No abstract

The Breastfeeding Attrition Prediction Tool (BAPT) is based on the theory of planned behavior, which explains behavior as a function of attitudes, subjective norm, and perceived control. The BAPT subscales are positive and negative attitudes toward breastfeeding, family and professional expectations, and perceived ability to be successful. The purpose of this study was to test the reliability and validity of the BAPT among 269 women who planned to breastfeed for at least 8 weeks. Subjects completed the BAPT in the hospital and during a telephone interview at 8 weeks. Based on factor analysis, several items were deleted. Using discriminant function analysis, the modified BAPT was an effective predictor of 78% of women who stopped breastfeeding before 8 weeks and 68% of those who were still breastfeeding. There is potential for the modified BAPT to be an adjunct for the clinician in identifying women at risk for early cessation of breastfeeding.

In earlier studies, the Breastfeeding Attrition Prediction Tool (BAPT) demonstrated predictive validity in the postpartum period. The purpose of this study was to compare the effectiveness of a modified version of the BAPT when given in the last trimester (BAPT1) and following delivery (BAPT2) in predicting breastfeeding attrition among 117 women who planned to breastfeed for at least 8 weeks. Subjects completed the BAPT during a prenatal breastfeeding class and again at delivery, and they received a phone call at 8 weeks to determine breastfeeding status. In this study, neither of the two administrations of the BAPT was predictive of breastfeeding status at 8 weeks. Findings here may differ because subjects in the current study were all committed enough to attend breastfeeding class and, thus, varied less on commitment than women in earlier studies. Significant associations were found with level of education and having a close relative who breastfed. To assist the perinatal educator in identifying women most at risk for early cessation of breastfeeding, the use of three questions regarding level of education, family support, and breastfeeding preparation is suggested.

No abstract

This correlational study examined burnout in doctorally prepared nurse faculty and its relationships to management style, collegial support, and workload. The Matthews Burnout Scale and the Maslach Burnout Inventory were used to measure burnout of 400 doctorally prepared American Nurses Association (ANA) members employed as faculty in schools of nursing. Analysis of 236 (59%) returns revealed that 39% of the faculty experienced moderate to high levels of burnout. Significant negative relationships (p<.05) were found between burnout and participative management, presence of collégial support, and time spent in research and in clinical practice. Multiple regression indicated that management style was the strongest predictor of burnout, with collégial support the second predictor.