BackgroundThe programmed death receptor 1 (PD-1) protein is a cell-surface receptor on certain lymphocytes that, with its ligand programmed death ligand 1 (PD-L1), helps to down-regulate immune responses. Many cancer types express PD-L1 and evade immune recognition via the PD-1/PD-L1 interaction. Precision therapies targeting the PD-1/PD-L1 pathway have the potential to improve response and thereby offer a novel treatment avenue to some patients with cancer. However, this new therapeutic approach requires reliable methods for identifying patients whose cancers are particularly likely to respond. Therefore, we conducted a systematic literature review assessing evidence on test validation and scoring algorithms for PD-L1 immunohistochemistry (IHC) tests that might be used to select potentially responsive patients with bladder/urothelial cell, lung, gastric, or ovarian cancers for immunotherapy treatment.Methods and resultsTo identify evidence on commercially available PD-L1 IHC assays, we systematically searched MEDLINE and Embase for relevant studies published between January 2010 and September 2016 and appraised abstracts from recent oncology conferences (January 2013 to November 2016). Publications that met the predefined inclusion criteria were extracted and key trends summarized.In total, 26 eligible primary studies were identified, all of which reported on the test validation metrics associated with PD-L1 IHC tests in lung cancer, most using immunohistochemistry testing. There was significant heterogeneity among the available tests for PD-L1. Specifically, no definitive cutoff for PD-L1 positivity was identifiable, with more than one threshold being reported for most antibodies. Studies also differed as to whether they evaluated tumor cells only or tumor cells and tumor-infiltrating immune cells. However, all of the tests developed and validated to support a therapeutic drug in the context of phase 2–3 clinical trials reported more than 90% inter-reader concordance. In contrast, other PD-L1 antibodies identified in the literature reported poorer concordance.ConclusionsPublished validation metric data for PD-L1 tests are mainly focused on immunohistochemistry tests from studies in lung cancer. The variability in test cutoffs and standards for PD-L1 testing suggests that there is presently no standardized approach. This current variability may have implications for the uptake of precision treatments.

IntroductionFew studies have examined the epidemiology of herpes zoster (HZ) and postherpetic neuralgia (PHN) in China. The aim of this study was to estimate the prevalence of HZ and PHN in China, and to examine the clinical characteristics of patients identified with PHN.MethodsThis was a cross-sectional study conducted in 24 hospitals in seven cities in China. Prevalence of HZ and PHN was determined by physician (n = 100) chart review of patients (n = 36,170) aged ≥ 40 years seeking medical care over a 30- to 60-day period. The health history of patients identified with PHN was obtained and included time since diagnosis of HZ or PHN, time since onset of PHN-related pain, and the methods used for diagnosing HZ and PHN.ResultsThe prevalence rates of HZ and PHN were 7.7% [95% confidence interval (CI) 7.5–8.0] and 2.3% (95% CI 2.2–2.5), respectively. Of patients with HZ, 29.8% developed PHN. Rates of HZ and PHN increased with age and were highest in patients aged ≥ 70 years (10.6% and 4.1%, respectively). The majority of patients with PHN were diagnosed with HZ (80.9%) and PHN (83.8%) for < 1 year, and had experienced PHN-related pain for < 1 year (80.5%). Patient description and clinical examination were most commonly used to diagnose HZ and PHN.ConclusionThese results provide current estimates of the prevalence of HZ and PHN in the general adult population in urban China. These rates are similar to previously reported rates in China and worldwide, and highlight the global nature of HZ and PHN.FundingPfizer Inc.

