Citizenship (Hardback)-Waterstones Dean, Hartley. and Melrose, Margaret. Poverty, riches, and social citizenship / Hartley Dean, with Margaret Melrose ; foreword by Ruth Lister ; consultant editor, Making sense of social citizenship: some user views on welfare. TH Marshalls proposition that social citizenship constitutes the core idea of a. Dean, H. with Melrose, M. (1999) Poverty, Riches and Social Citizenship, Policy change, public attitudes and social citizenship: Does .-Google Books Result Poverty, Riches and Social Citizenship [HARTLEY DEAN] on Amazon.com. *FREE* shipping on qualifying offers. A Problem of Riches: Towards a new Social Policy Research. Buy Poverty, Riches and Social Citizenship by Hartley Dean (ISBN: 9780333764985) from Amazons Book Store. Free UK delivery on eligible orders. undermining social citizenship-International Social Security. poor people call with equal justice a problem of riches. In that time academics to overcome social polarisation through eliminating the problem of poverty. .. confrontation between the public sphere of citizenship and the operation of a. Professor Hartley Dean Poverty, riches and social citizenship
Reflecting on my experience of leading several qualitative research projects to investigate ‘sensitive’ topics with potentially ‘vulnerable’ participants, this paper considers the impact and consequences of increased ethical regulation in relation to my own research field and social research more generally. It argues that extending ethical regulation threatens social research in general, and specifically, threatens the study of ‘sensitive’ topics with ‘vulnerable’ populations. The consequences of increased ethical regulation may contradict its intention and place ‘vulnerable’ participants at greater risk than ‘sensitive’ research undertaken with such groups in earlier historical periods. The paper urges social researchers to act collectively, to engage with ethical regulatory regimes in order to challenge the threats they pose to scholarship, and by doing so, defend the value of social research for advancing knowledge so that our scholarship might better serve the populations we study.
This article presents findings from a study of the attitudes and beliefs of social security claimants engaged in benefit fraud. The basis for a taxonomy of such claimants is outlined, drawing upon concepts of reflexivity and anxiety. This is compared and contrasted with other theoretically-drawn taxonomies, one relating to workplace crime, the other to the consumption of social care services. Finally, the article considers whether benefit fraud is intelligible as resistance to social control. It is argued that benefit fraud represents a conservative form of resistance. Benefit fraud does not signify a "culture" of resistance, so much as a "manageable" form of rule-breaking.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.