To determine whether functional and psychosocial outcomes associated with hearing impairment are a direct result or stem from prevalent comorbidity, we analyzed the impact of two levels of reported hearing impairment on health and psychosocial functioning one year later with adjustments for baseline chronic conditions. Physical functioning, mental health, and social functioning decreased in a dose-response pattern for those with progressive levels of hearing impairment compared with those reporting no impairment. Our results demonstrate an independent impact of hearing impairment on functional outcomes, reveal increasing problems with higher levels of impairment, and support the importance of preventing and treating this highly prevalent condition.
Findings are discussed in relation to theoretical perspectives regarding stigma and ageism and suggest the need to destigmatize hearing loss by promoting its assessment and treatment as well as emphasizing the importance of remaining actively engaged to support positive physical and cognitive functioning.
These impairments can be partially ameliorated through prevention, assessment, and treatment strategies. Greater attention to sensory impairments by clinicians, patients, public health advocates, and researchers is needed to enhance functioning in older adults.
Understanding criteria used by older persons to assess their own successful aging should enhance the conceptualization and measurement of this elusive concept.
IMPORTANCENearly 38 million individuals in the United States have untreated hearing loss, which is associated with cognitive and functional decline. National initiatives to address hearing loss are currently under way.OBJECTIVE To determine whether untreated hearing loss is associated with increased health care cost and utilization on the basis of data from a claims database.DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS Retrospective, propensity-matched cohort study of persons with and without untreated hearing loss based on claims for health services rendered between January 1, 1999, and December 31, 2016, from a large health insurance database. There were 154 414, 44 852, and 4728 participants at the 2-, 5-, and 10-year follow-up periods, respectively. The study was conceptualized and data were analyzed between September 2016 and November 2017.EXPOSURES Untreated hearing loss (ie, hearing loss that has not been treated with hearing devices) was identified via claims measures.MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES Medical costs, inpatient hospitalizations, total days hospitalized, 30-day hospital readmission, emergency department visits, and days with at least 1 outpatient visit.
The purposes of this study were to determine if there were differences in pain intensity scores, pain duration scores, mood states, and quality of life of oncology outpatients whose pain intensity scores were congruent with their family caregivers compared to patients whose pain intensity scores were non-congruent and to determine if there were differences in mood states, health status, and caregiver strain between family caregivers whose pain intensity scores were congruent with their family members and those family caregivers whose pain intensity scores were non-congruent. A total of 78 patient-caregiver dyads participated in the study. Patients completed a Demographic Questionnaire, a Cancer Pain Questionnaire, the Profile of Mood States, and the Multidimensional Quality of Life Scale-Cancer 2. Family caregivers completed a demographic questionnaire, the Profile of Mood States, the Caregiver Strain Index, and the Medical Outcome Study Short-Form Health Survey. Both patients and family caregivers rated the patient's pain intensity using a visual analogue scale (VAS). Patients in the non-congruent dyads (i.e. difference of >10 on the VAS score) had significantly more mood disturbance and a poorer quality of life than patients in the congruent dyads. Family caregivers in the non-congruent dyads had significantly higher caregiver strain score than caregivers in the congruent dyads. These findings suggest that differences in the perception of the pain experience between patients and their family caregivers is associated with deleterious outcomes for the patient and their family caregivers.
Despite contributing substantially to disability in the United States, agerelated hearing loss is an underappreciated public health concern. Loss of hearing sensitivity has been documented in two-thirds of adults aged 70 years and older and has been associated with communication difficulties, lower health-related quality of life, and decreased physical and cognitive function. Management strategies for age-related hearing loss are costly, yet the indirect costs due to lost productivity among people with communication difficulties are also substantial and likely to grow. Hearing aids can improve health-related quality of life, but the majority of people with documented hearing loss do not report using them. Uncovering effective means to improve the utilization of hearing health care services is essential for meeting the hearing health care demands of our aging population. The importance of hearing for general well-being warrants an effort to enhance awareness among the general population of the indications of hearing loss and options for assistance.
This study compares the health of 42 grandparent, 44 spouse, and 130 adult-child caregivers with 1,669 noncaregivers in 1994 and 1974. In 1994, all three caregiver groups had poorer mental health than the noncaregivers; grandparent caregivers also had poorer physical health and greater activity limitations. Spouse and adult-child caregivers had not differed from the noncaregivers 20 years prior, but grandparent caregivers had experienced poorer health than the noncaregivers and more stressful life events than the other caregivers. Caregiving appears to add new burdens to otherwise normal lives for spouse and adult-child caregivers, while being yet another aspect of a difficult life course for grandparent caregivers.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.