The envelope of human parainfluenza virus type 3 (HPF3) contains two viral glycoproteins, the hemagglutinin-neuraminidase (HN) and the fusion protein (F). HN, which is responsible for receptor attachment and for promoting F-mediated fusion, also possesses neuraminidase (receptor-destroying) activity. We reported previously that 4-guanidino-neu5Ac2en (4-GU-DANA) and related sialic acid-based inhibitors of HPF3 neuraminidase activity also inhibit HN-mediated receptor binding and fusion processes not involving neuraminidase activity. We have now examined this mechanism, as well as neuraminidase's role in the viral life cycle, using a neuraminidase-deficient HPF3 variant (C28a) and stable cell lines expressing C28a or wild-type (wt) HN. C28a, which has a wt F sequence and two point mutations in the HN gene corresponding to two amino acid changes in the HN protein, is the first HPF3 variant with insignificant neuraminidase activity. Cells expressing C28a HN did not bind erythrocytes at 4°C unless pretreated with neuraminidase, but no such pretreatment was required for hemadsorption activity (HAD) at 22 or 37°C. HAD was blocked by 4-GU-DANA, attesting to the ability of this compound to inhibit HN's receptor-binding activity. C28a or wt plaque enlargement, a process that involves cell-cell fusion and does not depend on virion release, is diminished by the presence of 4-GU-DANA, confirming the inhibitory effect of 4-GU-DANA on the fusogenic function of C28a HN. In C28a-infected cell monolayers, virion release and thus multicycle replication are severely restricted. This defect was corrected by supplementation of exogenous neuraminidase and also by the addition of 4-GU-DANA; neuraminidase destroys the receptors whereby newly formed C28a virions would remain attached to the cell surface, whereas 4-GU-DANA prevents the attachment itself, obviating the need for receptor cleavage. In accord with the ability of 4-GU-DANA to prevent attachment, the neuraminidase inhibitory effect of 4-GU-DANA on wt HPF3 did not diminish virion release into the medium. Thus, it is by inhibition of viral entry and syncytium formation that sialic acid analogs like 4-GU-DANA may counteract wt HPF3 infection.

Viral interference is characterized by the resistance of infected cells to infection by a challenge virus.Mechanisms of viral interference have not been characterized for human parainfluenza virus type 3 (HPF3), and the possible role of the neuraminidase (receptor-destroying) enzyme of the hemagglutinin-neuraminidase (HN) glycoprotein has not been assessed. To determine whether continual HN expression results in depletion of the viral receptors and thus prevents entry and cell fusion, we tested whether cells expressing wild-type HPF3 HN are resistant to viral infection. Stable expression of wild-type HN-green fluorescent protein (GFP) on cell membranes in different amounts allowed us to establish a correlation between the level of HN expression, the level of neuraminidase activity, and the level of protection from HPF3 infection. Cells with the highest levels of HN expression and neuraminidase activity on the cell surface were most resistant to infection by HPF3. To determine whether this resistance is attributable to the viral neuraminidase, we used a cloned variant HPF3 HN that has two amino acid alterations in HN leading to the loss of detectable neuraminidase activity. Cells expressing the neuraminidase-deficient variant HN-GFP were not protected from infection, despite expressing HN on their surface at levels even higher than the wild-type cell clones. Our results demonstrate that the HPF3 HN-mediated interference effect can be attributed to the presence of an active neuraminidase enzyme activity and provide the first definitive evidence that the mechanism for attachment interference by a paramyxovirus is attributable to the viral neuraminidase.Viral interference is defined as a state induced by an infecting virus that is characterized by the resistance of cells to subsequent infection by a challenge virus (7). Interference can be due to several different mechanisms, one of which is attachment interference. In this situation the interfering virus destroys or blocks the receptors for the superinfecting virus (7). Understanding mechanisms of viral interference can lead to strategies for controlling viral infection.The envelope of human parainfluenza virus type 3 (HPF3) contains two viral glycoproteins, the hemagglutinin-neuraminidase protein (HN) and the fusion protein (F). Infection of cells by HPF3 is initiated by attachment of the virus to the host cell through interaction of the HN glycoprotein with a sialic acid-containing cell surface receptor. Penetration and uncoating of the virus result from F protein-mediated fusion of the viral envelope with the plasma membrane of the cell, leading to the release of the viral nucleocapsid into the cytoplasm. In the case of HPF3 and other paramyxoviruses, HN as well as F are involved in membrane fusion, and cofunction of the HN and F glycoproteins was found to be necessary for syncytium formation (9, 10, 14, 17). Infection also results in fusion between cells, which involves the interaction of F and HN proteins expressed on the surface of an infected cell with the m...

Recent in vivo studies suggest that hMPV is a poor inducer of inflammatory cytokines and that clinical symptoms may not be related to immune-mediated pathogenesis as it has been proposed for respiratory syncytial virus (RSV) and human parainfluenza 3 (HPF3). Dendritic cells (DCs) are specialized antigen presenting cells, and very effective at inducing specific CTLs after encountering invading viruses. Interactions of hMPV with DCs have not been characterized. We hypothesized that the relatively mild inflammatory responses observed in vivo after hMPV infection might be at least in part due to hMPV's poor ability to stimulate and activate DCs. hMPV actively infected immature monocyte-derived CD11c+/HLA-DR+ DCs. However, in contrast to RSV or HPF3, hMPV caused no gross cytopathic effects such as syncytia, lytic infection, or massive apoptosis. DCs exposed to hMPV show no cytopathic effects under tissue culture conditions permissive for viral replication. The surface maturation markers CD83 and CD86 were not significantly up-regulated in infected DCs as compared to uninfected controls, while expression of CD80 appeared increased. Stimulation of hMPV-infected DCs with LPS resulted in the enhanced expression of all these surface markers indicating that hMPV is not generally suppressing DC maturation. Overall, cytokine expression remained low. These results indicate that hMPV does not induce effective DC maturation in vitro and suggest that the weak stimulation of DCs may account for the overall low immunogenicity of this virus observed in vivo.

No abstract

Mechanisms of dendritic cells (DCs) immunomodulation by parainfluenza viruses have not been characterized. We analyzed whether the human parainfluenza 3 (HPF3) virus hemagglutinin-neuraminidase glycoprotein (HN) might influence DC maturation. HN possesses a receptor binding function and a neuraminidase or desialidating activity. To assess whether the neuraminidase activity of HN affects DC maturation, human myeloid DCs were exposed to either live or UV-inactivated HPF3 viruses containing wild type or a mutated form of HN with decreased neuraminidase activity. Exposure of human DCs to either UV-inactivated or live virus induced up-regulation of CD83 and CD86 surface markers, morphological changes, and a cytokine expression pattern consistent with maturation. However, the level of maturation was found to be lower in DCs infected with the neuraminidase deficient variant as compared to the wild type. These results suggest that during the course of viral infection, HN's neuraminidase activity may play an important role contributing to maturation and activation of DCs.