Inositol polyphosphate 4-phosphatase type II (INPP4B) negatively regulates phosphatidylinositol 3-kinase signaling and is a tumor suppressor in some types of cancers. However, we have found that it is frequently upregulated in human colon cancer cells. Here we show that silencing of INPP4B blocks activation of Akt and serum- and glucocorticoid-regulated kinase 3 (SGK3), inhibits colon cancer cell proliferation and retards colon cancer xenograft growth. Conversely, overexpression of INPP4B increases proliferation and triggers anchorage-independent growth of normal colon epithelial cells. Moreover, we demonstrate that the effect of INPP4B on Akt and SGK3 is associated with inactivation of phosphate and tensin homolog through its protein phosphatase activity and that the increase in INPP4B is due to Ets-1-mediated transcriptional upregulation in colon cancer cells. Collectively, these results suggest that INPP4B may function as an oncogenic driver in colon cancer, with potential implications for targeting INPP4B as a novel approach to treat this disease.
Previous studies have suggested that immunotherapy with dendritic cell (DC) vaccines may be effective in treatment of patients with AJCC stage IV melanoma. We examined this treatment in phase I/II studies in 33 patients with good performance status and low volume disease. Nineteen patients received DCs plus autologous lysates and 14 patients DCs plus peptides from the melanoma antigens MAGE-3.A2, tyrosinase, gp100, and MART-1. Keyhole limpet hemocyanin (KLH) was used as a helper protein and influenza peptide was given as a positive control. DCs were produced from adherent cells in blood lymphocytes (monocytic DCs), grown in IL-4 and GM-CSF without a maturation step. The DCs were injected into inguinal lymph nodes at weekly intervals (x4), 2 weeks (x1), and 4-weekly intervals (x2). There were 3 responses (3 partial responses) and 1 mixed response in the 19 patients treated with DCs plus autologous lysates. No responses were seen in the group treated with DCs plus peptides. Stable disease (defined as no progression over a period of 3 months) was seen in 4 patients in group 1 and 5 patients in group 2. Treatment was not associated with significant side effects. We examined whether DTH skin tests or assays of IFN-gamma cytokine production may be useful predictors of clinical responses. Twenty-two of 30 patients had DTH responses to KLH and 12 of 13 patients had DTH responses to the influenza peptide. Five of 15 DTH responses were seen against autologous lysates. This was strongly correlated with clinical responses. Approximately half the patients had responses to MART-1 peptide and a third to the other melanoma peptides. Similarly, cytokine production assays showed responses to influenza in 7 of 13 patients, and approximately one third of patients had responses to the other peptides. No IFN-gamma responses were seen in 5 patients against their autologous lysates. There was no correlation between assays of IFN-gamma production and clinical responses. The present studies suggest that autologous lysates may be more effective than the melanoma peptides used in the study as the source of antigen for DC vaccines. DTH responses to autologous lysates appear useful predictors of clinical responses, but further work is needed to identify other measures associated with clinical responses.
The effect of MTH1 inhibition on cancer cell survival has been elusive. Here we report that although silencing of MTH1 does not affect survival of melanoma cells, TH588, one of the first-in-class MTH1 inhibitors, kills melanoma cells through apoptosis independently of its inhibitory effect on MTH1. Induction of apoptosis by TH588 was not alleviated by MTH1 overexpression or introduction of the bacterial homolog of MTH1 that has 8-oxodGTPase activity but cannot be inhibited by TH588, indicating that MTH1 inhibition is not the cause of TH588-induced killing of melanoma cells. Although knockdown of MTH1 did not impinge on the viability of melanoma cells, it rendered melanoma cells sensitive to apoptosis induced by the oxidative stress inducer elesclomol. Of note, treatment with elesclomol also enhanced TH588-induced apoptosis, whereas a reactive oxygen species scavenger or an antioxidant attenuated the apoptosis triggered by TH588. Indeed, the sensitivity of melanoma cells to TH588 was correlated with endogenous levels of reactive oxygen species. Collectively, these results indicate that the cytotoxicity of TH588 toward melanoma cells is not associated with its inhibitory effect on MTH1, although it is mediated by cellular production of ROS.
Protein products of the regenerating islet-derived (REG) gene family are important regulators of many cellular processes. Here we functionally characterise a non-protein coding product of the family, the long noncoding RNA (lncRNA) REG1CP that is transcribed from a DNA fragment at the family locus previously thought to be a pseudogene. REG1CP forms an RNA–DNA triplex with a homopurine stretch at the distal promoter of the REG3A gene, through which the DNA helicase FANCJ is tethered to the core promoter of REG3A where it unwinds double stranded DNA and facilitates a permissive state for glucocorticoid receptor α (GRα)-mediated REG3A transcription. As such, REG1CP promotes cancer cell proliferation and tumorigenicity and its upregulation is associated with poor outcome of patients. REG1CP is also transcriptionally inducible by GRα, indicative of feedforward regulation. These results reveal the function and regulation of REG1CP and suggest that REG1CP may constitute a target for cancer treatment.
We conclude that mature DC preparations may be superior to immature DC preparations for presentation of melanoma peptides and that IL-2 may increase clinical responses to the DCs plus peptides. However, in our view the low response rates do not justify the cost and complexity of this treatment approach.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.
hi@scite.ai
10624 S. Eastern Ave., Ste. A-614
Henderson, NV 89052, USA
Copyright © 2024 scite LLC. All rights reserved.
Made with 💙 for researchers
Part of the Research Solutions Family.