Purpose: Alopecia areata (AA) is an autoimmune disease characterized by the development of non-scarring alopecia. The prevalence is not well known, and estimates vary considerably with no recent estimates in the United States (US). The objective of this study was to define the current AA point prevalence estimate among the general population in the US overall and by severity. Patients and Methods: We administered an online, cross-sectional survey to a representative sample of the US population. Participants self-screening as positive for AA using the Alopecia Assessment Tool (ALTO) also completed the Severity of Alopecia Tool (SALT) to measure the severity of disease as a percent of scalp hair loss. Self-reported AA participants were invited to upload photographs for adjudication of AA by 3 clinicians. Results: The average age of participants was 43 years. Approximately half of the participants (49.2%) were male, and the majority were white (77.1%) and not of Hispanic origin (93.2%). Among the 511 self-reported AA participants, 104 (20.4%) uploaded photographs for clinician evaluation. Clinician-adjudicated point prevalence of AA was 0.21% (95% CI: 0.17%, 0.25%) overall, 0.12% (95% CI: 0.09%, 0.15%) for "mild" disease (≤50% SALT score), and 0.09% (95% CI: 0.06%, 0.11%) for "moderate to severe" disease (>50% SALT score) with 0.04% (95% CI: 0.02%, 0.06%) for the alopecia totalis/alopecia universalis (100% SALT score) "moderate to severe" subgroup. The average SALT score was 44.4% overall, 8.8% for "mild", and 93.4% for "moderate to severe". Conclusion: This study suggests that the current AA prevalence in the US is similar to the upper estimates from the 1970s at approximately 0.21% (700,000 persons) with the current prevalence of "moderate to severe" disease at approximately 0.09% (300,000 persons). Given this prevalence and the substantial impact of AA on quality of life, the burden of AA within the US is considerable.

OBJECTIVES:To evaluate primary nonadherence [PNA] to cholesterol medications and compare health care outcomes between primary adherent and nonadherent patients. METHODS: This retrospective cohort study identified all patients who were treatment-naïve to antihyperlipidemics patients with at least one new cholesterol prescription written during the period of December 1, 2009 to February 28, 2010. PNA was defined as the failure to fill a prescription within 90 days of when it was written [index date]. Patients were followed for 18 months after the index date for healthcare outcomes of low-density lipoprotein [LDL] values, cardiac/stroke events, ER visits and all-cause or cardiac/stroke-related hospitalizations. Descriptive statistics were used to compare baseline characteristics and health care outcomes between primary adherent and nonadherent patients. Cox proportional hazard models were used to estimate the hazard ratio [HR] as a measure of the relative risk of each event in the primary nonadherent in comparison to the primary adherent after controlling for patient and physician characteristics. Patients were censored at the end of the follow-up period. RESULTS: A total 17,400 patients were identified during the study period and 15% were primary nonadherent. At baseline, primary nonadherent patients were sicker than primary adherent patients with significantly higher Charlson comorbidity index values, prescription use, ER visits and hospitalizations in the prior year. LDL values decreased after the index date for both groups, but primary adherent patients had a significantly greater decrease in LDL values on average [-37.2 vs. -14.9 (pϽ0.0001)]. After adjusting for baseline covariates, the resulting HR (95%CI) was 0.83 (0.69, 0.99) for cardiac/ stroke events, 0.99 (0.91, 1.09) for ER visits, 0.87 (0.77, 0.99) for all-cause hospitalization, and 0.72 (0.44, 1.12) for CV-related hospitalization. CONCLUSIONS: Primary nonadherent patients experienced smaller decreases in LDL values, but were not found to be at increased risk for cardiac/stroke events, ER visits or hospitalization during the follow-up period.

