Benign neoplasms were predominant (80%), and the most frequent tumor was pleomorphic adenoma. FNAC had a 100% accuracy to differentiate benign vs malignant tumors. The most common post-operative sequel was compromise of a cranial nerve, and three patients presented local complications after surgery. After follow-up, only three of 41 patients with benign tumors had recurring disease.
Background. There are still few data on the activity and safety of cetuximab-based salvage chemotherapy after immunotherapy (SCAI) in patients with squamous cell cancer of the head and neck (SCCHN). Materials and Methods. Retrospective study of patients with SCCHN who received cetuximab-based SCAI after PD1 or PDL1 (PD(L)1) inhibitors. Overall response rate (ORR) and disease control rate (DCR) with SCAI and with last chemotherapy before immunotherapy (LCBI) by RECIST 1.1, percentage change from baseline in target lesions (PCTL), progression-free survival (PFS), overall survival (OS), treatment compliance and toxicity were evaluated. Results. Between March 2016 and November 2019, 23 patients were identified. SCAI consisted of cetuximabbased combinations (3wkCDDP-5FU-Cetuximab (n=2), wkPaclitaxel-Cetuximab (n=17), wkCDDP-Cetuximab (n=2), wkCBDCA-Paclitaxel-Cetuximab (n=2)). ORR was 56.5% (11 partial response (PR), 2 complete response (CR)). DCR was 78.3%. Among 13 objective responders, median best PCTL was-53.5% (range:-30% to-100%). Median OS and PFS were 12m and 6m, respectively. In 10 patients receiving LCBI, ORR to LCBI was 40%, while ORR to SCAI achieved 60%. In LCBI-treated patients median PFS with LCBI was 8m and median PFS and OS with SCAI were 7m and 12m, respectively. Reduced dose intensity of the chemotherapy and cetuximab components occurred in 82.6% and 52.2% of the patients. Grade 1 or 2 AEs occurred in all patients. Grade 3 or 4 AEs developed in 65%, being grade 3 in all of them except in one patient (grade 4 neutropenia). There were no treatment-related deaths. Conclusion. Cetuximab-based salvage chemotherapy after PD(L)1 inhibitors associated with high response rates and deep tumor reductions with a manageable safety profile. Subsequent lines of therapy may explain the long survival achieved in our series. These results invite to design studies to elucidate the best therapeutic sequence in patients with SCCHN in the immunotherapy era. The Oncologist 2021;9999:• • Implications for Practice: Cetuximab-based salvage chemotherapy (SCAI) achieved high response rates in patients with R/M SCCHN after progression to PD1/PDL1 inhibitors. Objective response rate was higher and progression-free survival was comparable to that of chemotherapy administered before immunotherapy (IO). In most patients, SCAI consisted of weekly, welltolerated regimens. These observations have implications for current practice due to the limited evidence to date in SCCHN and the scant therapeutic options in this disease, and invite to elucidate which may be the best treatment sequence for head and neck cancer patients in the IO era.
The multivariate analysis of specific mortality showed that patients classified as having severe comorbidity (CCI) were more likely to die (adjusted hazard ratio (adjHR) 1.85, 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.07-3.17). This difference was more important in patients with early tumor stages than in those with advanced stages.
The first intracochlear perfusion with artificial perilymph produced significant effects in the CAP-AN that could be related to the surgical procedure. These effects were analysed separately from the effects produced by the KA. In particular, the KA administered intracochlearly produced a significant increase in the latency and a decrease in the amplitude of the CAP-AN N1 wave compared with the controls that were perfused twice with artificial perilymph.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.