adolescent stages, especially among the female population.

No abstract

The main aim of the present study is to explore and test an indicator of subjective wellbeing for adolescents: the Present Overall Life Satisfaction (POLS), derived from subjects' consciously contextualized reflections on their own life cycle. We believe this to be a novel and innovative approach compared to those instruments traditionally used to date, given that it relates SWB measurement to its time axis. The article also explores this indicator's performance in relation to gender and levels of anxiety and depression.The sample comprised 614 adolescents with an average age of 16.6 years (Dt = 0.74; age range=16-19), 58.1% of whom were girls and 41.9% boys. As well as the proposed indicator, the Satisfaction with Life Scale (SWLS) and Students' Life Satisfaction Scales (SLSS) were used as indicators of subjective well-being, and the Goldberg Anxiety and Depression Scale (GADS) as indicators of unease. Life satisfaction scores were higher among boys than among girls. These significantly lower levels of satisfaction in adolescent girls are also associated with higher levels of anxiety and depression than among boys. The results confirm that the Present Overall Life Satisfaction (POLS) is a good indicator of subjective well-being, since it captures core aspects that are considered to form part of that construct. That said, it is also evident that it captures different aspects than those of traditional indicators based on context-free scales, thereby opening new avenues of research to better understanding how adolescents evaluate their overall satisfaction with life.

Healthcare professionals (HCPs) are among those most affected by the COVID-19 health emergency, with many presenting symptoms of anxiety and depression. Research shows that one of the factors involved in mitigating the impact of stressful situations is the use of cognitive emotional regulation mechanisms. The aims of this study were (a) to describe the functional and dysfunctional cognitive emotional regulation mechanisms (FRMs and DRMs) by gender, (b) to screen the main group of healthcare professionals who are candidates to receive psychological assistance based on FRMs and DRMs, and (c) to determine the HCP profile of candidates for psychological assistance. A cross-sectional descriptive study was conducted. Data were obtained from an adhoc questionnaire—the Cognitive Emotional Regulation Questionnaire (CERQ-18), the Generalized Anxiety Disorder scale (GAD-7), and the nine-item Patient Health Questionnaire (PHQ-9). The representative sample comprised 1452 HCPs. The results revealed significant differences between men and women in the use of DRMs. Women showed a higher use of catastrophizing (≤0.001) and rumination (0.008). The screening procedure detected that 7.5% (109 cases) of the HCPs were candidates to receive psychological support. According to the results of this study, age group (30–39 years old), professional activity (being a nurse or nursing assistant), and having psychological symptoms of anxiety and depression are variables that independently increase the probability of requiring psychological assistance. The gender variable was not found to be an independent factor when it comes to receiving psychological support. In conclusion, it is necessary to consider the influence of cognitive emotional regulation strategies employed by HCPs in the screening of candidates for psychological assistance and design effective interventions to reverse the emotional distress caused by COVID-19.