Background Little is known about the patient-reported and economic burdens of postherpetic neuralgia (PHN) among China’s urban population. Methods This noninterventional study was conducted among adults ≥40 years with PHN who were seeking medical care at eight urban hospitals in China. At one study site, patients completed a questionnaire evaluating the patient-reported disease burden (N=185). The questionnaire consisted of validated patient-reported outcomes including the Brief Pain Inventory (BPI), 5-dimension, 3-level EuroQol (EQ-5D-3L), Medical Outcomes Study Sleep Scale, and Work Productivity and Activity Impairment Questionnaire for Specific Health Problems. Questions on non-pharmacologic therapy and out-of-pocket (OOP) expenses were also included. At all study sites, physicians (N=100) completed a structured review of patient charts (N=828), which was used to derive health care resource utilization and associated costs from the societal perspective. Annual costs in Chinese Yuan Renminbi (RMB) for the year 2016 were converted to US dollars (US$). Results Patients (N=185, mean age 63.0 years, 53.5% female) reported pain of moderate severity (mean BPI score 4.6); poor sleep quantity (average of 5.3 hrs per night) and quality; and poorer health status on the EQ-5D-3L relative to the general Chinese population. Respondents also reported average annual OOP costs of RMB 16,873 (US$2541) per patient, mainly for prescription PHN medications (RMB 8990 [US$1354]). Substantial work impairment among employed individuals resulted in annual indirect costs of RMB 28,025 (US$4221). In the chart review, physicians reported that patients (N=828) had substantial health resource utilization, especially office visits; 98% had all-cause and 95% had PHN-related office visits. Total annual direct medical costs were RMB 10,002 (US$1507), mostly driven by hospitalizations (RMB 8781 [US$1323]). Conclusion In urban China, PHN is associated with a patient-reported burden, affecting sleep, quality-of-life, and daily activities including work impairment, and an economic burden resulting from direct medical costs and indirect costs due to lost productivity. These burdens suggest the need for appropriate prevention and management of PHN.

Among patients initiating pregabalin or gabapentin, there were no significant differences between the drugs in the pre- to post-index changes in all-cause total healthcare costs, despite the increase in prescription costs for pregabalin.

ObjectivesEstimate the prevalence of neuropathic pain (NeP) among chronic pain patients attending Brazilian hospitals and pain clinics in São Paulo, Ceara, and Bahia and explore clinical characteristics by subtypes: painful diabetic peripheral neuropathy (pDPN), central neuropathic pain (CNP), chronic low back pain with a neuropathic component (CLBP-NeP), postherpetic neuralgia (PHN), post-traumatic neuropathic pain (PTN), and post-surgical neuropathic pain (PSN).MethodsPhysicians screened patients reporting chronic pain for ≥3 months (n=2,118) for probable NeP, using the Douleur Neuropathique 4 questionnaire and physician assessment, and reported their NeP subtype(s), symptoms, and medications. Identified NeP patients completed a questionnaire including treatment experiences, quality of life EuroQol 5 Dimensions [EQ-5D]), pain severity and interference (Brief Pain Inventory [BPI]), and Work Productivity and Activity Impairment scales. Descriptive analyses were performed by NeP subtype.ResultsThe prevalence of probable NeP was 14.5% (n=307). NeP patients were mostly female (80.5%), middle-aged (mean [M]=52.5, SD=13.9), and Pardo (44.3%). Of those diagnosed with an NeP subtype (n=209), the largest proportions were CLBP-NeP (36.8%), followed by pDPN (18.7%), CNP (17.7%), PTN (17.2%), PSN (13.4%), and PHN (3.3%). Across subtypes, the most widely reported symptoms were numbness (range: 62.2%–89.7%) and hyperalgesia (range: 32.1%–76.9%) and the most commonly prescribed pain analgesics were NSAID (range: 18.2%–57.1%), opioids (range: 0.0%–39.3%), and antiepileptics (range: 18.2%–57.1%). PTN and PSN patients reported the least favorable EQ-5D index scores (M=0.42, SD=0.19) and BPI-Pain Severity scores (M=7.0, SD=1.9), respectively. Those diagnosed with CNP had the least favorable BPI-Pain Interference scores (M=6.0, SD=2.7). Patients with PHN reported the least impairment based on EQ-5D index scores (M=0.60, SD=0.04). Those with pDPN had the most favorable BPI scores (BPI-Pain Severity: M=4.6, SD=2.3; BPI-Pain Interference: M=4.7, SD=2.7).ConclusionEvaluation of chronic pain patients in Brazil yielded a 14.5% probable NeP prevalence. NSAIDs and opioids were commonly used, and there was a high incidence of NeP-related symptoms with varying levels of dysfunction across subtypes.

Hyperuricemia and hypouricemia were associated with an increased risk of CV events.